Skip to content

A Study Based on Japanese Medical Records That Looks at Bleeding Events in People With Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease Who Start Taking Either Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, or Warfarin

Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Warfarin, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Among Japanese Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) and Concomitant Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05051904
Enrollment
39357
Registered
2021-09-21
Start date
2022-05-17
Completion date
2022-07-29
Last updated
2024-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Coronary Artery Disease

Brief summary

The study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness comparisons between warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban in routine clinical practice among Japanese non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD).

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

-≥18 years of age * Has one year of look-back period prior to the index date (defined as the first date of prescription for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin during the study period) * New users of warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban, defined as patients without historic use of any oral anticoagulants during the look-back period * Has at least 1 diagnosis of NVAF during the look-back period prior to or on the index date * Has at least 1 diagnosis of CAD during the look-back period prior to or on the index date

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with end-stage renal disease, or undergo hemodialysis, or experience pregnancy during the study period * Initiate warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban due to valvular Atrial Fibrillation (AF), AF associated with mechanical valve malfunction or mechanical complication of heart valve prosthesis, or rheumatic AF * Underwent joint replacement procedures or diagnosed with venous thromboembolism during the look-back period prior to or on the index date * Prescribed with more than 1 oral anticoagulation (OAC) on the index date * Prescribed with more than 2 anti-platelet drugs per prescription (triple or quadruple anti-platelet use), or prescribed with any anti-platelet injection * Patients with missing or ambiguous age or sex information

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence Rate of Fatal or Non-fatal Major BleedingFrom the cohort entry date (first prescription of the drug of interest) to the earliest occurrence of the event (discontinuation of drug of interest, switching to another Oral Anticoagulation, loss of follow-up, death, end of the study). Up to 9 years.Incidence rate of fatal or non-fatal major bleeding per number of person-years, defined as any blood transfusion and/or any hospitalization with associated bleeding in all three patient groups. The incidence rate was reported as the number of events (counts the first event per patient) divided by the total number of person-years at risk during follow-up (1/(1000\*person-years)).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence Rate of Composite Outcome of Stroke/SE/MI/All-cause Mortality (Inpatient) /Major Bleeding/Major GI Bleeding/ICHFrom the cohort entry date (first prescription of the drug of interest) to the earliest occurrence of the event (discontinuation of drug of interest, switching to another Oral Anticoagulation, loss of follow-up, death, end of the study). Up to 9 years.Incidence rate of the Composite outcome of stroke/SE/MI/all-cause mortality (inpatient) /major bleeding/major GI bleeding (hospitalization due to gastrointestinal bleeding)/ICH (Intracraneal hemorrhage) per number of person-years. The incidence rate was reported as the number of events (counts the first event per patient) divided by the total number of person-years at risk during follow-up (1/(1000\*person-years)). The propensity scores were estimated using the multivariable logistic regression model. Statistical analysis for comparisons: Dabigatran-Warfarin, and Rivaroxaban-Warfarin are presented as per protocol.

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A Real world, non-interventional cohort study based on existing data from The Medical Data Vision Co. Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). The study aimed to make safety and effectiveness comparisons between warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban in routine clinical practice among Japanese non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with concomitant Coronary Artery Disease (CAD).

Pre-assignment details

Every patient who fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria and agreed to participate in the study was selected until the required sample size was achieved.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Warfarin
All eligible Japanese on-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with concomitant Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), who were prescribed with warfarin. From existing data from the Japan Medical Data Vision Co. Ltd. (MDV) database, which covered all insurance types and a large population size. The study period started on April 18th, 2011 (start of data collection) to December 31st, 2020 (end of data collection).
12,316
Dabigatran
All eligible Japanese on-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with concomitant Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), who were prescribed with dabigatran. From existing data from the Japan Medical Data Vision Co. Ltd. (MDV) database, which covered all insurance types and a large population size. The study period started on April 18th, 2011 (start of data collection) to December 31st, 2020 (end of data collection).
6,712
Rivaroxaban
All eligible Japanese on-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with concomitant Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), who were prescribed with rivaroxaban. From existing data from the Japan Medical Data Vision Co. Ltd. (MDV) database, which covered all insurance types and a large population size. The study period started on April 18th, 2011 (start of data collection) to December 31st, 2020 (end of data collection).
20,329
Total39,357

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDabigatranRivaroxabanWarfarinTotal
Age, Continuous71.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
74.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
77.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
74.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1820 Participants6411 Participants4448 Participants12679 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4892 Participants13918 Participants7868 Participants26678 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Incidence Rate of Fatal or Non-fatal Major Bleeding

Incidence rate of fatal or non-fatal major bleeding per number of person-years, defined as any blood transfusion and/or any hospitalization with associated bleeding in all three patient groups. The incidence rate was reported as the number of events (counts the first event per patient) divided by the total number of person-years at risk during follow-up (1/(1000\*person-years)).

