Skip to content

Dexterous Partial Hand Prosthesis Outcomes

Dexterous Partial Hand Prosthesis Outcomes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05038566
Enrollment
4
Registered
2021-09-09
Start date
2021-07-15
Completion date
2022-04-28
Last updated
2025-01-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amputation, Amputation; Traumatic, Hand, Limb; Absence, Congenital, Upper, Prosthesis User, Upper Limb Amputation at the Hand

Keywords

amputee, upper limb amputee, partial hand prosthesis user, prosthesis, i-Digits, upper limb loss, prosthetist, gripper, dexterous fingertip, index finger prosthesis

Brief summary

Liberating Technologies, Inc. (LTI) has developed a dexterous prosthetic fingertip that will be fit onto an i-Digits™ partial hand prosthesis and allow for an additional fine grasp. The device will interface with research participants' existing prostheses and use the same control strategy that is used for their everyday use. Each participant's prosthesis will be restored to their original configuration by the end of their testing period.

Detailed description

Liberating Technologies, Inc. (LTI) has developed a dexterous prosthetic fingertip that will be fit onto an i-Digits™ partial hand prosthesis and allow for an additional fine grasp. The device will interface with research participant's existing prostheses and use the same control strategy that is used for their everyday use. Each participant's prosthesis will be restored to their original configuration by the end of their testing period. The study will focus on design feasibility testing and will compare performance of hand functional outcome tests on an i-Digits™ prosthetic partial hand with and without the investigational Pointdexter modification. Our primary hypothesis is that subjects using the investigational device will show better performance on objective functional outcomes measures than those using a standard i-Digits™ partial hand prosthesis, particularly in the manipulation of small objects. The investigators will explore multiple outcomes measures as options, but our primary endpoint will be performance on the Small Common Objects subtask of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test, which assesses a broad range of unimanual hand functions required for ADLs. The primary quantitative measure of the Jebsen-Taylor task will be completion time of each subtask. Qualitative evaluation will be conducted by an occupational therapist via observation, and by the user through a self-assessment questionnaire, such as the Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS). The investigators will be performing repeated measures on each individual subject to reduce the variance as well as having each subject act as their own control. New and existing i-Digits™ partial hand prosthesis users will be recruited for the study and consented with an approved protocol. Research participants will schedule a time to conduct the testing and be informed of study details. The investigational device being tested is a novel prosthetic finger with a built-in split gripper. The device is an index finger which can drop in place of existing digits on an i-Digits™ partial hand prosthesis. The investigational device is controlled with the same signals as the conventional digits. This study will pilot test the dexterous fingertip prosthesis with a small number of subjects (up to 12). Research participants will be consented and will test the device at home and/or in-lab. Subjects will be introduced to the partial hand prosthesis configuration and be instructed on how to operate it to complete their testing session. The in-lab testing will be conducted in a single site visit at Össur Academy in Dublin, Ohio or LTI in Holliston, MA. Subjects may be asked to come back for an additional site visit if data collection is incomplete. For this study, the index finger of each participant's existing everyday prosthesis will be temporarily disconnected and replaced with the investigational device. The prosthesis will be restored to its original configuration when the test session has been completed. At the start of the study session, subjects will prepare for testing in their first configuration (investigational or comparator). If investigational, subjects will doff their prosthesis and investigators will replace the usual i-Digits™ index finger with the investigational device. If comparator, subjects will don their usual unmodified prosthesis. Subjects will be trained on how to operate the investigational device and be allowed a minimum of 30 minutes to practice using it until they are comfortable with proceeding. The subjects will be guided to conduct functional outcome tests that involve picking up and manipulating everyday objects (beans, coins, pegs, spoon, cloth, etc.), such as the tasks outlined in the Jebsen-Taylor and Peg Board functional tests. Each sub-task in the functional test will be scored by occupational therapist standards. After a round of functional testing is done, subjects will fill out the PSFS survey and subjective questionnaire. Subjects will then doff the prosthesis and don the next device configuration. The PSFS survey as well as user and clinician feedback are both exploratory outcome measures as the design is still in very early prototype stages. The intent of this feedback is to help iterate the design to assist in further development of the final product. Subjects will repeat the functional tests and surveys with each device configuration. After the final condition, the subject will have completed the study and their prosthesis will be restored to its usual configuration. The study session should span 3-5 hours. A subset of subjects will take home the investigational device for up to 4 weeks to provide feedback of the device when used in everyday tasks. Investigators will restore the user's prosthesis at the end of the testing period and surveys will be conducted to capture feedback. Two site visits may be required: one to initialize the study and configure the prosthesis, and two to restore the prosthesis at the study end. This feedback is also an exploratory outcome measure due to the design being in very early prototype stages. Both new and existing i-Digits™ partial hand prosthesis users will be invited to participate in the study. Research participants will schedule a time to conduct the testing and be informed of study details. Participants will be given as much time as needed to review and question the informed consent form before signing. Two different technologies will be assessed: * Investigational Device: i-Digits™ partial hand prosthesis with dexterous fingertip modification * Comparator Baseline: unmodified i-Digits™ partial hand prosthesis Persons with partial hand limb absence who are new or current i-Digits™ prosthesis users will be recruited for this study through the LTI and Össur clinician network. Prosthetists may be contacted with the need for research subjects and, if interested, will be given flyers to hand out to their patients. If subjects are interested in participating, they can call the number on the flyer to speak with investigators. In addition, previous research participants who have given permission to be contacted for future studies may be contacted directly to assess interest in participating in this study. Enrollment will be open to people of all ages, genders, races, and ethnicities. Participants must be new or current users of i-Digits™ partial hand prostheses. The user must have an absent index finger at minimum. Patients who have 4-5 digit and/or thumb involvement will be preferred. Based on subject population and availability, a convenience sample of up to 12 subjects will be recruited for this pilot study.

