Skip to content

Pilot Study of an Advance Care Planning Intervention Among Persons With Dementia

Pilot Study of an Advance Care Planning Intervention Among Persons With Dementia in Long-term Services and Support Facilities

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05049291
Enrollment
13
Registered
2021-09-20
Start date
2022-11-10
Completion date
2023-07-18
Last updated
2023-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced Care Planning, Dementia

Brief summary

Advance care planning allows people to have their wishes taken into account even in the advanced stages of the persons' condition and at the end of life when the person may be unable to communicate. However, a recent review found an absence of high-quality guidelines for advanced care planning in dementia care. Since few evidence-based resources exist, the investigators propose a study to generate, refine, and pilot test an education information sheet designed to promote advanced care planning among families of persons with dementia.

Detailed description

To determine the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of an education information sheet to promote advance care planning among family members of persons with advanced dementia in long-term services and support facilities. Introducing an education information sheet containing prognosis and outcomes will be feasible, acceptable, and increase self-efficacy and do-not-hospitalize decision preferences among family members of persons with advanced dementia.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALtelehealth advance care planning

An education information sheet containing prognosis and outcomes of acute care and intensive treatments

Sponsors

University of Pennsylvania
CollaboratorOTHER
Oregon Health and Science University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Family member of a person with a diagnosis of dementia (any type) * English-speaking family member * Family member of a person with dementia admitted to a nursing home

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to understand/read English * Advance directive already in patient chart

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of Information Sheet among Study Population6 monthsFeasibility of the information sheet is defined as the consent rate of family members who are offered enrollment. This will be calculatd as a percent of family members (number of enrolled participants/number of eligible participants offered enrollment)
Acceptibility of Decision Aid Tool6 monthsAcceptability using an adapted tool (https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/eval\_accept.html) which measures the ratings of comprehensibility of the information sheet among participants in the intervention group. Responses are reported descriptively in terms of proportions responding positively or negatively on each criteria.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adaptation of Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey6 monthsQuestions adapted from an 82-item questionnaire that measures advance care planning engagement in terms of knowledge, contemplation, self-efficacy and readiness. We include 10 questions from the measure. We used a mean imputation approach. All available data were included to create an average 5-point Likert score.
Preparation for Decision-Making Scale6 monthsMeasures perception of the usefulness of a decision support tool in preparing respondent for decision-making. Responses are on a Likert scale of 1-5 with one being not at all and five being a great deal. Items are summed for scoring. A higher score indicates a higher level of perceived helpfulness in preparing for decision-making.
Decision Self-efficacy Scale6 monthsMeasures self-confidence or belief in one's abilities in decision making, including shared decision making. Eleven responses are measured on a 0-4 likert scale and a final summed scale is converted to a 0-100 range (scores are summed, divided by 11, then multiplied by 25). A score of zero means low self efficacy and score of 100 means extremely high self efficacy.
Knowledge about Dementia6 monthsSix questions to assess family members' knowledge about dementia were developed for this pilot study. All questions are true/false. Each correct answer will be coded as 1, each incorrect answer will be scored as 0. Higher scores indicate more knowledge.
Adaptation of Advance Care Planning Engagement for Surrogates Survey6 monthsWe adapted 9 items from the 17-item Advance Care Planning for Surrogates survey. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale. We will calculate a summary score, with higher scores indicates a higher level of engagement.
Family Member Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale6 monthsMeasures family member self-efficacy in medical decision-making on behalf of a loved one. This scale has two versions, one for conscious and one for unconscious loved ones, which we will use accordingly. Thirteen items are measured on a 0-5 Likert scale with 1 being cannot do at all and 5 being certain I can do. Higher scores indicate higher decision making self-efficacy.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026