Skip to content

Journey II vs Persona Knee Systems - RCT

Comparison of Patients-reported Outcome After Total Knee Arthroplasty With Use of Bi-cruciate Stabilized and Personalized Implant Design - Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05038670
Enrollment
45
Registered
2021-09-09
Start date
2018-10-01
Completion date
2020-11-24
Last updated
2021-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

This study compares and evaluates differences in patient-reported outcome, survivorship and radiological analysis between patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty with use of either Zimmer Biomet PERSONA Posterior Stabilized (PS) system and Smith&Nephew Journey II Bi-Cruciate Stabilized (BCS) system

Detailed description

The aim of this study is to assess patient-reported outcome, survivorship and radiological analysis in patients after total knee arthroplasty, who will undergo the surgery with the use of either Zimmer Biomet PERSONA Posterior Stabilized (PS) system and Smith&Nephew Journey II Bi-Cruciate Stabilized (BCS) system. To this study 45 consecutive patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty will be recruited to each group. Study protocol is designed as a prospective, blinded, parallel-group, superiority trial, with balanced randomization \[1:1\]. All participants will be operated in single clinical orthopedic department, by single high-volume surgeon, who performed more than 3000 total knee arthroplasties in his professional career. Before the surgery patients will fulfill the author's questionnaire concerning their age, height and body mass, level of activity, WOMAC and KOOS scales. 1-day posteoperatively patients will undergo standard computed tomography examination to assess components placement

Interventions

DEVICETotal Knee Replacement

Participant will undergo total knee replacement performed via anterior parapatellar approach with either PERSONA PS or JOURNEY II BCS

Sponsors

Medical University of Warsaw
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participant will not be informed which type of prosthesis was used in their particular case. Outcomes Assessor, who will be not present during surgery, will not be informed which type of prosthesis was used in particular patient.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Listed for a primary total knee replacement (TKR) at the Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Department Medical University of Warsaw * Indication for the TKR is primary osteoarthritis of the knee joint involving one or more compartments * Aged 18 or over * Patient willing to provide full informed consent to the trial

Exclusion criteria

* Listed for a single-stage bilateral TKR procedure * Severe symptoms in the contralateral knee so as to require staged bilateral knee replacements within 6 months of the primary procedure * Fixed flexion deformity of 15 degrees or greater who will require excessive resection of the distal femur * Clinically assessed uncorrectable varus/valgus deformity of 15 degrees or greater * Any co-morbidity which, in the opinion of the investigator, is severe enough to present an unacceptable risk to the patient's safety * Inflammatory arthritis * Previous septic arthritis in the affected knee joint * Previous surgery to the collateral ligaments of the affected knee * Patients on warfarin or novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) * Will not be resident in the catchment area for at least 6 months post-surgery * Undertaking the surgery as a private patient * Patients who, in the opinion of the clinical staff, do not have capacity to consent * Patients who are pregnant * Unable to understand written and spoken Polish

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in patients reported outcome measures - KOOS Score (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score)baseline (preoperatively) and 1 year postoperativelyTo explore differences between outcome in patients treated with use of with Journey II and Persona prosthesis. Results range from 0 to 100, with higher scores corresponding to better outcomes.
Changes in patients reported outcome measures - WOMAC Score (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score)baseline (preoperatively) and 1 year postoperativelyTo explore differences between outcome in patients treated with use of with Journey II and Persona prosthesis. Results range from 0 to 96, with higher scores corresponding to worse outcomes.
Values of components rotation1-day postoperativelyValues of external or internal rotation of components measured in computed tomography postoperatively. Values in degrees in regards to anatomic bone landmarks

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026