Skip to content

Influence of Neostigmine vs. Sugammadex on PORC and PPCs by Ultrasonography

Comparison of the Effects of Neostigmine and Sugammadex on Postoperative Residual Curarization and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Detected by Diaphragm and Lung Ultrasonography: A Study Protocol for Prospective Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05040490
Enrollment
414
Registered
2021-09-10
Start date
2021-08-31
Completion date
2022-09-30
Last updated
2021-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Pulmonary Complications

Keywords

postoperative pulmonary complications, postoperative residual curarisation, lung ultrasound, diaphragm ultrasonography

Brief summary

This trial aims to compare the incidence of postoperative residual curarisation (PORC) and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in the SUG and NEO group by means of diaphragm ultrasonography and LUS, so as to conclude whether SUG can outperform NEO in preventing occurrence of PORC and PPCs.

Detailed description

The incidence of postoperative residual curarisation (PORC) is about 2%-64% worldwide, which may be an underling risk factor of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), causing many undesirable effects on patients. Thus, reversal drugs of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) such as neostigmine (NEO) and sugammadex (SUG) have been administrated, and SUG maybe perform better in preventing PORC. Different supplementary methods to help identify PORC or PPCs have also been reported, such as adductor of pollicis acceleromyography and lung ultrasound (LUS). Recently, diaphragm ultrasonography has been used to evaluate PORC, as a novel approach.In this prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, we will enroll 414 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III, aged over 60 years, who will be scheduled to undergo arthroplasty surgery under general anesthesia. Participants will be randomized into NEO and SUG group receiving neostigmine and sugammadex as reversal drug respectively. The primary outcomes will be the incidence of PPCs in NEO and SUG group respectively. The secondary outcome is the incidence of PORC in the two groups.We hypothesize that: 1) the incidence of PPCs is lower after reversal with SUG than with NEO, 2) using the method of diaphragm ultrasonography, the incidence PORC is lower after reversal with SUG than with NEO, 3) the incidence of PPCs can be predicted by LUS and by evaluating whether there is PORC through diaphragmatic ultrasound.

Interventions

DRUGsugammadex as reversal drugs

use sugammadex to reverse neuromuscular blockade

Sponsors

Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III 2. Aged over 60 years 3. Anesthesia induction with rocuronium as NMBAs, maintenance with volatile sevoflurane 4. Scheduled to undertake joint surgery 5. Signed the informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

1. Those with a history of hepatic or renal disease, chronic or acute alcoholism, allergy or hypersensitivity to sugammadex or neostigmine, current medication with effects on the central nervous system, a history of dysfunction of neuromuscular system 2. Those with diaphragm insufficiency or massive pleural effusion 3. Women who are pregnant or nursing 4. Those undergoing upper abdominal laparotomy, after which we cannot obtain a satisfactory ultrasound imaging or do not have space for placement of ultrasonic probe 5. Declined to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications30 days after surgeryincidence of postoperative pulmonary complications

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of diaphragmatic and pulmonary function by means of diaphragm and lung ultrasonographypreoperatively, 10min and 30min after extubation for diaphragm ultrasonography and LUSEvaluation of diaphragmatic and pulmonary function by means of diaphragm and lung ultrasonography(LUS)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
sedation score10min and 30min after extubationsedation score OAAS
duration of hospitalization30 days after surgeryduration of hospitalization
dosage of intravenous and inhaling sedative drug, analgesia drug, NMBAs30 days after surgerydosage of intravenous and inhaling sedative drug, analgesia drug, NMBAs
duration of surgery and anesthesia30 days after surgeryduration of surgery and anesthesia

Contacts

Primary ContactCHEN YING
ddlondon@163.com+8619801103037

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026