Adult Gastric Procedures, Adult Gynecological Procedures, Adult Hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) Procedures, Adult Lower Gastrointestinal Procedures, Adult Thoracic Procedures, Adult Urological Procedures, Pediatric Procedures
Conditions
Brief summary
This prospective, single-arm, multi-center study will collect clinical data in a post-market setting for the pediatric population (general surgical procedures) and adult population (general, gynecological, urological, and thoracic surgical procedures). Investigators will perform each procedure using the device in compliance with their standard surgical approach and the HARMONIC 1100 Shears and Generator G11 instructions for use.
Interventions
HARMONIC 1100 Shears is used for vessel transection according to instructions for use.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Pediatric population: 1. Non-emergent procedure (general) where at least one vessel is planned to be transected by the HARMONIC 1100 Shears per the IFU; 2. Less than 18 years of age at the time of procedure; and 3. The subject's parent/legal guardian must be willing to give permission for the subject to participate in the study and provide written informed consent for the subject. In addition, assent must be obtained from pediatric subjects who possess the intellectual and emotional ability to comprehend the concepts involved in the study. If the pediatric subject is not able to provide assent (due to age, maturity and/or inability to intellectually and/or emotionally comprehend the study), the parent/legal guardian's written informed consent for the subject will be acceptable for the subject to be included in the study. Adult population: 1. Elective procedure (general, gynecological, urological, or thoracic) where at least one vessel is planned to be transected by the HARMONIC 1100 Shears per the IFU; 2. Willingness to give consent and comply with all study-related evaluations and visit schedule; and 3. At least 18 years of age.
Exclusion criteria
Preoperative 1. Physical or psychological condition which would impair study participation; 2. Female subjects, of childbearing age, who are pregnant; or 3. Enrollment in a concurrent interventional clinical study that could impact the study endpoints. Intraoperative 1\. The HARMONIC 1100 Shears were not attempted to be used for at least one single vessel transection during the surgical procedure.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Vessels Transected With Less Than or Equal to (<=) Grade 3 Hemostasis Based on Hemostasis Grading Scale | On the day of transection (Day 0) | Number of vessels transected with \<= Grade 3 hemostasis based on hemostasis grading scale were reported. A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels. Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with HARMONIC 1100 Shears; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (example, pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (example, hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, other advanced energy products). |
| Number of Participants With Device-related Adverse Events (AEs) | From Day 0 up to post-procedure follow up visit (up to 28 days) | Number of participants with device-related AEs were reported. Device-related AEs were those AEs identified as having a relationship of possibly, probably, or causally with the study device. Possible refers to the relationship with the use of the device is weak but cannot be ruled out completely; Probable refers to the relationship with the use of the device seems relevant and/or the event cannot reasonably be explained by another cause, but additional information may be obtained; Causal relationship refers to the event is associated with the device or with procedures beyond reasonable doubt. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Vessels Transections With Diameter >5 to 7 mm With Less Than or Equal to (<=) Grade 3 Hemostasis Based on Hemostasis Grading Scale | On the day of transection (Day 0) | Number of vessels transected with diameter \>5 to 7 mm with \<= Grade 3 hemostasis based on hemostasis grading scale were reported. A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels. Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with HARMONIC 1100 Shears; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (example, pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (example, hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, other advanced energy products). |
| Number of Participants Using HARMONIC 1100 Shears For Sealing and Transection of Lymphatic Vessels as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale Score | On the day of transection (Day 0) | Number of participants using HARMONIC 1100 Shears for sealing and transection of lymphatic vessels as assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale Score were reported. Surgeon satisfaction scale score is a 5-point scale (very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, satisfied, or very satisfied) where surgeon rated the use of the device for sealing and transection of lymphatic vessel by HARMONIC 1100 Shears. |
| Number of Vessels Transected With Hemostasis (Grade 1 to 4) Based on Hemostasis Grading Scale | On the day of transection (Day 0) | Number of vessels transected with hemostasis (Grade 1 to 4) based on hemostasis grading scale was reported. A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels. Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with HARMONIC 1100 Shears; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (example, pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (example, hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, other advanced energy products). |
| Number of Grade 4 Vessel Transections Requiring Hemostasis Measures | On the day of transection (Day 0) | Number of Grade 4 vessel transections requiring hemostasis measures such as hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, adjunctive topical hemostats (except fibrin sealants), other advanced energy products and other products were reported. A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels. Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with HARMONIC 1100 Shears; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, adjunctive topical hemostats (except fibrin sealants), other advanced energy products). Since multiple responses were collected, sum of the data of each category exceeds the overall number of units analyzed. |
