Skip to content

Effect of Non-enteric Coated Enzymes Substitution on Pain in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis

Effect of Non-enteric Coated Enzymes Substitution on Pain in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis: a Double -Blinded Placebo Controlled Randomized Trial (NE-PERT Trial)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05042284
Acronym
NE-PERT
Enrollment
107
Registered
2021-09-13
Start date
2021-09-01
Completion date
2024-07-30
Last updated
2024-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pancreatitis, Pain

Brief summary

Pain in CP entails several independent yet overlapping mechanisms including oxidative stress-mediated parenchymal inflammation, pancreatic and central neuropathy and neuroplasticity. Medical modalities for long-term pain management includes antioxidants and neuromodulators. Pancreatic enzymes are also invariably used for pain management. CP with ductal obstruction and pain is treated with either endotherapy or drainage surgery. However, it has been observed that a substantially increasing proportion of patients experience pain recurrence as the duration of follow-up after endotherapy or surgery gets longer. Neural and dietary (proteins) stimuli activate CCK receptors in D1 & D2 which gives a positive feedback signal for pancreatic secretion. Once enzyme secretion starts, due to ductal and interstitial/tissue hypertension, nociception begins that results in pain. Blockade of the duodenal CCK receptors could inhibit the positive feedback loop, thereby reducing pancreatic secretion and resulting pain. Currently available enteric coated enzyme supplements are released throughout the small bowel and therefore may not be released sufficiently in the duodenum to effectively suppress the feedback loops. High doses of proteases (\ 25k-30k) would be required to block the receptors, while most of the currently available preparations have higher lipase but not proteases. This led to the investigators' hypothesis that negative feedback of CCK by non enteric coated pancreatic enzymes could ameliorate pain in a more effective manner by NE-PERT.

Detailed description

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a fibro-inflammatory disorder of the pancreas characterized by progressive and irreversible damage. It manifests with abdominal pain and/or exocrine or endocrine insufficiency. Recurrent abdominal pain is the dominant clinical hallmark that mandates aggressive management. Pain in CP entails several independent yet overlapping mechanisms including oxidative stress-mediated parenchymal inflammation, pancreatic and central neuropathy and neuroplasticity. Medical modalities for long-term pain management includes antioxidants and neuromodulators. Pancreatic enzymes are also invariably used for pain management. CP with ductal obstruction and pain is treated with either endotherapy or drainage surgery. However, it has been observed that a substantially increasing proportion of patients experience pain recurrence as the duration of follow-up after endotherapy or surgery gets longer. It has been postulated that neural and dietary (proteins) stimuli activate CCK receptors in D1 & D2 which gives a positive feedback signal for pancreatic secretion. Once enzyme secretion from the pancreas begins, due to ductal and interstitial/tissue hypertension, nociception is initiated that results in pain. On this premise, the investigators hypothesized that blocking the duodenal CCK receptors could inhibit the positive feedback loop, thereby reducing pancreatic secretion and resulting pain. Earlier meta-analyses that evaluated the effect of pancreatic enzyme supplementation on pain reported that there were no overall benefits in pain management. All but two of those studies used enteric coated enzyme. Currently available enteric coated enzyme supplements are released throughout the small bowel and therefore may not be released sufficiently in the duodenum to effectively suppress the feedback loops. High doses of proteases (\ 25k-30k) would be required to block the receptors, while most of the currently available preparations have higher lipase but not proteases. However, on subgroup analyses in the aforementioned meta-analyses, pain reduction was observed in the two studies that used non-enteric coated preparations. These studies were done several years earlier, had a small sample size, and had a cross over design. This formed that rationale of the investigators' current study to test the hypothesis using a statistically valid design with a higher sample size that would allow subgroup analyses, adjust for alternative pain mechanisms, and achieve a better effect size.

Interventions

DRUGNon-enteric coated pancreatic enzyme preparation

The patients will be given a non-enteric coated pancreatic enzyme capsule containing 30000 U of protease thrice daily along with meals for 3 months.

Sponsors

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Chronic pancreatitis of at least 3 years * At least 3 episodes of pain in the past 3 months * Pain score of at least 3 on VAS (0-10) * Age 18-60yrs * Both genders

Exclusion criteria

* Acute pancreatitis episode at the time of enrolment. * Pancreatic cancer. * Other chronic painful conditions. * Active substance use (alcohol, smoking, smokeless tobacco, illicit drugs). * Pregnancy and lactation. * Inability to give informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in pain score 23 monthsIzbicki pain score will be used. Score ranges from 0-100, 100 indicating most severe.
Change in pain score 13 monthsVisual analogue score will be used. Score ranges from 0-10, 10 indicating most severe.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in pain score 26 monthsIzbicki pain score will be used. Score ranges from 0-100, 100 indicating most severe.
Change in pain score 16 monthsVisual analogue score will be used. Score ranges from 0-10, 10 indicating most severe.
Change in number of painful days3 monthsNumber of days when the patient experienced pain
Change in quality of life3 monthsWill be measured using the EORTC QLQ c30 with PAN28 tool. Score ranges from 0 to 100. 0 indicates worst for function scales, while 100 indicates worst for symptom scales.
Change in analgesic requirement3 monthsNumber of analgesic tablets required will be recorded
Change in the number of hospitalization3 monthsNumber of hospital admissions and days in hospital will be recorded

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Quantitative sensory testing parameters (cold tolerance) [First follow-up]3 monthsCold tolerance (0-10 VAS every 10secs for 2 mins.; 10 indicates severe)
Change in Quantitative sensory testing parameters (cold tolerance) [Second follow-up]6 monthsCold tolerance (0-10 VAS every 10secs for 2 mins.; 10 indicates severe)
Change in pain DETECT score [First follow-up]3 monthsThe painDETECT questionnaire will be used. Range is 0-38, 38 indicates most severe neuropathic pain.
Change in pain DETECT score [Second follow-up]6 monthsThe painDETECT questionnaire will be used. Range is 0-38, 38 indicates most severe neuropathic pain.
Change in Quantitative sensory testing parameters (pin prick) [Second follow-up]6 monthsPin prick sensation (0-10; 10 indicates maximum);
Change in Quantitative sensory testing parameters (pin prick) [First follow-up]3 monthsPin prick sensation (0-10; 10 indicates maximum)

Countries

India

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 18, 2026