Skip to content

Adjunctive Transcranial Stimulation to Reduce Impulsivity in Opiate Use Disorder

Adjunctive Transcranial Stimulation to Reduce Impulsivity in Opiate Use Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05049460
Enrollment
23
Registered
2021-09-20
Start date
2021-09-15
Completion date
2024-07-31
Last updated
2025-10-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Opioid-use Disorder, Tobacco Use Disorder

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to examine the effect of four sessions of theta burst stimulation (TBS) versus sham TMS on attentional bias for smoking and opioid cues versus neutral stimuli in a population of patients with tobacco use disorder (TUD) with comorbid opioid use disorder (OUD) that is stable and on treatment with buprenorphine. The investigators will also examine the effect of TBS on craving for cigarettes as well as opioids. Participants will perform a stress induction procedure that mirrors an optimum combination of cues that trigger tonic craving in their environment while exposed to stress. All four sessions of TBS/sham TMS will be performed on the same day, with each session lasting for approximately 10 minutes and separated by 50 minute intervals.

Detailed description

Tobacco use disorder (TUD) is highly comorbid with opioid use disorder (OUD). Craving in TUD as well as OUD is of two kinds - phasic and tonic. Phasic craving is present at baseline and tonic craving is accentuated by environmental stimuli. A predominant mediator of tonic craving is attentional bias (AB) for environmental stimuli related to either smoking or opioid use. The study is comprised of two days of participation. On the first day, participants will perform two attentional bias (AB) paradigms - one to assess their baseline AB for smoking cues versus neutral cues and another AB paradigm to assess baseline AB for opioid cues versus neutral cues. Craving will be assessed using tobacco craving questionnaire and a visual analogue scale (for opioids), in the context of participants performing a stress induction procedure (which will be a combination of the cold pressor test and PASAT). The investigators will also acquire a baseline resting state fMRI in addition to MRPAGE structural T1 and T2W sequences. On the second day, participants will receive either four sessions of TBS or sham TMS. Targeting will be down using processed resting state brain scan. Each session of TBS or sham TMS will last approximately 10 minutes. During each of the 50 minute intervals between stimulation sessions, participants will perform AB paradigms for smoking and opioids. The craving scale with stress induction will be performed twice - once before the sessions and once after the four sessions of TBS/sham TMS. The investigators will also acquire resting state scans after the four sessions of TBS/sham TMS.

Interventions

DEVICETheta Burst Stimulation

Four sessions of theta burst stimulation (TBS) at 120 % RMT and comprising 7200 pulses, given with functional targeting.

DEVICESham TMS

Four sessions of sham TMS, done using the A/P MagVenture coil, with subject's head separated from the coil by foam padding.

Sponsors

Gopalkumar Rakesh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients enrolled in the SMART Clinic at University of Kentucky * 18-60 years of age * Preferably right hand dominant * Currently self-report smoking 10 of more cigarettes per day or a score of \> 5 on the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine * Willing and able to abstain from all drug use * Exhaled breath on day of study CO \< 10 ppm * Stabilized on maintenance buprenorphine if having comorbid opioid use disorder * Able to read and speak English * Able to provide informed consent to participate.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant, nursing, or becoming pregnant during the study. * History of traumatic brain injury or seizures which are contraindications for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). * Increased risk of seizure for any reason, including prior diagnosis of epilepsy, seizure disorder, increased intracranial pressure, or history of significant head trauma with loss of consciousness for ≥ 5 minutes which are all contraindications for TMS. * Presence of intracranial implants (e.g. aneurysms clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes), cardiac pacemakers, or vagus nerve stimulation device which are all contraindications for magnetic resonance imaging. * Neurological disorder including, but not limited to: space occupying brain lesion; any history of seizures, history of cerebrovascular accident; fainting, cerebral aneurysm, major neurocognitive disorder, Huntington chorea; multiple sclerosis which are all contraindications for TMS.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Attentional Bias for Smoking StimuliBaselineAttentional bias was measured at baseline using a visual probe task administered (adapted for smoking images) on a computer and an eye tracker. Images of cigarettes and matched neutral images were presented on a laptop screen, 3 cm apart. Upon offsetting the image pairs, a visual probe (X) appeared on either the left or right side of the screen, in the exact location of one of the previously presented images. Attentional bias is quantified by subtracting the average fixation time on neutral cues from the average fixation time on cigarette cues. The fixation time is measured with an eye tracker in milliseconds.
Attentional Bias for Opioid StimuliBaselineAttentional bias was measured using a visual probe task administered (adapted for opioid images) on a computer and an eye tracker. Images of opioids and matched neutral images were presented on a laptop screen, 3 cm apart. Upon offsetting the image pairs, a visual probe (X) appeared on either the left or right side of the screen, in the exact location of one of the previously presented images. Attentional bias is quantified by subtracting the average fixation time on neutral cues from the average fixation time on opioid cues. The fixation time is measured with an eye tracker in milliseconds.
CravingBaselineThe Tobacco Craving Questionnaire-short form (TCQ-SF) consists of 12 items rated on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 84 with a higher score equating to increased craving.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Showing Functional Connectivity ChangesBaseline and immediately after intervention (sessions of TBS or sham TMS)Changes in resting state network changes caused by TBS/sham TMS

