Skip to content

Time Restricted Eating on Cancer Risk

The Effects of Time Restricted Feeding on AGE-RAGE Signaling in Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05038137
Acronym
TREC
Enrollment
29
Registered
2021-09-08
Start date
2022-05-04
Completion date
2024-04-23
Last updated
2026-06-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, Pre-diabetes, Time Restricted Feeding

Brief summary

Participants will be randomly assigned to either the time restricted feeding group with a daily eating period of 8 hours or the control group with a daily eating period of greater than or equal to 12 hours. There are 2 in-person study visits to have blood, urine and vital signs collected and 8 remote or phone visits with a psychologist or dietician to assist with the eating schedule. The study will take last 3 1/2 months.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTime restricted feeding

Participants will eat all food during a self selected 8 hour eating window prior to 8:00 PM.

BEHAVIORALControl

Participants will have a daily eating period equal to or greater than 12 hours.

Sponsors

Medical University of South Carolina
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Visit 1 at 0 weeks, followed by 2 week run-in and then randomization. Visit 2 at 14 weeks.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to 67 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 40 and ≤ 67; * Postmenopausal women (no menstrual periods in the preceding 12 or more months) with pre-diabetes (A1C 5.7-6.4% and/or fasting glucose 100-125 mg/dL). A1c lab and/or fasting glucose criteria will need to be met within 12 months of signing consent form, can be obtained from prior lab result or study prescreening testing; * Own a smart phone with internet connection and capable of receiving and sending text messages and taking photographs;

Exclusion criteria

* Tobacco use (current or within last 2 years); * Active malignancy or history of cancer; * History of known liver disease (by serology: aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase ≥ 3 times above upper limit of normal determined by lab review, imaging or biopsy: determined by patient history); * History of kidney disease (patient history and/or estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 45 mL/min/1.73m²); * History of diabetes mellitus: * History of cardiovascular disease (MI, CHF); * Current prescription medication use for diabetes; * Medication affecting glucose metabolism or appetite or immunosuppression; * Dietary restrictions: currently following vegetarian or vegan dietary pattern; * Currently following intermittent fasting or time restricted feeding pattern or use in the last 3 months; * Night shift worker (work schedule does not involve any period of work from 10 PM to 5 AM either on a regular or rotating basis); * History of weight loss \>5% in the last 3 months; * History of weight loss surgery. * BMI≥40 kg/m² exclusion; * After informed consent and run in period: Insufficient documented food photography/annotated entries (does not log at least two entries a day for 10 of 14 days) during run in period will be excluded from randomization in to the intervention period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Advanced Glycation End Products (AGE) as Assessed by PlasmaVisit 1 (0 weeks), Visit 2 (14 weeks)Estimated mean levels within the intervention and the control groups of the study. Effect size will be estimated via 95% confidence intervals within and between groups.
Change in sRAGE(Soluble Receptor for AGE) LevelsVisit 1 (0 weeks), Visit 2 (14 weeks)Estimated mean levels within the intervention and the control groups of the study. Effect size will estimated via 95% confidence intervals within and between groups.
Assess Feasibility and Adherence to Time Period of Eating Recommendations in Both Study Groups.Visit 1 (0 weeks), Visit 2 (14 weeks)Percentage of dietary visits that participant reported compliance with randomized eating period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Fasting Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) LevelsVisit 1 (0 weeks), Visit 2 (14 weeks)Estimated mean levels within the intervention and the control groups of the study. Effect size will be estimated via 95% confidence intervals within and between groups.
Change in Fasting Insulin LevelsVisit 1 (0 weeks), Visit 2 (14 weeks)Estimated mean levels within the intervention and the control groups of the study. Effect size will be estimated via 95% confidence intervals within and between groups.
Difference in Glasgow Prognostic Scoring SystemVisit 1 (0 weeks), Visit 2 (14 weeks)The Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) reflects systemic inflammatory process. GPS is a three-tiered score \[0: normal C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin; 1: one abnormal result; 2: increased CRP and low albumin\]. Higher score means worse outcome.
Change in 24 Hour Urinary AGE LevelsVisit 1 (0 weeks), Visit 2 (14 weeks)Estimated mean levels within the intervention and the control groups of the study. Effect size will be estimated by the 95% confidence intervals within and between groups.
Adherence to Virtual Visit With Psychologist or DieticianVisit 1 (0 weeks), Visit 2 (14 weeks)Percentage of expected visits attended.
Adherence to Time Period of Eating Recommendation in Both Study Groups: Self Reporting During Virtual Visits and Through Food Photography / Annotated Entries.Visit 1 (0 weeks), Visit 2 (14 weeks)Proportion of dietary visits where participants reported compliance with randomized eating period, assessed through self-report during virtual visits and via food photography/annotated entries.
Percentage of Participants With Stable Chronotype Between Baseline and End of StudyVisit 1 (0 weeks), Visit 2 (14 weeks)Stability in chronotype (normal, delayed, or advanced) was assessed using 2-week sleep diaries at baseline and end of study. Stability was defined as no change in chronotype classification between Visit 1 and Visit 2.
Mean Glucose at Visit 2Final 14 days of intervention period (Visit 2).Mean glucose level calculated as the average of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data collected during the final 14 days of the intervention period (Visit 2).
Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) at Visit 2Visit 2 (14 weeks)GMI percentage derived from CGM data collected during the final 14 days of the intervention period (Visit 2).
Glucose Variability at Visit 2Visit 2 (14 weeks)Coefficient of variation of glucose levels derived from CGM data during the final 14 days of the intervention period (Visit 2).

