Skip to content

Comparative Effectiveness of Muscle Energy Technique and Trigger Point Release in Plantar Fasciitis

Effectiveness of Muscle Energy Technique and Trigger Point Release in Plantar Fasciitis: a Comparative Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05050331
Enrollment
30
Registered
2021-09-20
Start date
2023-01-23
Completion date
2023-05-24
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Plantar Fasciitis

Keywords

Muscle Energy Technique, Trigger Point Release

Brief summary

This study aimed to investigate the comparative efficacy of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) and Trigger Point Release in the treatment of Plantar Fasciitis. A single-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted, wherein thirty participants were randomly assigned to two parallel groups. One group received MET, while the other received Trigger Point Release, with both groups performed self-stretching exercises as part of their home program. Outcome measures included pain intensity and foot function. Treatments were administered three times a week for a duration of four weeks.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMuscle Energy Technique

MET involves patient-generated muscle contractions 10-20% maximum voluntary contraction from a specific position and direction, resisted by the therapist to facilitate muscle relaxation and lengthening

Trigger point release involved applying 90 seconds of sustained thumb pressure to the trigger point, repeated three times with 30-second relaxation intervals, followed by three caudal-to-cranial longitudinal strokes along the taut band.

PROCEDURESelf-Stretching of Calf and Plantar Fascia

Participants performed a self-stretching program, comprising 5 repetitions of 20 seconds of stretching and 20 seconds of relaxation, twice daily

Sponsors

University of Faisalabad
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Unilateral plantar heel pain that worsens with weight-bearing activities * Age range: 25-45 years * Pain exacerbation with initial morning ambulation (i.e., walking a few steps) * Presence of at least one identifiable trigger point in the calf muscles

Exclusion criteria

* Bilateral heel pain * History of tumors in the leg or foot * Previous lower limb fractures * Recent or unresolved lower limb injuries * Achilles Tendinitis * Ankle arthritis * Surgery * Vascular Disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Foot PainFour WeeksNumeric Pain Rating Scale served as the primary outcome measure, with decreasing values indicating improved patient condition and reduced pain intensity

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Foot FunctionFour WeeksFoot function index was utilized as a secondary outcome measure, with decreasing scores indicating improved foot function and reduced functional impairment as patient condition improves

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026