Skip to content

A Prospective, Single-Arm Multi-Center Study of the HARMONIC® 1100 Shears in Select Devices

A Prospective, Single-Arm Multi-Center Study of the HARMONIC® 1100 Shears and Generator G11 in Pediatric Surgical Procedures (General) and Adult Surgical Procedures (General, Gynecological, Urological, and Thoracic)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05039021
Enrollment
265
Registered
2021-09-09
Start date
2021-07-29
Completion date
2024-03-12
Last updated
2025-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adult Gastric Procedures, Adult Gynecological Procedures, Adult Hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) Procedures, Adult Lower Gastrointestinal Procedures, Adult Thoracic Procedures, Adult Urological Procedures, Pediatric Procedures

Brief summary

This prospective, single-arm, multi-center study will collect clinical data in a post-market setting for the pediatric population (general surgical procedures) and adult population (general, gynecological, urological, and thoracic surgical procedures). Investigators will perform each procedure using the device in compliance with their standard surgical approach and the HARMONIC 1100 Shears and Generator G11 instructions for use.

Interventions

DEVICEHARMONIC 1100 Shears

HARMONIC 1100 Shears is used for vessel transection according to instructions for use.

Sponsors

Ethicon Endo-Surgery
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Pediatric population: 1. Non-emergent procedure (general) where at least one vessel is planned to be transected by the HARMONIC 1100 Shears per the IFU; 2. Less than 18 years of age at the time of procedure; and 3. The subject's parent/legal guardian must be willing to give permission for the subject to participate in the study and provide written informed consent for the subject. In addition, assent must be obtained from pediatric subjects who possess the intellectual and emotional ability to comprehend the concepts involved in the study. If the pediatric subject is not able to provide assent (due to age, maturity and/or inability to intellectually and/or emotionally comprehend the study), the parent/legal guardian's written informed consent for the subject will be acceptable for the subject to be included in the study. Adult population: 1. Elective procedure (general, gynecological, urological, or thoracic) where at least one vessel is planned to be transected by the HARMONIC 1100 Shears per the IFU; 2. Willingness to give consent and comply with all study-related evaluations and visit schedule; and 3. At least 18 years of age.

Exclusion criteria

Preoperative 1. Physical or psychological condition which would impair study participation; 2. Female subjects, of childbearing age, who are pregnant; or 3. Enrollment in a concurrent interventional clinical study that could impact the study endpoints. Intraoperative 1\. The HARMONIC 1100 Shears were not attempted to be used for at least one single vessel transection during the surgical procedure.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Vessels Transected With Less Than or Equal to (<=) Grade 3 Hemostasis Based on Hemostasis Grading ScaleOn the day of transection (Day 0)Number of vessels transected with \<= Grade 3 hemostasis based on hemostasis grading scale were reported. A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels. Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with HARMONIC 1100 Shears; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (example, pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (example, hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, other advanced energy products).
Number of Participants With Device-related Adverse Events (AEs)From Day 0 up to post-procedure follow up visit (up to 28 days)Number of participants with device-related AEs were reported. Device-related AEs were those AEs identified as having a relationship of possibly, probably, or causally with the study device. Possible refers to the relationship with the use of the device is weak but cannot be ruled out completely; Probable refers to the relationship with the use of the device seems relevant and/or the event cannot reasonably be explained by another cause, but additional information may be obtained; Causal relationship refers to the event is associated with the device or with procedures beyond reasonable doubt.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Vessels Transections With Diameter >5 to 7 mm With Less Than or Equal to (<=) Grade 3 Hemostasis Based on Hemostasis Grading ScaleOn the day of transection (Day 0)Number of vessels transected with diameter \>5 to 7 mm with \<= Grade 3 hemostasis based on hemostasis grading scale were reported. A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels. Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with HARMONIC 1100 Shears; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (example, pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (example, hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, other advanced energy products).
Number of Participants Using HARMONIC 1100 Shears For Sealing and Transection of Lymphatic Vessels as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale ScoreOn the day of transection (Day 0)Number of participants using HARMONIC 1100 Shears for sealing and transection of lymphatic vessels as assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale Score were reported. Surgeon satisfaction scale score is a 5-point scale (very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, satisfied, or very satisfied) where surgeon rated the use of the device for sealing and transection of lymphatic vessel by HARMONIC 1100 Shears.
Number of Vessels Transected With Hemostasis (Grade 1 to 4) Based on Hemostasis Grading ScaleOn the day of transection (Day 0)Number of vessels transected with hemostasis (Grade 1 to 4) based on hemostasis grading scale was reported. A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels. Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with HARMONIC 1100 Shears; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (example, pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (example, hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, other advanced energy products).
Number of Grade 4 Vessel Transections Requiring Hemostasis MeasuresOn the day of transection (Day 0)Number of Grade 4 vessel transections requiring hemostasis measures such as hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, adjunctive topical hemostats (except fibrin sealants), other advanced energy products and other products were reported. A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels. Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with HARMONIC 1100 Shears; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, adjunctive topical hemostats (except fibrin sealants), other advanced energy products). Since multiple responses were collected, sum of the data of each category exceeds the overall number of units analyzed.