Countries
Canada, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| HARMONIC 1100 Shears HARMONIC 1100 Shears was used per the Instructions for use (IFUs) in pediatric surgical procedures (general) or adult surgical procedures (general, gynecological, urological, and thoracic) where at least one single vessel was transected. | 265 |
| Total | 265 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | HARMONIC 1100 Shears |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 53.73 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.793 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 5 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 224 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 36 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 8 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 29 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 15 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 213 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 158 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 107 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 265 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 69 / 265 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 16 / 265 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants With Device-related Adverse Events (AEs)
Number of participants with device-related AEs were reported. Device-related AEs were those AEs identified as having a relationship of possibly, probably, or causally with the study device. Possible refers to the relationship with the use of the device is weak but cannot be ruled out completely; Probable refers to the relationship with the use of the device seems relevant and/or the event cannot reasonably be explained by another cause, but additional information may be obtained; Causal relationship refers to the event is associated with the device or with procedures beyond reasonable doubt.
Time frame: From Day 0 up to post-procedure follow up visit (up to 28 days)
Population: Safety analysis set included participants in whom the HARMONIC 1100 Shears was utilized during the surgical procedure to transect at least one vessel.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| HARMONIC 1100 Shears | Number of Participants With Device-related Adverse Events (AEs) | 5 Participants |
Number of Vessels Transected With Less Than or Equal to (<=) Grade 3 Hemostasis Based on Hemostasis Grading Scale
Number of vessels transected with \<= Grade 3 hemostasis based on hemostasis grading scale were reported. A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels. Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with HARMONIC 1100 Shears; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (example, pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (example, hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, other advanced energy products).
Time frame: On the day of transection (Day 0)
Population: Full analysis set included participants in whom the HARMONIC 1100 Shears was utilized during the surgical procedure to transect at least one vessel. Here, Overall number of units analyzed signifies total number of vessels transected and analyzed for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| HARMONIC 1100 Shears | Number of Vessels Transected With Less Than or Equal to (<=) Grade 3 Hemostasis Based on Hemostasis Grading Scale | 484 Vessels transected |
Number of Grade 4 Vessel Transections Requiring Hemostasis Measures
Number of Grade 4 vessel transections requiring hemostasis measures such as hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, adjunctive topical hemostats (except fibrin sealants), other advanced energy products and other products were reported. A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels. Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with HARMONIC 1100 Shears; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, adjunctive topical hemostats (except fibrin sealants), other advanced energy products). Since multiple responses were collected, sum of the data of each category exceeds the overall number of units analyzed.
Time frame: On the day of transection (Day 0)
Population: Full analysis set included participants in whom the HARMONIC 1100 Shears was utilized during the surgical procedure to transect at least one vessel. Here, 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, Overall number of units analyzed signifies Grade 4 vessels transections.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| HARMONIC 1100 Shears | Number of Grade 4 Vessel Transections Requiring Hemostasis Measures | Sutures | 0 Vessels transected |
| HARMONIC 1100 Shears | Number of Grade 4 Vessel Transections Requiring Hemostasis Measures | Hemoclips | 4 Vessels transected |
| HARMONIC 1100 Shears | Number of Grade 4 Vessel Transections Requiring Hemostasis Measures | Staples | 1 Vessels transected |
| HARMONIC 1100 Shears | Number of Grade 4 Vessel Transections Requiring Hemostasis Measures | Fibrin Sealants | 0 Vessels transected |
| HARMONIC 1100 Shears | Number of Grade 4 Vessel Transections Requiring Hemostasis Measures | Adjunctive Topical Hemostats (except Fibrin Sealants) | 1 Vessels transected |
| HARMONIC 1100 Shears | Number of Grade 4 Vessel Transections Requiring Hemostasis Measures | Other Advanced Energy Products | 1 Vessels transected |
| HARMONIC 1100 Shears | Number of Grade 4 Vessel Transections Requiring Hemostasis Measures | Other | 1 Vessels transected |
Number of Participants Using HARMONIC 1100 Shears For Sealing and Transection of Lymphatic Vessels as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale Score
Number of participants using HARMONIC 1100 Shears for sealing and transection of lymphatic vessels as assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale Score were reported. Surgeon satisfaction scale score is a 5-point scale (very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, satisfied, or very satisfied) where surgeon rated the use of the device for sealing and transection of lymphatic vessel by HARMONIC 1100 Shears.