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORHarsha Karanchi, MD

Medical University of South Carolina

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Time Restricted Feeding
daily eating period of 8 hours, before 8 PM Time restricted feeding: Participants will eat all food during a self selected 8 hour eating window prior to 8:00 PM.
15
Control
daily eating period ≥ 12 hours Control: Participants will have a daily eating period equal to or greater than 12 hours.
14
Total29

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlTotalTime Restricted Feeding
Age, Continuous58.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
58.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
58.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants11 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants18 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 participants29 participants15 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants29 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 150 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Assess Feasibility and Adherence to Time Period of Eating Recommendations in Both Study Groups.

Percentage of dietary visits that participant reported compliance with randomized eating period.

Time frame: Visit 1 (0 weeks), Visit 2 (14 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Time Restricted FeedingAssess Feasibility and Adherence to Time Period of Eating Recommendations in Both Study Groups.90.1 Percentage of visits
ControlAssess Feasibility and Adherence to Time Period of Eating Recommendations in Both Study Groups.83.3 Percentage of visits
Primary

Change in Advanced Glycation End Products (AGE) as Assessed by Plasma

Estimated mean levels within the intervention and the control groups of the study. Effect size will be estimated via 95% confidence intervals within and between groups.

Time frame: Visit 1 (0 weeks), Visit 2 (14 weeks)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Time Restricted FeedingChange in Advanced Glycation End Products (AGE) as Assessed by PlasmaVisit 1 (0 weeks)5.82 ng/mL
Time Restricted FeedingChange in Advanced Glycation End Products (AGE) as Assessed by PlasmaVisit 2 (14 weeks)5.82 ng/mL
ControlChange in Advanced Glycation End Products (AGE) as Assessed by PlasmaVisit 1 (0 weeks)6.38 ng/mL
ControlChange in Advanced Glycation End Products (AGE) as Assessed by PlasmaVisit 2 (14 weeks)6.40 ng/mL
Primary

Change in sRAGE(Soluble Receptor for AGE) Levels

Estimated mean levels within the intervention and the control groups of the study. Effect size will estimated via 95% confidence intervals within and between groups.

Time frame: Visit 1 (0 weeks), Visit 2 (14 weeks)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Time Restricted FeedingChange in sRAGE(Soluble Receptor for AGE) LevelsVisit 1 (0 weeks)2.77 ng/mL
Time Restricted FeedingChange in sRAGE(Soluble Receptor for AGE) LevelsVisit 2 (14 weeks)2.64 ng/mL
ControlChange in sRAGE(Soluble Receptor for AGE) LevelsVisit 1 (0 weeks)2.65 ng/mL
ControlChange in sRAGE(Soluble Receptor for AGE) LevelsVisit 2 (14 weeks)2.58 ng/mL
Secondary

Adherence to Time Period of Eating Recommendation in Both Study Groups: Self Reporting During Virtual Visits and Through Food Photography / Annotated Entries.

Proportion of dietary visits where participants reported compliance with randomized eating period, assessed through self-report during virtual visits and via food photography/annotated entries.