Countries

Canada, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
HARMONIC 1100 Shears
HARMONIC 1100 Shears was used per the Instructions for use (IFUs) in pediatric surgical procedures (general) or adult surgical procedures (general, gynecological, urological, and thoracic) where at least one single vessel was transected.
265
Total265

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath1
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHARMONIC 1100 Shears
Age, Continuous53.73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.793
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
224 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
36 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
29 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
213 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
158 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
107 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 265
other
Total, other adverse events
69 / 265
serious
Total, serious adverse events
16 / 265

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Device-related Adverse Events (AEs)

Number of participants with device-related AEs were reported. Device-related AEs were those AEs identified as having a relationship of possibly, probably, or causally with the study device. Possible refers to the relationship with the use of the device is weak but cannot be ruled out completely; Probable refers to the relationship with the use of the device seems relevant and/or the event cannot reasonably be explained by another cause, but additional information may be obtained; Causal relationship refers to the event is associated with the device or with procedures beyond reasonable doubt.

Time frame: From Day 0 up to post-procedure follow up visit (up to 28 days)

Population: Safety analysis set included participants in whom the HARMONIC 1100 Shears was utilized during the surgical procedure to transect at least one vessel.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HARMONIC 1100 ShearsNumber of Participants With Device-related Adverse Events (AEs)5 Participants
Primary

Number of Vessels Transected With Less Than or Equal to (<=) Grade 3 Hemostasis Based on Hemostasis Grading Scale

Number of vessels transected with \<= Grade 3 hemostasis based on hemostasis grading scale were reported. A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels. Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with HARMONIC 1100 Shears; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (example, pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (example, hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, other advanced energy products).

Time frame: On the day of transection (Day 0)

Population: Full analysis set included participants in whom the HARMONIC 1100 Shears was utilized during the surgical procedure to transect at least one vessel. Here, Overall number of units analyzed signifies total number of vessels transected and analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
HARMONIC 1100 ShearsNumber of Vessels Transected With Less Than or Equal to (<=) Grade 3 Hemostasis Based on Hemostasis Grading Scale484 Vessels transected
Secondary

Number of Grade 4 Vessel Transections Requiring Hemostasis Measures

Number of Grade 4 vessel transections requiring hemostasis measures such as hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, adjunctive topical hemostats (except fibrin sealants), other advanced energy products and other products were reported. A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels. Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with HARMONIC 1100 Shears; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, adjunctive topical hemostats (except fibrin sealants), other advanced energy products). Since multiple responses were collected, sum of the data of each category exceeds the overall number of units analyzed.

Time frame: On the day of transection (Day 0)

Population: Full analysis set included participants in whom the HARMONIC 1100 Shears was utilized during the surgical procedure to transect at least one vessel. Here, 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, Overall number of units analyzed signifies Grade 4 vessels transections.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
HARMONIC 1100 ShearsNumber of Grade 4 Vessel Transections Requiring Hemostasis MeasuresSutures0 Vessels transected
HARMONIC 1100 ShearsNumber of Grade 4 Vessel Transections Requiring Hemostasis MeasuresHemoclips4 Vessels transected
HARMONIC 1100 ShearsNumber of Grade 4 Vessel Transections Requiring Hemostasis MeasuresStaples1 Vessels transected
HARMONIC 1100 ShearsNumber of Grade 4 Vessel Transections Requiring Hemostasis MeasuresFibrin Sealants0 Vessels transected
HARMONIC 1100 ShearsNumber of Grade 4 Vessel Transections Requiring Hemostasis MeasuresAdjunctive Topical Hemostats (except Fibrin Sealants)1 Vessels transected
HARMONIC 1100 ShearsNumber of Grade 4 Vessel Transections Requiring Hemostasis MeasuresOther Advanced Energy Products1 Vessels transected
HARMONIC 1100 ShearsNumber of Grade 4 Vessel Transections Requiring Hemostasis MeasuresOther1 Vessels transected
Secondary

