Skip to content

Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrated Medicine Handbook for Self Care at Work

Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrated Medicine Handbook for Self Care at Work Survey

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05038384
Enrollment
0
Registered
2021-09-09
Start date
2020-12-03
Completion date
2023-03-30
Last updated
2023-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm, Malignant Solid Neoplasm

Brief summary

This study investigates the usefulness of the Self Care at Work Handbook in order to generate an improved version. Information from this study may help researchers identify potential factors associated with perception and usefulness of the Self Care at Work Handbook.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To explore the global perception of the perceived usefulness of the handbook, and the frequency that the handbook is consulted. II. To explore the perceived usefulness of and adherence to each individual item of the handbook. III. To solicit personnel for their ideas about the handbook, and particularly any additional handbook items they might suggest. IV. To explore any relationships between the actual use or the perceived importance of each handbook item with respondents' self-reported professional satisfaction. V. To explore any associations between responses to handbook items and professional, demographic, and work satisfaction characteristics before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis. VI. To explore respondents' global perceptions of the usefulness and adherence to the handbook before and during the COVID-19 crisis. OUTLINE: Participants complete a survey over 20 minutes.

Interventions

OTHERSurvey Administration

Complete survey

Sponsors

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Clinicians in the Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine. This includes physicians, advanced practice providers (APPs), and other clinical staff in the Supportive Care Center and Acute Palliative Care Unit

Exclusion criteria

No

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global perception of usefulnessthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearWill be assessed by survey question E, which has five options: very useful, useful, neither useful nor useless, useless and very useless. The main interest is the proportion of responders who select very useful and useful.
Frequency of consultationthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearWill be assessed by survey question D, which has five options: never, once a month or less, a few times a month, a few times a week and daily. The main interest is the proportion of responders who select daily and a few times a week.
Perceived usefulness of individual itemsthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearWill be assessed by survey question F 1-9. Frequency and proportion will be used to summarize each item. For responders who select neither useful nor useless, useless and very useless, additional questions about whether one item should be retained, discarded or modified will be summarized using frequency and proportion. Comments or suggestions will be collected for qualitative analysis.
Adherence to individual itemsthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearWill be assessed by survey question G 1-9. Frequency and proportion will be used to summarize each item. For responders who select neither useful nor useless, useless and very useless, additional questions about whether one item should be retained, discarded or modified will be summarized using frequency and proportion. Comments or suggestions will be collected for qualitative analysis.
Personal ideas about the handbookthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearWill be collected by survey question I and question J. Comments and suggestions will be collected and used to aggregate opinions toward handbook improvement.
Responders' self-reported professional satisfactionthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearWill be assessed by survey question K, L1, and L3. Association between the perceived usefulness and professional satisfaction will be evaluated by Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test whichever appropriate. Association between the adherence and professional satisfaction will be evaluated by Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test whichever appropriate.
Responders' professionthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearWill be summarized by survey question A, and responders' demographics will be summarized by survey question B and C. Responders' work satisfaction after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) will be examined by survey question L2 and L4. Association between the perceived usefulness and responders' profession/demographics/work satisfaction after COVID-19 will be evaluated by Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test whichever appropriate. Association between the adherence and responders' profession/demographics/work satisfaction after COVID-19 will be evaluated by Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test whichever appropriate.
Responders' global perceptions of usefulness and adherence to the handbook during COVID-19through study completion, an average of 1 yearWill be assessed by survey question M, N and O, and frequency and proportion will be used to summarize the results.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026