Skip to content

Effect of Intrathecal Morphine on Urinary Bladder Function and Recovery in Patients Having a Cesarean Delivery

Effect of Intrathecal Morphine on Urinary Bladder Function and Recovery in Patients Having a Cesarean Delivery - A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05042817
Enrollment
56
Registered
2021-09-13
Start date
2021-10-01
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2023-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Analgesia

Keywords

Obstretics, Regional anesthesia, Injections, Spinal, Analgesics, Opioid

Brief summary

The enhanced recovery anesthesia concept has been widely adopted, including cesarean delivery. Modern obstetrical anesthesia aims to offer an experience to a patient undergoing a cesarean delivery similar to normal vaginal delivery in order to maximize postoperative comfort and facilitate bonding between the mother and her newborn. Therefore, early removal of the bladder catheter has been recommended. However, this is challenged by the administration of intrathecal morphine recommended to provide long-lasting postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery.

Detailed description

This double-blind, randomized trial investigates the effects of intrathecal morphine on urinary dynamics in women undergoing CD under spinal anesthesia. The hypothesis is that the addition of intrathecal morphine (ITM) will delay micturition in women undergoing cesarean delivery. The primary outcome is the effect of ITM on urodynamics the difference in time to micturition. The secondary outcome is the need for bladder re-catheterization.

Interventions

DRUG100 mcg morphine

The effect of intrathecal morphine on vesical function and the need for bladder re-catheterization after a cesarean delivery

DRUG0.9% NaCl

NaCl 0.9%

DRUG50 mg prilocaine + 2.5 mcg sufentanil

50 mg prilocaine + 2.5 mcg sufentanil

20 mL of ropicavaine 0.375% on each side

Sponsors

University of Liege
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Patient assessments and bladder urodynamic data collection were performed by two blinded anesthesiologists. Randomization was performed using the sealed envelopes method. Therefore, one of the anesthesiologists of the research team, who was unblinded, opened the envelopes and prepared the injection mixtures. Another two blinded anesthesiologists administered perioperative anesthesia and monitored the patient during the perioperative period, and evaluated sensitive and motor block.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ASA physical status I and II * Term singleton pregnancies * Elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia * Between October 2021 and March 2022

Exclusion criteria

* Pre-existing or gestational hypertension * Diabetes * Cardiovascular disease * Cerebrovascular disease * Known fetal abnormalities * Extremes of weight (\<40 kg or \> 100 kg) * Contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia * Twin pregnancies * Excessive intraoperative bleeding (blood loss exceeding \> 1000 mL or requiring a blood transfusion)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
First micturition (hours)until the end of the study, an average of 6 monthsVesicle function 1
Bladder volume (mL)until the end of the study, an average of 6 monthsVesicle function 2
Debimetryuntil the end of the study, an average of 6 monthsVesicle function 3

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bladder re-catherizationuntil the end of the study, an average of 6 monthsVesicle function 4

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026