Time frame: From the cohort entry date (first prescription of the drug of interest) to the earliest occurrence of the event (discontinuation of drug of interest, switching to another Oral Anticoagulation, loss of follow-up, death, end of the study). Up to 9 years.

Population: Matched cohort of initiators of Dabigatran, Warfarin, Rivaroxaban using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method, identified from the Japan Medical Data Vision Co. Ltd. (MDV) database on April 18th, 2011 (start of data collection) to December 31st, 2020 (end of data collection).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dabigatran - Matched With Warfarin Using the s-IPTW MethodIncidence Rate of Fatal or Non-fatal Major Bleeding26 Events per 1,000 person-years
Warfarin - Matched With Dabigatran Using the s-IPTW MethodIncidence Rate of Fatal or Non-fatal Major Bleeding52 Events per 1,000 person-years
Rivaroxaban - Matched With Warfarin Using the s-IPTW MethodIncidence Rate of Fatal or Non-fatal Major Bleeding41 Events per 1,000 person-years
Warfarin - Matched With Rivaroxaban Using the s-IPTW MethodIncidence Rate of Fatal or Non-fatal Major Bleeding52 Events per 1,000 person-years
Dabigatran - Matched With Rivaroxaban Using the s-IPTW MethodIncidence Rate of Fatal or Non-fatal Major Bleeding26 Events per 1,000 person-years
Rivaroxaban - Matched With Dabigatran Using the s-IPTW MethodIncidence Rate of Fatal or Non-fatal Major Bleeding41 Events per 1,000 person-years
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.402, 0.622]Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.000495% CI: [0.686, 0.896]Regression, Cox
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.514, 0.791]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Incidence Rate of Composite Outcome of Stroke/SE/MI/All-cause Mortality (Inpatient) /Major Bleeding/Major GI Bleeding/ICH

Incidence rate of the Composite outcome of stroke/SE/MI/all-cause mortality (inpatient) /major bleeding/major GI bleeding (hospitalization due to gastrointestinal bleeding)/ICH (Intracraneal hemorrhage) per number of person-years. The incidence rate was reported as the number of events (counts the first event per patient) divided by the total number of person-years at risk during follow-up (1/(1000\*person-years)). The propensity scores were estimated using the multivariable logistic regression model. Statistical analysis for comparisons: Dabigatran-Warfarin, and Rivaroxaban-Warfarin are presented as per protocol.

Time frame: From the cohort entry date (first prescription of the drug of interest) to the earliest occurrence of the event (discontinuation of drug of interest, switching to another Oral Anticoagulation, loss of follow-up, death, end of the study). Up to 9 years.

Population: Matched cohort of initiators of Dabigatran, Warfarin, Rivaroxaban using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method, identified from the Japan Medical Data Vision Co. Ltd. (MDV) database on April 18th, 2011 (start of data collection) to December 31st, 2020 (end of data collection).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dabigatran - Matched With Warfarin Using the s-IPTW MethodIncidence Rate of Composite Outcome of Stroke/SE/MI/All-cause Mortality (Inpatient) /Major Bleeding/Major GI Bleeding/ICH213 Events per 1,000 person-years
Warfarin - Matched With Dabigatran Using the s-IPTW MethodIncidence Rate of Composite Outcome of Stroke/SE/MI/All-cause Mortality (Inpatient) /Major Bleeding/Major GI Bleeding/ICH275 Events per 1,000 person-years
Rivaroxaban - Matched With Warfarin Using the s-IPTW MethodIncidence Rate of Composite Outcome of Stroke/SE/MI/All-cause Mortality (Inpatient) /Major Bleeding/Major GI Bleeding/ICH228 Events per 1,000 person-years
Warfarin - Matched With Rivaroxaban Using the s-IPTW MethodIncidence Rate of Composite Outcome of Stroke/SE/MI/All-cause Mortality (Inpatient) /Major Bleeding/Major GI Bleeding/ICH275 Events per 1,000 person-years
Dabigatran - Matched With Rivaroxaban Using the s-IPTW MethodIncidence Rate of Composite Outcome of Stroke/SE/MI/All-cause Mortality (Inpatient) /Major Bleeding/Major GI Bleeding/ICH213 Events per 1,000 person-years
Rivaroxaban - Matched With Dabigatran Using the s-IPTW MethodIncidence Rate of Composite Outcome of Stroke/SE/MI/All-cause Mortality (Inpatient) /Major Bleeding/Major GI Bleeding/ICH228 Events per 1,000 person-years
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.714, 0.851]Regression, Cox
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.777, 0.88]Regression, Cox

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026