Interventions

i-Digits partial hand prosthesis modified with the investigational pointdexter finger in place of the usual index finger.

Sponsors

Össur Iceland ehf
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Liberating Technologies, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Functional tests will be used to evaluate the feasibility of the device design as compared with the subject's baseline device.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Must have an upper limb partial hand absence. * Must be new or current i-Digits prosthesis users. * Must have an absent index finger at minimum. * Must be able to understand spoken and written English in order to be properly consented and provide feedback to the study personnel. * Must be willing and able to complete outlined tasks and provide feedback on the intervention.

Exclusion criteria

* The risks to pregnant women and fetuses are unknown and therefore pregnant women should not participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Jebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional Test4 hours at a single site visitDuring the in-lab portion of the study, subjects will be asked to complete the 'small common objects' subtask of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test, which assesses a broad range of unimanual hand functions required for ADLs. The primary quantitative measure of the Jebsen-Taylor task will be completion time of each subtask. The maximum time allotted for each task was 120 seconds, at which point the subject was told to stop the task and the time was reported as the maximum 120 seconds. This test will be used to evaluate the feasibility of the device design as compared with a baseline condition. This was the only primary outcome measure collected for this study. There were no secondary outcome measures, only exploratory measures as this is a very early prototype design that is still in the design iteration stages.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Comparator Baseline, Then Pointdexter (~4 Hours of In-lab Testing)
The subject wears their usual partial hand prosthesis while performing functional outcome measures. The subject then wears a modified version of their usual partial hand prosthesis. The modification replaces the usual index finger of the partial hand prosthesis with the investigational Pointdexter device. Subjects will either test out this hand configuration in the lab while performing functional outcome measures. The subject may then choose to take home the Pointdexter device for up to 4 weeks for feasibility testing of the early stage prototype device. Pointdexter: i-Digits partial hand prosthesis modified with the investigational pointdexter finger in place of the usual index finger.
2
Pointdexter, Then Comparator Baseline (~4 Hours of In-lab Testing)
The subject wears a modified version of their usual partial hand prosthesis. The modification replaces the usual index finger of the partial hand prosthesis with the investigational Pointdexter device. Subjects will test out this hand configuration in the lab while performing functional outcome measures. The subject then wears their usual partial hand prosthesis while performing functional outcome measures. The subject may then choose to take home the Pointdexter device for up to 4 weeks for feasibility testing of the early stage prototype device. Pointdexter: i-Digits partial hand prosthesis modified with the investigational pointdexter finger in place of the usual index finger.
2
Total4