Number of Participants Using HARMONIC 1100 Shears For Sealing and Transection of Lymphatic Vessels as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale Score

Number of participants using HARMONIC 1100 Shears for sealing and transection of lymphatic vessels as assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale Score were reported. Surgeon satisfaction scale score is a 5-point scale (very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, satisfied, or very satisfied) where surgeon rated the use of the device for sealing and transection of lymphatic vessel by HARMONIC 1100 Shears.

Time frame: On the day of transection (Day 0)

Population: Analysis population included participants in FAS with sealing and transection of lymphatic vessels by HARMONIC 1100 Shears.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HARMONIC 1100 ShearsNumber of Participants Using HARMONIC 1100 Shears For Sealing and Transection of Lymphatic Vessels as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale ScoreNeither Satisfied or Dissatisfied0 Participants
HARMONIC 1100 ShearsNumber of Participants Using HARMONIC 1100 Shears For Sealing and Transection of Lymphatic Vessels as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale ScoreVery Satisfied76 Participants
HARMONIC 1100 ShearsNumber of Participants Using HARMONIC 1100 Shears For Sealing and Transection of Lymphatic Vessels as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale ScoreSatisfied25 Participants
HARMONIC 1100 ShearsNumber of Participants Using HARMONIC 1100 Shears For Sealing and Transection of Lymphatic Vessels as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale ScoreDissatisfied0 Participants
HARMONIC 1100 ShearsNumber of Participants Using HARMONIC 1100 Shears For Sealing and Transection of Lymphatic Vessels as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale ScoreVery Dissatisfied3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Vessels Transected With Hemostasis (Grade 1 to 4) Based on Hemostasis Grading Scale

Number of vessels transected with hemostasis (Grade 1 to 4) based on hemostasis grading scale was reported. A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels. Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with HARMONIC 1100 Shears; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (example, pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (example, hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, other advanced energy products).

Time frame: On the day of transection (Day 0)

Population: Full analysis set included participants in whom the HARMONIC 1100 Shears was utilized during the surgical procedure to transect at least one vessel. Here, Overall number of units analyzed signifies total number of vessels transected and analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
HARMONIC 1100 ShearsNumber of Vessels Transected With Hemostasis (Grade 1 to 4) Based on Hemostasis Grading ScaleGrade 1475 Vessels transected
HARMONIC 1100 ShearsNumber of Vessels Transected With Hemostasis (Grade 1 to 4) Based on Hemostasis Grading ScaleGrade 22 Vessels transected
HARMONIC 1100 ShearsNumber of Vessels Transected With Hemostasis (Grade 1 to 4) Based on Hemostasis Grading ScaleGrade 37 Vessels transected
HARMONIC 1100 ShearsNumber of Vessels Transected With Hemostasis (Grade 1 to 4) Based on Hemostasis Grading ScaleGrade 45 Vessels transected
Secondary

Number of Vessels Transections With Diameter >5 to 7 mm With Less Than or Equal to (<=) Grade 3 Hemostasis Based on Hemostasis Grading Scale

Number of vessels transected with diameter \>5 to 7 mm with \<= Grade 3 hemostasis based on hemostasis grading scale were reported. A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels. Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with HARMONIC 1100 Shears; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (example, pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (example, hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, other advanced energy products).

Time frame: On the day of transection (Day 0)

Population: Full analysis set included participants in whom the HARMONIC 1100 Shears was utilized during the surgical procedure to transect at least one vessel. Here, Overall number of units analyzed signifies total number of vessels transected and analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
HARMONIC 1100 ShearsNumber of Vessels Transections With Diameter >5 to 7 mm With Less Than or Equal to (<=) Grade 3 Hemostasis Based on Hemostasis Grading Scale174 Vessels transected

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026