Skip to content

Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) vs Cold EMR With Margin Snare Tip Soft Coagulation (STSC)

Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection With Adjuvant Thermal Therapy to Resection Margins - A Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05041478
Enrollment
300
Registered
2021-09-13
Start date
2023-09-19
Completion date
2028-10-01
Last updated
2025-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colon Adenoma, Colon Cancer, Colorectal Polyp

Keywords

Colonoscopy, Polypectomy, Adenoma, Colorectal Cancer

Brief summary

Randomised controlled trial comparing cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with cold snare EMR and adjuvant margin STSC in the complete resection of 15-40mm lateral-spreading adenomas

Detailed description

Rationale: Conventional EMR is well-established for the resection of lateral-spreading adenomas and has been shown to be highly efficacious with adjuvant STSC. Cauterisation-related complications occur relatively frequently and while endoscopically treatable, still carry morbidity not seen in current cold snare polypectomy data. Cold snare polypectomy has an excellent safety profile for smaller polyps, without cauterisation-related adverse events. Limited data on cold EMR for large adenomatous laterally-spreading lesions shows minimal complications. Efficacy, however, is yet to be evaluated in prospective randomised trials. Observational data demonstrates recurrence rates exceeding conventional EMR. Since STSC causes significant reduction in recurrence in conventional EMR, the safety and efficacy of this adjuvant technique, when compared to isolated cold snare EMR, has theoretical advantages in both safety and efficacy. The safety and efficacy of these two techniques will therefore be compared in a randomised controlled trial. Hypothesis: Cold snare EMR of 15-40mm lateral-spreading adenomas with adjuvant STSC is expected to be superior regarding complete resection and adenoma recurrence rates as compared to cold snare EMR.

Interventions

PROCEDURECold Snare Endoscopic mucosal resection with adjuvant snare tip soft coagulation

Use of injected chromogelofusine solution to raise a lesion prior to polypectomy. Lesion then removed with a stiff thin-wired snare. Following this defect margins are treated with electrocautery to create a rim of ablated tissue.

Use of injected chromogelofusine solution to raise a lesion prior to polypectomy. Lesion then removed with a stiff thin-wired snare.

Sponsors

Western Sydney Local Health District
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Blinding

Intervention model description

Randomised Controlled Trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Any patient undergoing colonoscopy who is older than 18 years of age, has a written consent for trial participation and has at least one laterally spreading lesion meeting the following description: * Localisation in the colon or rectum * Benign adenomatous surface features (Kudo III / IV, Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) 2a) * Granular or non-granular topography * Paris classification 0-IIa/IIb +/- Is * If present, sessile component may be no greater than 10mm in size. * Polyp size ranging from 15 to 40mm

Exclusion criteria

* Current use of antiplatelet (excluding aspirin) or anticoagulants which have not appropriately been interrupted according to the guidelines. * Known bleeding disorder or coagulopathy. * Pregnancy * History of inflammatory bowel disease * Previously attempted or otherwise non-lifting lesions * Endoscopic features suggestive of submucosal invasion (Kudo Vi/n, JNET 2b / 3) or concurrent colorectal cancer * Lesions involving the ileocaecal valve (ICV), appendiceal oriface or anorectal junction (ARJ)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete resection rate (CRR)1 dayDetermined by endoscopic assessment (no visible residual adenoma) and histological assessment (biopsies of resection margin)
Adenoma recurrence rate (ARR)4-6 monthsARR at first surveillance colonoscopy (SC1) as determined by endoscopic assessment (no visible recurrent adenoma) and histological assessment (scar biopsies)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intra-procedural and post-procedural complication rates30 daysIntraprocedural bleeding, clinically significant post-polypectomy bleeding, deep mural injury, post polypectomy coagulation syndrome

Countries

Australia

Contacts

Primary ContactMichael Bourke, MBBS
michael@citywestgastro.com.au88905555

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026