Time frame: Visit 1 (0 weeks), Visit 2 (14 weeks)

Secondary

Adherence to Virtual Visit With Psychologist or Dietician

Percentage of expected visits attended.

Time frame: Visit 1 (0 weeks), Visit 2 (14 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Time Restricted FeedingAdherence to Virtual Visit With Psychologist or Dietician97.5 Percentage
ControlAdherence to Virtual Visit With Psychologist or Dietician98.2 Percentage
Secondary

Change in 24 Hour Urinary AGE Levels

Estimated mean levels within the intervention and the control groups of the study. Effect size will be estimated by the 95% confidence intervals within and between groups.

Time frame: Visit 1 (0 weeks), Visit 2 (14 weeks)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Time Restricted FeedingChange in 24 Hour Urinary AGE LevelsVisit 1 (0 weeks)6.51 ng/mL
Time Restricted FeedingChange in 24 Hour Urinary AGE LevelsVisit 2 (14 weeks)5.82 ng/mL
ControlChange in 24 Hour Urinary AGE LevelsVisit 2 (14 weeks)6.02 ng/mL
ControlChange in 24 Hour Urinary AGE LevelsVisit 1 (0 weeks)6.69 ng/mL
Secondary

Change in Fasting Insulin Levels

Estimated mean levels within the intervention and the control groups of the study. Effect size will be estimated via 95% confidence intervals within and between groups.

Time frame: Visit 1 (0 weeks), Visit 2 (14 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Time Restricted FeedingChange in Fasting Insulin Levels-0.6 µU/ml
ControlChange in Fasting Insulin Levels1.0 µU/ml
Secondary

Change in Fasting Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) Levels

Estimated mean levels within the intervention and the control groups of the study. Effect size will be estimated via 95% confidence intervals within and between groups.

Time frame: Visit 1 (0 weeks), Visit 2 (14 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Time Restricted FeedingChange in Fasting Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) Levels2.5 ng/mlStandard Deviation 24
ControlChange in Fasting Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) Levels.01 ng/mlStandard Deviation 16
Secondary

Difference in Glasgow Prognostic Scoring System

The Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) reflects systemic inflammatory process. GPS is a three-tiered score \[0: normal C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin; 1: one abnormal result; 2: increased CRP and low albumin\]. Higher score means worse outcome.

Time frame: Visit 1 (0 weeks), Visit 2 (14 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Time Restricted FeedingDifference in Glasgow Prognostic Scoring System0 score on a scale
ControlDifference in Glasgow Prognostic Scoring System0 score on a scale
Secondary

Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) at Visit 2

GMI percentage derived from CGM data collected during the final 14 days of the intervention period (Visit 2).

Time frame: Visit 2 (14 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Time Restricted FeedingGlucose Management Indicator (GMI) at Visit 26 percentage
ControlGlucose Management Indicator (GMI) at Visit 25.8 percentage
Secondary

Glucose Variability at Visit 2

Coefficient of variation of glucose levels derived from CGM data during the final 14 days of the intervention period (Visit 2).

Time frame: Visit 2 (14 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Time Restricted FeedingGlucose Variability at Visit 218 percentage
ControlGlucose Variability at Visit 217.6 percentage
Secondary

Mean Glucose at Visit 2

Mean glucose level calculated as the average of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data collected during the final 14 days of the intervention period (Visit 2).

Time frame: Final 14 days of intervention period (Visit 2).

Population: All randomized participants who completed CGM monitoring during the final 14 days of the intervention period were included in the analysis. Mean glucose was calculated as the average of all CGM readings during this period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Time Restricted FeedingMean Glucose at Visit 2113.8 mg/dL
ControlMean Glucose at Visit 2101.9 mg/dL
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Stable Chronotype Between Baseline and End of Study

Stability in chronotype (normal, delayed, or advanced) was assessed using 2-week sleep diaries at baseline and end of study. Stability was defined as no change in chronotype classification between Visit 1 and Visit 2.

Time frame: Visit 1 (0 weeks), Visit 2 (14 weeks)

Population: All randomized participants who completed both baseline and end-of-study sleep diaries were included in the analysis. Stability was defined as no change in chronotype classification between Visit 1 and Visit 2.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Time Restricted FeedingPercentage of Participants With Stable Chronotype Between Baseline and End of Study0.923 % of participants with stable chronotype
ControlPercentage of Participants With Stable Chronotype Between Baseline and End of Study0.857 % of participants with stable chronotype

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 3, 2026