Skip to content

Comparison of Prone Position and Standard Electrocardiogram in COVID-19 Patients

Comparison of Prone Position and Standard Electrocardiogram in COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Study in Specialized COVID-19

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05047835
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-09-17
Start date
2021-09-10
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2023-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Cardiovascular Diseases, COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Keywords

COVID-19, electrocardiogram, ARDS, Prone position

Brief summary

Prolonged prone position ventilation reduces the 30-day mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and in COVID-19 infection. A large number of patients with COVID-19 suffered from new-onset cardiac disease, therefore, ECG is crucial. However, there is limited data on the effects of prone position on the ECG in COVID-19 patients.

Detailed description

Prolonged prone position ventilation reduces the 30-day mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and in COVID-19 infection. The evidence showed that a large number of patients with COVID-19 suffered from new-onset cardiac disease due to inflammatory processes or cytokine storm, therefore, ECG is crucial for making the diagnosis including arrhythmias and myocardial infarction. However, there is limited data on the effects of prone position on the ECG in COVID-19 patients. Therefore, we aimed to identify differences of electrical parameters between prone position and standard ECG including the difference in amplitude and duration of P, QRS, PR interval, QT interval, ST-segment between both positions (supine and prone). Furthermore, we aimed to compare clinical diagnosis from EKG between prone position and standard ECG by the cardiologists.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTelectrocardiogram

Prone position electrocardiogram

Sponsors

Khon Kaen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* COVID-19 patients who were admitted to the COVID-19 specialized ward * Age 18 -80 years old * Suffered from pulmonary infiltration

Exclusion criteria

* Intubated patients * Cardiac arrest patients whether at presentation or during the study period * ECG cannot be performed due to anatomical defects or superficial skin problems

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The change of P wave amplitudeThe first day of admissionThe relative changes in P-wave amplitudes with different body positions were evaluated by dividing the 12-lead ECG into subregions (I, aVL: lateral limb leads; II, III, and aVF: inferior leads; V1 to V3: anterior precordial leads; V4 to V6: lateral precordial leads).
The change of QRS-complex amplitudeThe first day of admissionThe relative changes in QRS-complex amplitudes with different body positions were evaluated by dividing the 12-lead ECG into subregions (I, aVL: lateral limb leads; II, III, and aVF: inferior leads; V1 to V3: anterior precordial leads; V4 to V6: lateral precordial leads).
The change of T wave amplitudeThe first day of admissionThe relative changes in T wave amplitudes with different body positions were evaluated by dividing the 12-lead ECG into subregions (I, aVL: lateral limb leads; II, III, and aVF: inferior leads; V1 to V3: anterior precordial leads; V4 to V6: lateral precordial leads).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
DiagnosisThe first day of admission.The EKG diagnosis from prone position and standard supine position which perform in the same time, in the same patient, by a cardiologist will be compared.

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Primary ContactPraew Kotruchin, MD, PhD.
kpraew@kku.ac.th+66366869

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026