Skip to content

VieScope in Patients With an Expected Difficult Airway

Tracheal Intubation With VieScope Versus Videolaryngoscopy in Patients for Elective Surgery With an Expected Difficult Airway - a Prospective Randomized Trial (VieScOP-II)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05044416
Enrollment
58
Registered
2021-09-14
Start date
2021-09-11
Completion date
2022-06-26
Last updated
2022-07-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Airway Management

Brief summary

Patients requiring endotracheal intubation for elective surgery with an expected difficult airway are randomized to be intubated either by a) VieScope or b) videolaryngoscopy.

Detailed description

Tracheal intubation is required for different surgical procedures for mechanical ventilation and to prevent aspiration of secretions. In patients with an expected difficult airway, tracheal intubation is often performed by videolaryngoscopy (VL). However, this technique has limitations and may fail due to insufficient visualization of the larynx. A new device has been introduced that consists of an illuminated straight plastic tube for laryngoscopy (VSC, Vie Scope, Adroit Surgical, Oklahoma City, OK, USA) that enables for indirect intubation over a stylet. So far, the VSC has shown promising results in manikin studies for intubation in normal and difficult airways. We aim to test the VSC in patients compared to videolaryngoscopy in a prospective randomized non-inferiority trial. Patients will be assessed for eligibility in the Anesthesiology Pre-assessment Clinic of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf prior to elective surgery. All patients receive a structured preoperative airway assessment. Patients are randomized 1:1 to either intervention or control group. Patients randomized to the intervention group will be intubated with the VSC. Patients randomized to the control group are intubated with a MacIntosh type videolaryngoscope (CMAC, Storz, Germany).

Interventions

DEVICEVieScope

intubation with VieScope laryngoscope

DEVICEVideolaryngoscopy

intubation with videolaryngoscope

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

device for intubation may not be blinded for provider or investigator

Intervention model description

randomized 1:1

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients requiring general anesthesia with transoral tracheal intubation for elective surgery * Age ≥ 18 * Preoperative airway assessment reveals an expected difficult airway (rated by the responsible anesthetist in the Pre-assessment Clinic based on the existing in-house algorithm)

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or breastfeeding woman * Confirmed indications for awake fiberoptic intubation especially due to enoral, pharyngeal tumors, abscesses or other processes * Planned endotracheal intubation without deep anesthesia or neuromuscular blocking agents (e.g. awake videolaryngoscopy) * Required transnasal tracheal intubation (e.g. for surgical reasons) * Requirement of special endotracheal tubes such as laser or RAE tubes for surgical reasons * Patients at risk for pulmonary aspiration who qualify for rapid sequence induction * Loose teeth * Denial of consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Glottis Opening (POGO) scale15 minintubating conditions according to the percentage of glottis opening scale (POGO), range 0-100%, higher values better

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
time to intubation15 mintime until tracheal airway access is established
Cormack-Lehane15 minintubating conditions according to Cormack-Lehane
overall success rate15 minpercentage of successful intubations with the allocated procedure
time to successful intubation with one attempt15 mintime until tracheal airway access is established in patients that are intubated at first attempt
intubation difficulty15 minsubjective rating on a visual analogue scale (0-100, higher values indicate more difficult intubation) of the difficulty of airway management and questionnaire
first attempt success rate15 minpercentage of successful intubations with one attempt
aspiration15 minpercentage of patients that vomit and aspirate during intubation
esophageal intubation15 minpercentage of accidental esophageal intubation attempts
hypoxia15 minpercentage of patients with a desaturation below a pulsoximetric saturation of 80%
hypotension15 minpercentage of patients with a systolic blood pressure below 70 mmHg
number of attempts15 mintotal number of attempts until airway established

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026