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active Intervention
Four sessions of theta burst stimulation, amounting to 7200 pulses at 120% resting motor threshold. Targeting will be done using neuronavigation and processed resting state brain scan. Theta Burst Stimulation: Four sessions of theta burst stimulation (TBS) at 120 % RMT and comprising 7200 pulses, given with functional targeting.
8
Sham TMS
Four sessions of sham TMS. Targeting will be done using neuronavigation and processed resting state brain scan. Sham TMS: Four sessions of sham TMS, done using the A/P MagVenture coil, with subject's head separated from the coil by foam padding.
7
Total15

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up22
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive InterventionSham TMSTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants7 Participants15 Participants
Age, Continuous38.13 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.97
35.43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.16
36.87 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.58
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants7 Participants15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 participants7 participants15 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants3 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 80 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Attentional Bias for Opioid Stimuli

Attentional bias was measured using a visual probe task administered (adapted for opioid images) on a computer and an eye tracker. Images of opioids and matched neutral images were presented on a laptop screen, 3 cm apart. Upon offsetting the image pairs, a visual probe (X) appeared on either the left or right side of the screen, in the exact location of one of the previously presented images. Attentional bias is quantified by subtracting the average fixation time on neutral cues from the average fixation time on opioid cues. The fixation time is measured with an eye tracker in milliseconds.

Time frame: Immediately after intervention (sessions of TBS or sham TMS)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active InterventionAttentional Bias for Opioid Stimuli305.80 millisecondsStandard Error 196.95
Sham TMSAttentional Bias for Opioid Stimuli158.61 millisecondsStandard Error 198.75
Primary

Attentional Bias for Opioid Stimuli

Attentional bias was measured using a visual probe task administered (adapted for opioid images) on a computer and an eye tracker. Images of opioids and matched neutral images were presented on a laptop screen, 3 cm apart. Upon offsetting the image pairs, a visual probe (X) appeared on either the left or right side of the screen, in the exact location of one of the previously presented images. Attentional bias is quantified by subtracting the average fixation time on neutral cues from the average fixation time on opioid cues. The fixation time is measured with an eye tracker in milliseconds.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active InterventionAttentional Bias for Opioid Stimuli373.09 millisecondsStandard Error 176.06
Sham TMSAttentional Bias for Opioid Stimuli132.01 millisecondsStandard Error 70.89
Primary

Attentional Bias for Smoking Stimuli

Attentional bias was measured at baseline using a visual probe task administered (adapted for smoking images) on a computer and an eye tracker. Images of cigarettes and matched neutral images were presented on a laptop screen, 3 cm apart. Upon offsetting the image pairs, a visual probe (X) appeared on either the left or right side of the screen, in the exact location of one of the previously presented images. Attentional bias is quantified by subtracting the average fixation time on neutral cues from the average fixation time on cigarette cues. The fixation time is measured with an eye tracker in milliseconds.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active InterventionAttentional Bias for Smoking Stimuli501.53 millisecondsStandard Error 145.24
Sham TMSAttentional Bias for Smoking Stimuli406.70 millisecondsStandard Error 116.41
Primary

Attentional Bias for Smoking Stimuli

Attentional bias was measured using a visual probe task administered (adapted for smoking images) on a computer and an eye tracker. Images of cigarettes and matched neutral images were presented on a laptop screen, 3 cm apart. Upon offsetting the image pairs, a visual probe (X) appeared on either the left or right side of the screen, in the exact location of one of the previously presented images. Attentional bias is quantified by subtracting the average fixation time on neutral cues from the average fixation time on cigarette cues. The fixation time is measured with an eye tracker in milliseconds.

Time frame: Immediately after intervention (sessions of TBS or sham TMS)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active InterventionAttentional Bias for Smoking Stimuli275.83 millisecondsStandard Error 158.14
Sham TMSAttentional Bias for Smoking Stimuli414.52 millisecondsStandard Error 254.3
Primary

Craving

The Tobacco Craving Questionnaire-short form (TCQ-SF) consists of 12 items rated on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 84 with a higher score equating to increased craving.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active InterventionCraving57.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.3
Sham TMSCraving53.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.1
Primary

Craving

The Tobacco Craving Questionnaire-short form (TCQ-SF) consists of 12 items rated on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 84 with a higher score equating to increased craving.

Time frame: Immediately after intervention (sessions of TBS or sham TMS)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active InterventionCraving54.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.3
Sham TMSCraving48.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.9
Secondary

Number of Participants Showing Functional Connectivity Changes

Changes in resting state network changes caused by TBS/sham TMS

Time frame: Baseline and immediately after intervention (sessions of TBS or sham TMS)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Active InterventionNumber of Participants Showing Functional Connectivity Changes7 Participants
Sham TMSNumber of Participants Showing Functional Connectivity Changes7 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026