Skip to content

Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Intraoral Cryotherapy Versus Intracanal Cryotherapy on Postoperative Pain

Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Intraoral Cryotherapy Versus Intracanal Cryotherapy on Postoperative Pain in Lower Molar Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis and Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05041738
Enrollment
68
Registered
2021-09-13
Start date
2021-10-01
Completion date
2022-10-01
Last updated
2021-09-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Pain

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to clinically compare the efficacy of intraoral cryotherapy versus intracanal cryotherapy after single visit root canal therapy in lower molars with irreversible pulpitis and symptomatic apical periodontitis

Interventions

small ice packs wrapped in sterile gauze placed in the mouth on the vestibular surface of the treated tooth

Intracanal cryotherapy technique using 2.5°C cold saline irrigation as final irrigant

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 20 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Systemically healthy patient (ASA I or II). Mandibular first molar teeth with: * Preoperative sharp pain and symptomatic apical periodontitis * Absence or slight widening in the periodontal ligament (PDL). * Vital response of pulp tissue to cold pulp tester (ethyl chloride spray) . * Positive response to percussion test

Exclusion criteria

1. Medically compromised patients. 2. Pregnant women. 3. Patients reporting bruxism or clenching. 4. Patients allergic to ciprofloxacin or metronidazole. 5. Teeth associated with acute periapical abscess and/or swelling. 6. Greater than grade I mobility or pocket depth greater than 5mm. 7. Size of periapical radiolucency is greater than 8 mm. 8. No restorability: Hopeless tooth. 9. Immature teeth. 10. Radiographic evidence of external or internal root resorption vertical root fracture, perforation, calcification.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative pain assessed using Visual Analogue scale6 hours post treatmentIntensity of pain after root canal treatment will be recorded by the patient where 0= no pain, 1-3= mild pain, 4-6= moderate pain, 7-10= severe pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative pain assessed using Visual Analogue scale48 hours post treatmentIntensity of pain after root canal treatment will be recorded by the patient where 0= no pain, 1-3= mild pain, 4-6= moderate pain, 7-10= severe pain.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of analgesics taken by the patientUp to 72 hoursNumber of analgesics taken by the patient after endodontic treatment.

Contacts

Primary ContactToka M Ezzat, B.D.S. (Cairo University)
toka.ezzat@dentistry.cu.edu.eg01005137002

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026