Skip to content

Online Yoga and the Impact on Psychosis

Exploring the Impact of Online Yoga on Outcome and Recovery in People With Psychosis.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05046912
Enrollment
36
Registered
2021-09-16
Start date
2021-11-11
Completion date
2022-11-05
Last updated
2022-06-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psychosis

Keywords

Psychosis, Yoga, Mindfulness, Recovery, Online

Brief summary

Yoga and mindfulness are considered complementary and alternative healthcare options that involve breathing techniques, relaxation, and bodily postures (yoga only). Research has shown a positive effect of these on depression, quality of life, and other symptoms of psychosis. As an 8-week pilot study, the goal is to offer yoga and/or mindfulness online and to explore the effect on recovery and quality of life for people with psychosis.

Detailed description

Psychosis impacts about 3% of Canadians at any given time. People with psychosis can experience a combination of positive (e.g., delusions; hallucinations), negative (e.g., amotivation; reduced social activity), or cognitive symptoms (e.g., poorer memory; executive functioning). Positive symptoms are managed via antipsychotic medication and therapeutic support; cognitive symptoms can be targeted via cognitive remediation therapy. For negative symptoms, especially those idiopathic, there are still no effective care options. Yoga is a complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) encompassing health modalities of Eastern cultures, it involves breathing techniques, relaxation, and bodily postures. Research has shown that yoga can improve levels of depression and quality of life, and even attenuate negative symptoms. Given the extensive health care expenditures and unmet care needs for negative symptoms, there is a growing need to consider CAMs, such as yoga, and accessibility of CAMs via online methods. As a pioneering study, this proposed pilot study aims to explore the effect of an 8-week (i.e., 8 sessions) online yoga program on recovery/outcome, with a focus on negative symptoms, for people with psychosis. The investigators aim to recruit 24 people with psychosis and randomly assign them to either the yoga (n=12) or a mindfulness group (n=12); mindfulness, in essence, is yoga without the physical aspect (i.e., poses). The investigators hypothesize that yoga will improve quality of life and attenuate symptom severity, with a larger effect on negative symptoms, above the effect of mindfulness. A nonclinical sample (n=12) will also be recruited to examine feasibility and for feedback purposes.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALYoga

8 weeks of online weekly yoga or chair yoga class

BEHAVIORALMindfulness

8 weeks of online weekly mindfulness class

Sponsors

The Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Clinical and non-clinical participants will be assigned to either a yoga or mindfulness condition.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

For clinical participants: * primary diagnosis of a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder (schizophrenia, schizophreniform, schizoaffective) or related psychotic disorder (delusional, brief psychotic, paraphrenia, bipolar with psychotic features, major-depressive with psychotic features) * access to protected internet (i.e., home internet plugged or password protected wireless) * adequate space to do yoga (e.g., at least 2 feet around each side of the yoga mat) * able to speak and read English * competent and able to offer voluntary informed consent to participate For non-clinical participants (healthy controls): * not diagnosed with or received care for any mental illness * access to protected internet (i.e., home internet plugged or password protected wireless) * adequate space to do yoga (e.g., at least 2 feet around each side of the yoga mat) * able to speak and read English * competent and able to offer voluntary informed consent to participate

Exclusion criteria

For clinical participants: * not clinically stable; that is, major change in primary medication (e.g., switching or stopping antipsychotic) or hospitalisation within the past 4 weeks prior to first contact * currently with a physical ailment that restricts light movement exercises for yoga or chair yoga For non-clinical participants (healthy controls): * have a first-degree relative with psychosis (schizophrenia, schizo-affective, schizophreniform, paraphrenia, brief psychotic, delusional, or bipolar or major depressive disorder with psychotic features) * had a substance or alcohol abuse/dependence in the past 6 months * currently with a physical ailment that restricts light movement exercises for yoga or chair yoga

