Skip to content

Nurse-led Smoking Cessation Program With Follow-up in Healthy Life Centres: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Clinical and Health-economic Effects of a Nurse-led Smoking Cessation Program With Follow-up in Healthy Life Centres With Free Cessation Drugs: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05049174
Enrollment
221
Registered
2021-09-20
Start date
2021-11-01
Completion date
2026-08-01
Last updated
2026-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Diseases, Nurse's Role, Smoking Behaviors, Smoking Cessation

Brief summary

A better understanding of how to incorporate effective smoking cessation measures into clinical practice is requested. In this is prospective, multi-center, randomized, open, blinded end-point (PROBE) trial, we assigned daily smokers hospitalized with an acute cardiac event 1:1 to an in-hospital nurse-led smoking cessation intervention with direct referral to further follow-up in the municipal healthy life-centres (intensive intervention) or to written information about smoking cessation and the municipal program (low-threshold intervention) . The primary outcome will be the smoking cessation rates between the groups at 6 months follow-up. Key secondary outcomes include a cost-effectiveness analysis of the intensive intervention and cessation rates at 3- and 12-months follow-up, the proportion who used nicotine replacement therapy and the proportion who attended the healthy-life center program between the two groups. We also assess effects of recurrent cardiovascular events and mortality after 12 months, two and five years follow-up. Exploratory analyses include new knowledge about the patient and system factors of importance for participation to healthy life-centers and for changes in smoking behaviour.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALNuse-led interview and referral to municipal healthy life-centres

Usual care treatment and written information to patients and general practitionnaires about smoking cessation and the municipal healthy life-centres

Sponsors

Vestre Viken Hospital Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER
University of Oslo
CollaboratorOTHER
Oslo University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Norwegian Directorate of Health
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Norwegian Institute of Public Health
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Participants were randomized 1:1 to an in-hospital nurse-led smoking cessation intervention with systematic referrral to the municipal healthy life-centres or to written information about smoking cessation and the municipal health service program.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age\> 18 years and smokes at least 1 cigarette daily * Hospitalized with an acute cardiovascular event (i.e. myocardial infarction, unstable or stable angina, arrythmias, stroke, transitory ischemic attac, carotid stenosis or claudication with need for revascularization) * established atheroscledrotic cardiovascular disease * Sign informed consent and is expected to participate according to ICH /GCP

Exclusion criteria

* Does not usually live or work in the Vestre Viken catchment area * Any condition (e.g. psychosis, alcohol abuse, dementia) or situation that may pose a significant risk to the participant, confuse the results or make participation unethical * Lack of Norwegian and English knowledge * Short life expectancy (\<12 months)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference between the groups in point prevalence of self-report smoking abstinence at six months follow-upSix months after randomizationDifference between the groups in the proportion of participants who self-report smoking abstinence over the whole follow-up period at six months follow-up allowing up to five cigarettes in total

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference between the groups in proportion who quit smoking determined with objectivelySix months after randomizationDifference between the groups in proportion of participants who quit smoking measured by the level of carbon monoxide in the exhaled air
Difference between the groups in point prevalence of self-report smoking abstinence three months after randomizationThree months after randomizationDifference between the groups in the proportion of participants who self-report smoking abstinence over the whole periode follow-up period at six months follow-up allowing up to five cigarettes in total
Difference between the groups in point prevalence of self-report smoking abstinence 12 months after randomizationTwelve months after randomizationDifference between the groups in the proportion of participants who self-report smoking abstinence over the whole periode follow-up period at six months follow-up allowing up to five cigarettes in total
Differences in participation rate at healthy life-centres between the groups8 to 12 weeks after randomizationDifferences in participation rate at healthy life-centres between the groups measured by telephone interview with personnell at the healthy life-centres
Differences in use of smoking cessation aids between the groups8 to 12 weeks after randomizationDifferences in the proportion of patients who use of smoking cessation aids (nicotine replacement therapy) between the groups measured by patient self-report
Difference between the groups in the composite end-point all-cause mortality, hospitalisation for myocardial infarction, stroke, transitrory ischemic attac, coronary revascularisation or symptomatic periperial artery diseaseFrom baseline until 1.5 years follow-upDifference between the groups in the composite end-point all-cause mortality, hospitalisation for myocardial infarction, stroke, transitrory ischemic attac, coronary revascularisation or symptomatic periperial artery disease obtained from hospital medical records
Difference between the groups in the composite end-point all-cause mortality, hospitalisation for myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularisation, revascularization therapy for periperial artery disease or amputationFrom baseline until 3.5 years follow-upDifference between the groups in the composite end-point all-cause mortality, hospitalisation for myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularisation, revascularization therapy for periperial artery disease or amputation obtained from hospital medical records

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 5, 2026