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyTechnical Difficulties with the Device01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicComparator Baseline, Then Pointdexter (~4 Hours of In-lab Testing)Pointdexter, Then Comparator Baseline (~4 Hours of In-lab Testing)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 40 / 4
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 40 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 40 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

Jebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional Test

During the in-lab portion of the study, subjects will be asked to complete the 'small common objects' subtask of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test, which assesses a broad range of unimanual hand functions required for ADLs. The primary quantitative measure of the Jebsen-Taylor task will be completion time of each subtask. The maximum time allotted for each task was 120 seconds, at which point the subject was told to stop the task and the time was reported as the maximum 120 seconds. This test will be used to evaluate the feasibility of the device design as compared with a baseline condition. This was the only primary outcome measure collected for this study. There were no secondary outcome measures, only exploratory measures as this is a very early prototype design that is still in the design iteration stages.

Time frame: 4 hours at a single site visit

Population: One participant was excluded from analysis due to an incomplete session because of technical difficulties with the device

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comparator BaselineJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestTurning a Card Over34.8 SecondsStandard Deviation 20.5
Comparator BaselineJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestSmall Common Objects97.2 SecondsStandard Deviation 32.2
Comparator BaselineJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestStacking Checkers37.5 SecondsStandard Deviation 43.1
Comparator BaselineJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestManipulating Cloth5.4 SecondsStandard Deviation 1.5
Comparator BaselineJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestHolding a Screw24.1 SecondsStandard Deviation 1.8
Comparator BaselineJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional Test9-Hole Out11.4 SecondsStandard Deviation 8.1
Comparator BaselineJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional Test9-Hole In120 SecondsStandard Deviation 0
Comparator BaselineJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestRemoving Pen Cap5.8 SecondsStandard Deviation 2.3
Comparator BaselineJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestTying Shoe Laces50.5 SecondsStandard Deviation 49
Comparator BaselineJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestZipping a Zipper32.6 SecondsStandard Deviation 10.2
Comparator BaselineJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestThreading a Needle120 SecondsStandard Deviation 0
Comparator BaselineJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestSimulated Feeding30.1 SecondsStandard Deviation 22
Comparator BaselineJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestLarge Light Objects11.7 SecondsStandard Deviation 4.2
Comparator BaselineJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestLarge Heavy Objects17.8 SecondsStandard Deviation 4.6
PointdexterJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestThreading a Needle32.4 SecondsStandard Deviation 8.1
PointdexterJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestTurning a Card Over26.1 SecondsStandard Deviation 4.5
PointdexterJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestRemoving Pen Cap7.1 SecondsStandard Deviation 4.2
PointdexterJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestSmall Common Objects62.1 SecondsStandard Deviation 2.2
PointdexterJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestLarge Light Objects14.3 SecondsStandard Deviation 3.7
PointdexterJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestStacking Checkers28 SecondsStandard Deviation 21.8
PointdexterJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestTying Shoe Laces34.6 SecondsStandard Deviation 1.1
PointdexterJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestManipulating Cloth5.8 SecondsStandard Deviation 1.7
PointdexterJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestSimulated Feeding66.3 SecondsStandard Deviation 76
PointdexterJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestHolding a Screw65.7 SecondsStandard Deviation 34.7
PointdexterJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestZipping a Zipper120 SecondsStandard Deviation 0
PointdexterJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional Test9-Hole Out23.3 SecondsStandard Deviation 19
PointdexterJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional TestLarge Heavy Objects16.7 SecondsStandard Deviation 5
PointdexterJebsen-Taylor Small Common Objects Functional Test9-Hole In63.8 SecondsStandard Deviation 57.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026