Biliary Tract Cancer, Liver Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer
Conditions
Brief summary
In patients with cancer, resistance training appears to be a safe and effective exercise modality to increase both lean muscle mass and strength, as well as attenuates cancer-related fatigue. It may serve as a feasible intervention in these patients to mitigate cachexia, especially if implemented before the onset of cancer cachexia or in a pre-cachectic state. This study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial that will compare a blood flow restricted resistance training intervention during the pre- (prehabilitation) and post-operative (rehabilitation) phase in patients with pancreatic, biliary tract and liver cancer, versus usual care on skeletal muscle and other health-related outcomes.
Interventions
The intervention group will receive an exercise program consisting of a combination of supervised and home-based exercise with a focus to induce metabolic stress (blood flow restriction exercise) during both a pre- and postoperative period consisting of a total of 6-10 weeks. Protein supplementation will be given to exclude insufficient intake.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of resectable pancreatic cancer * Diagnosis of resectable biliary tract cancer (includes cholangiocarcinoma and ampullary cancer) * Diagnosis of resectable liver cancer * ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale) performance status ≤ 2
Exclusion criteria
* Serious active infection * Uncontrolled severe pain * Severe neurologic or cardiac impairment according ACSM criteria * Uncontrolled severe respiratory insufficiency as determined by the treating clinician * Any other contraindications for exercise as determined by the treating physician * Poor Swedish comprehension * Pregnancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Skeletal muscle thickness | Change from baseline (T0) to: 1-4 weeks (T1), 4-7 weeks (T2), 10-13 weeks (T3). | Skeletal muscle thickness (mm) measured through ultrasound |
| Skeletal muscle cross sectional area | Change from baseline (T0) to: 1-4 weeks (T1), 4-7 weeks (T2), 10-13 weeks (T3). | Skeletal muscle cross sectional area (um2) measured through ultrasound |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Skeletal muscle metabolism | Change from baseline (T0) to: 10-13 weeks (T3). | Skeletal muscle metabolism (au) measured through biochemical methods in skeletal muscle biopsies |
| Body lean mass | Change from baseline (T0) to: 1-4 weeks (T1), 4-7 weeks (T2), 10-13 weeks (T3). | Lean mass (kg) measured through bioimpedance and CT scan |
| Body fat mass | Change from baseline (T0) to: 1-4 weeks (T1), 4-7 weeks (T2), 10-13 weeks (T3). | Fat mass (kg) measured through bioimpedance and CT scan |
| Handgrip strength | Change from baseline (T0) to: 1-4 weeks (T1), 4-7 weeks (T2), 10-13 weeks (T3). | Maximal handgrip strength (kg) measured through hand dynamometry |
| Lower limb muscle strength | Change from baseline (T0) to: 1-4 weeks (T1), 4-7 weeks (T2), 10-13 weeks (T3). | Maximal leg strength (kg) measured through isometric force measurements |
| Health-related quality of life | Change from baseline (T0) to: 1-4 weeks (T1), 4-7 weeks (T2), 10-13 weeks (T3), 5-6 months (T4). | Disease specific helath related quality of life measured with The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) Summary Score (0-100 points with a higher score indicating a better quality of life) |
| Physical performance | Change from baseline (T0) to: 1-4 weeks (T1), 4-7 weeks (T2), 10-13 weeks (T3). | Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB score points ranging from 0-12 with a higher score indicating a better physical function) measured through handgrip strength test, leg strength test, endurance test |
| Skeletal muscle morphology | Change from baseline (T0) to: 10-13 weeks (T3). | Skeletal muscle morphology (au) measured through microscopy methods in skeletal muscle biopsies |
| Nutritional status | Change from baseline (T0) to: 1-4 weeks (T1), 4-7 weeks (T2), 10-13 weeks (T3), 5-6 months (T4). | Subjective Global Assessment Form scores (score ranging between 7 (normal) and 35 (severely malnourished) |
| Participants' experience of the exercise program | 3 months | Focus group and individual interviews |
| Treatment related complications | 4-7 weeks (T2) | days to recover after surgery will be assessed retrospectively through the patients' medical records. |
| Hospitalization | 5-6 months (T4) | days of being hospitalized will be assessed retrospectively through the patients' medical records. |
| Physical activity | Change from baseline (T0) to: 1-4 weeks (T1), 4-7 weeks (T2), 10-13 weeks (T3), 5-6 months (T4). | Measured through an activity tracker (hours) |
| Inflammatory markers | Change from baseline (T0) to: 10-13 weeks (T3) | Inflammation (au) will be assessed from blood serum and plasma. |
| Prognostic markers | Change from baseline (T0) to: 10-13 weeks (T3) | Prognostic markers (au) will be assessed from blood serum and plasma. |
| Cancer-related fatigue | Change from baseline (T0) to: 1-4 weeks (T1), 4-7 weeks (T2), 10-13 weeks (T3), 5-6 months (T4). | European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Fatigue12 (EORTC-QLQ-FA12) Summary Score (0-100 points with a higher score indicating a better quality of life) |
| Skeletal muscle protein levels | Change from baseline (T0) to: 10-13 weeks (T3). | Skeletal muscle protein levels (au) measured through western blot in skeletal muscle biopsies |
Countries
Norway, Sweden