Skip to content

Distribution of Knee Isokinetic Angle-specific Moments and Ratios

Distribution of Knee Isokinetic Angle-specific Moments and Ratios: Searching for Normative Values in Healthy Subjects

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05041400
Acronym
MOMANGLE
Enrollment
70
Registered
2021-09-13
Start date
2021-09-23
Completion date
2022-04-15
Last updated
2022-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Musculoskeletal Diseases

Keywords

knee isokinetic angle

Brief summary

The quantification of the strength-producing capacity of the knee joint muscles by isokinetic measurement is one of the most widely used tools for monitoring and deciding whether to return to sport after ACL reconstruction. However, the isokinetic evaluation performed in current practice does not exploit all the measures offered by this exploration technique, which can lead to errors in analysis and interpretation of the results and underestimate its ability to predict a return to sport under optimal conditions. Recently, more complete analysis models than those currently in use and integrating the moment-angle relationship have thus proposed the use of functional ratios sweeping the whole amplitude of the knee joint. Baumgart proposed an analysis of the variation of isokinetic force moments at each angle after ligamentoplasty. This approach seems to be the future of isokinetic performance analyses, but for the moment this has only been used in pathological populations and on small numbers of patients (less than 40). There are therefore no reference values in healthy subjects.

Detailed description

Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament is a common sports trauma injury, frequently leading to a surgical intervention. However, despite the extensive scientific literature on the subject, return to sports at a lower level is common, sometimes to the point of giving up pivoting sports. Current rehabilitation strategies and the means used tend to limit their effectiveness, as do the batteries of tests for returning to sport . One of the most widely used assessments for monitoring and decision-making on return to sport after ACL reconstruction is the quantification of the strength production capacity of the knee joint muscles by isokinetic measurement. However, the isokinetic evaluation carried out in current practice does not exploit all the measures offered by this exploration technique, which can lead to errors in the analysis and interpretation of the results . This discrepancy between the possibilities offered by this tool and its current exploitation may underestimate its capacity to predict a return to sport under optimal conditions . In clinical practice, the analysis is reduced to the consideration of two indices: the peak torques of the extensor and flexor muscles of the knee, which are compared between the two legs (right and left sides), and the ratio between the torque peak of the flexor muscles and that of the extensor muscles, this ratio being considered as a control of joint balance. More comprehensive analysis models than those currently in use and integrating the moment-angle relationship have thus proposed the use of functional ratios sweeping the knee's joint range of motion. Baumgart has proposed an analysis of the variation of isokinetic force moments at each angle after ligamentoplasty . This approach seems to be the future of isokinetic performance analyses, but has so far only been used in pathological populations and on small numbers of patients (less than 40). There are therefore no reference values in healthy subjects. The search for reference values for the torque of the muscles of the knee over the entire angular range of motion represents an important line of research to improve the objective evaluation of the neuromuscular performance of the knee and the return to sport of patients, particularly following ACL reconstruction.

Interventions

OTHEREvaluation of the strength of knee flexors and extensors

Each participant will benefit from a clinical evaluation and an evaluation of the strength of knee flexors and extensors using an isokinetic dynamometer after a 10-minute warm up.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Toulouse
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female subjects, * Practicing a regular activity with a minimal activity of two trainings and one competition per week, * Practicing this activity from at least 8 continuous weeks, * Affiliated or benefiting from public health services.

Exclusion criteria

* Person presenting any of these conditions: professional player / athlete, * patient with systemic pathology or treatment affecting the musculoskeletal system, patient with a history of traumatic pathology or any pathology requiring orthopaedic/surgical treatment of the knee and/or hip and/or spine, * patient having a contraindication to an isokinetic test (disabling pain, progressive pathological process, unconsolidated fracture, unbalanced cardiovascular pathology), protected patient (adults under guardianship or other legal protection, deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision), Pregnant and/or breastfeeding women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Distribution of knee isokinetic angle1 DAYThe primary outcome will be composed of the following elements:(1)- a curve representing the distribution of the mean (and confidence interval) of the normative values of the knee flexors/extensors ratio at each angle on the tested amplitude, (2) a curve representing the distribution of the mean (and confidence interval) of the normative values of the right/left ratio at each angle on the tested amplitude,(3) a curve representing the distribution of the mean (and confidence interval) of the normative values of peak torque (normalized by subject mass) produced by the flexors and extensors at each angle over the amplitude tested, (4)- the distribution of the mean (and confidence interval) of the right/left differential on the value of the peak torque on the flexors and extensors and its angle of occurrence.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026