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline on the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-10) scale at week 4Baseline and Week 4The CORE-10 is a self-reported instrument measuring levels of psychological distress in the past week. Possible scores range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (most or all of the time). Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (week 4 - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-10) scale at week 8Baseline and Week 8The CORE-10 is a self-reported instrument measuring levels of psychological distress in the past week. Possible scores range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (most or all of the time). Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (week 8 - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-10) scale at week 12Baseline and Week 12The CORE-10 is a self-reported instrument measuring levels of psychological distress in the past week. Possible scores range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (most or all of the time). Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (week 12 - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-10) scale at 6 monthsBaseline and 6 MonthsThe CORE-10 is a self-reported instrument measuring levels of psychological distress in the past week. Possible scores range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (most or all of the time). Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (6 month - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) scale at 4 weeksBaseline and Week 4The PANSS is a clinician-rated, semi-structured interview assessing schizophrenia symptom severity over the past week. Possible scores range from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme). Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (week 4 - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) scale at 8 weeksBaseline and Week 8The PANSS is a clinician-rated, semi-structured interview assessing schizophrenia symptom severity over the past week. Possible scores range from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme). Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (week 8 - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) scale at 12 weeksBaseline and Week 12The PANSS is a clinician-rated, semi-structured interview assessing schizophrenia symptom severity over the past week. Possible scores range from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme). Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (week 12 - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) scale at 6 monthsBaseline and 6 MonthsThe PANSS is a clinician-rated, semi-structured interview assessing schizophrenia symptom severity over the past week. Possible scores range from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme). Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (6 month - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery - Version 2 (QPR-2) scale at week 4Baseline and Week 4The QPR-2 is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of recovery over the past week. Scores range from 0 (disagree strongly) to 4 (agree strongly). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 4 - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery - Version 2 (QPR-2) scale at week 8Baseline and Week 8The QPR-2 is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of recovery over the past week. Scores range from 0 (disagree strongly) to 4 (agree strongly). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 8 - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery - Version 2 (QPR-2) scale at week 12Baseline and Week 12The QPR-2 is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of recovery over the past week. Scores range from 0 (disagree strongly) to 4 (agree strongly). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 12 - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery - Version 2 (QPR-2) scale at 6 monthsBaseline and 6 MonthsThe QPR-2 is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of recovery over the past week. Scores range from 0 (disagree strongly) to 4 (agree strongly). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (6 months - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS) scale at week 4Baseline and Week 4The SNS is a self-reported instrument assessing negative symptom severity over the past week. Possible answers are strongly agree, somewhat agree, strongly disagree. Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (week 4 - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS) scale at week 8Baseline and Week 8The SNS is a self-reported instrument assessing negative symptom severity over the past week. Possible answers are strongly agree, somewhat agree, strongly disagree. Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (week 8 - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS) scale at week 12Baseline and Week 12The SNS is a self-reported instrument assessing negative symptom severity over the past week. Possible answers are strongly agree, somewhat agree, strongly disagree. Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (week 12 - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS) scale at 6 monthsBaseline and 6 MonthsThe SNS is a self-reported instrument assessing negative symptom severity over the past week. Possible answers are strongly agree, somewhat agree, strongly disagree. Higher score = worse outcome. Change = (6 months - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Birchwood Insight Scale (BIS) scale at week 4Baseline and Week 4The BIS is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of insight without a specific time period. Possible answers are agree, disagree, unsure. Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 4 - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Birchwood Insight Scale (BIS) scale at week 8Baseline and Week 8The BIS is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of insight without a specific time period. Possible answers are agree, disagree, unsure. Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 8 - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Birchwood Insight Scale (BIS) scale at week 12Baseline and Week 12The BIS is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of insight without a specific time period. Possible answers are agree, disagree, unsure. Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 12 - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Birchwood Insight Scale (BIS) scale at 6 monthsBaseline and 6 MonthsThe BIS is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of insight without a specific time period. Possible answers are agree, disagree, unsure. Higher score = better outcome. Change = (6 months - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (SWEMWBS) scale at week 4Baseline and Week 4The SWEMWBS is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of overall mental well-being over the past 2 weeks. Possible scores range from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 4 - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (SWEMWBS) scale at week 8Baseline and Week 8The SWEMWBS is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of overall mental well-being over the past 2 weeks. Possible scores range from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 8 - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (SWEMWBS) scale at week 12Baseline and Week 12The SWEMWBS is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of overall mental well-being over the past 2 weeks. Possible scores range from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 12 - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (SWEMWBS) scale at 6 monthsBaseline and 6 MonthsThe SWEMWBS is a self-reported instrument assessing levels of overall mental well-being over the past 2 weeks. Possible scores range from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (6 months - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Modified Global Assessment of Functioning - Revised (M-GAF(R)) scale at week 4Baseline and Week 4The M-GAF(R) is a clinician-rated instrument assessing overall level of functioning over the past month. Score ranges from 1 (severely impaired) to 100 (superior functioning). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 4 - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Modified Global Assessment of Functioning - Revised (M-GAF(R)) scale at week 8Baseline and Week 8The M-GAF(R) is a clinician-rated instrument assessing overall level of functioning over the past month. Score ranges from 1 (severely impaired) to 100 (superior functioning). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 8 - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Modified Global Assessment of Functioning - Revised (M-GAF(R)) scale at week 12Baseline and Week 12The M-GAF(R) is a clinician-rated instrument assessing overall level of functioning over the past month. Score ranges from 1 (severely impaired) to 100 (superior functioning). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (week 12 - baseline).
Change from baseline on the Modified Global Assessment of Functioning - Revised (M-GAF(R)) scale at 6 monthsBaseline and 6 MonthsThe M-GAF(R) is a clinician-rated instrument assessing overall level of functioning over the past month. Score ranges from 1 (severely impaired) to 100 (superior functioning). Higher score = better outcome. Change = (6 months - baseline).

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactMichael Bodnar, PhD
michael.bodnar@theroyal.ca(613) 722-6521

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026