Skip to content

SSRIs and TDCS Enhance Post-stroke Motor Recovery

Combining SSRIs and TDCS to Enhance Motor Recovery After Stroke

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05041582
Enrollment
80
Registered
2021-09-13
Start date
2021-09-01
Completion date
2025-08-31
Last updated
2021-09-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Motor, Stroke

Keywords

stroke, motor recovery, transcranial direct current stimulation, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

Brief summary

Post-stroke motor recovery is compelling but limited. Current rehabilitation has less impacts on the plateau that spontaneous biological recovery could be expected. The advances in non-invasive neuromodulation and neurophysiological characterization of critical motor recovery period enable breaking the proportional recovery limitation. Our pilot studies demonstrated the safety and responsiveness of combing dual transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and motor training in subacute stroke patients. There is also strong evidence that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) can substantially increase the effects of tDCS and improve motor function after stroke, even in the absence of depression. This proposal aims to prove the potential of combining of tDCS and the commonly used SSRI citalopram to improve response to a daily motor training intervention in acute stroke patients (Co-STARS trial).

Detailed description

This is a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study in 80 patients with first-ever, unilateral, subcortical ischemic stroke 0.5-4 weeks after stroke onset with moderate to severe hemiparesis. Participants were randomized into four groups underwent either real dual tDCS \[ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) anodal stimulation and contralesional M1 cathodal stimulation; 2 mA for 20 mins; 10 sessions within 2 weeks\] with citalopram or placebo, or sham stimulation with citalopram or placebo. All will receive concurrent hospitalized intensive rehabilitation of 2 daily sessions of 90-minute physiotherapy. Action reach am test (ARAT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), multimodality MRI and EEG will be measured at baseline and after 2 weeks' tDCS modulation. The primary outcome is the ARAT at 3 months after intervention. The combination of tDCS and a SSRI will be expected to improve response to motor training more effectively than either intervention alone. The enhanced responsiveness will be correlated or predicted by biomarkers from multimodality MRI or EEG.

Interventions

DEVICEtDCS

dual tDCS with ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) anodal stimulation and contralesional M1 cathodal stimulation, 2 weeks after SSRI treatment

DRUGCitalopram

total 3 months, since 2-4 weeks after stroke

BEHAVIORALRehabilitation

hospitalized rehabilitation, 3 hours daily

Sponsors

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Oxford
CollaboratorOTHER
Chih-Wei Tang
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* aged 20-80; * first-onset stroke * brain image confirmed unilateral subcortical infarction * moderate to severe upper-limb impairment (SAFE score \<8). * 3 days to 4 weeks after stroke onset * stable medical condition

Exclusion criteria

* metal implants, such as electrodes or pacemaker * epilepsy history or active spikes from EEG recording * major depression or taking psychoactive drugs * alcoholism or drug abuse history * combined with other severe neurological or psychiatric diagnoses * pregnancy or breastfeeding; * other contraindications to brain MRI, such as severe claustrophobia * intolerance to electrical stimulation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Motor scores 3 months after intervention3 months after interventionMotor scores include Action research arm test (0-66, higher scores mean a better outcome) and Fugl-Meyer Assessment (0-54, higher scores mean a better outcome)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026