Time frame: On the day of transection (Day 0)
Population: Analysis population included participants in FAS with sealing and transection of lymphatic vessels by HARMONIC 1100 Shears.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| HARMONIC 1100 Shears | Number of Participants Using HARMONIC 1100 Shears For Sealing and Transection of Lymphatic Vessels as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale Score | Neither Satisfied or Dissatisfied | 0 Participants |
| HARMONIC 1100 Shears | Number of Participants Using HARMONIC 1100 Shears For Sealing and Transection of Lymphatic Vessels as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale Score | Very Satisfied | 76 Participants |
| HARMONIC 1100 Shears | Number of Participants Using HARMONIC 1100 Shears For Sealing and Transection of Lymphatic Vessels as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale Score | Satisfied | 25 Participants |
| HARMONIC 1100 Shears | Number of Participants Using HARMONIC 1100 Shears For Sealing and Transection of Lymphatic Vessels as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale Score | Dissatisfied | 0 Participants |
| HARMONIC 1100 Shears | Number of Participants Using HARMONIC 1100 Shears For Sealing and Transection of Lymphatic Vessels as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale Score | Very Dissatisfied | 3 Participants |
Number of Vessels Transected With Hemostasis (Grade 1 to 4) Based on Hemostasis Grading Scale
Number of vessels transected with hemostasis (Grade 1 to 4) based on hemostasis grading scale was reported. A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels. Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with HARMONIC 1100 Shears; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (example, pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (example, hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, other advanced energy products).
Time frame: On the day of transection (Day 0)
Population: Full analysis set included participants in whom the HARMONIC 1100 Shears was utilized during the surgical procedure to transect at least one vessel. Here, Overall number of units analyzed signifies total number of vessels transected and analyzed for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| HARMONIC 1100 Shears | Number of Vessels Transected With Hemostasis (Grade 1 to 4) Based on Hemostasis Grading Scale | Grade 1 | 475 Vessels transected |
| HARMONIC 1100 Shears | Number of Vessels Transected With Hemostasis (Grade 1 to 4) Based on Hemostasis Grading Scale | Grade 2 | 2 Vessels transected |
| HARMONIC 1100 Shears | Number of Vessels Transected With Hemostasis (Grade 1 to 4) Based on Hemostasis Grading Scale | Grade 3 | 7 Vessels transected |
| HARMONIC 1100 Shears | Number of Vessels Transected With Hemostasis (Grade 1 to 4) Based on Hemostasis Grading Scale | Grade 4 | 5 Vessels transected |
Number of Vessels Transections With Diameter >5 to 7 mm With Less Than or Equal to (<=) Grade 3 Hemostasis Based on Hemostasis Grading Scale
Number of vessels transected with diameter \>5 to 7 mm with \<= Grade 3 hemostasis based on hemostasis grading scale were reported. A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels. Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with HARMONIC 1100 Shears; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (example, pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (example, hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, other advanced energy products).
Time frame: On the day of transection (Day 0)
Population: Full analysis set included participants in whom the HARMONIC 1100 Shears was utilized during the surgical procedure to transect at least one vessel. Here, Overall number of units analyzed signifies total number of vessels transected and analyzed for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| HARMONIC 1100 Shears | Number of Vessels Transections With Diameter >5 to 7 mm With Less Than or Equal to (<=) Grade 3 Hemostasis Based on Hemostasis Grading Scale | 174 Vessels transected |