Skip to content

Malignant Hyperthermia in Czech Republic: Description of the Biggest Slavonic Group of Patients Investigated for Risk of Malignant Hyperthermia

Malignant Hyperthermia in Czech Republic: Description of the Biggest Slavonic Group of Patients Investigated for Risk of Malignant Hyperthermia (MH): Retrospective MH Registry Analysis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05036148
Acronym
MHCZECH
Enrollment
286
Registered
2021-09-05
Start date
2021-09-01
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2022-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malignant Hyperthermia

Keywords

Malignant Hyperthermia

Brief summary

The Academic centre for Malignant Hyperthermia of Masaryk University (ACMHMU) was established in 2021 in Brno, Czech Republic and consists of four academic departments of Medical Faculty of Masaryk University in two tertiary university hospitals, University Hospital Brno and St. Anne Faculty Hospital. These departments collaborated and operated since 2002 and since 2019 is Brno one of the of centre of EMHG (www.emhg.org). Aim of this study was to describe the Czech and Slovak (CZ-SK) cohort of MHS patients, the biggest Slavonic MHS cohort known by now, and to fill the knowledge gap about the Slavonic population in perspective of MH.

Detailed description

We evaluated every referral to the MH centre since 2002 then. IVCT results, clinical data, personal and family history and molecular genetic data, have been recorded in an electronic medical record. Potential MHS patients, probands, were investigated according to the European Malignant Hyperthermia Group (EMHG) recommendations using IVCT and/or RYR1 and CACNA1S sequence variant screening. Each proband is a representative of one unrelated family. As the diagnostic guidelines were changing in the time, so was our diagnostic algorithm with the development of new knowledge and methods. Originally before 2015, for each proband or the nearest relative in case that the index case could not be tested, MH must be confirmed/excluded by IVCT. Only with a positive IVCT positive result (MHS, MHEh, MHEc), genetic diagnosis was originated. iIn 2015, a new EMHG guideline for the diagnosis of MH was issued and significantly moved the DNA diagnosis of MH to the forefront and we started to use genetic testing as a first diagnostic step. Not finding the diagnostic variant does not exclude MH susceptibility and IVCT needs to follow for final diagnosis. IVCT has been providing according to the best practise and EMGH guidelines. So far, the genetic diagnosis of MH in the Czech Republic has been in several stages - starting with standard scoring of 33 most common causal diagnostic variants of the RYR1 gene by using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) (SALSA MLPA probemix P281-A3/P282-A3 RYR1, MRC Holand). In case of a negative result, direct sequence analysis of the RYR1 and CACNA1S gene sections followed, where the remaining causal diagnostic variants occur. Since 2021 MLPA and direct sequencing of hot spots regions of RYR1 and CACNA1S was routinely replaced by next-generation sequencing (NGS) at the level of a panel of genes associated with neuromuscular diseases (including RYR1, CACNA1S and STAC3).

Interventions

MH registry data will be screened for MH positive diagnosis

Sponsors

Masaryk University
CollaboratorOTHER
Brno University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Months to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Patients indicated to MH center for MH diagnostic

Exclusion criteria

* conditions clearly not related to MH, e.g. neuromuscular diseases * syndromes without MH risk; anaesthetic complications without MH symptoms, e.g. prolongated awakening due to deficit of cholinesterase * probands with missing data * probands with yet not closed MH diagnostic process (waiting for genetics or IVCT, myopatic patients without MH diagnostic variant where the IVCT was not recommended because of its invasivity) * non-compliant probands, who refused the diagnostic process.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
prevalence of MH in our cohort of patients20 years retrospectivelyData registry will be screened for positive MH results

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
prevalence of occurrence diagnostic variants in MHS group of patients.20 years retrospectivelyData registry will be screened for different MH gene variants
prevalence of each found diagnostic variant in our Czech-and-Slovak cohort of patients.20 years retrospectivelyData registry will be screened for each found diagnostic variant in our Czech-and-Slovak cohort of patients.

Countries

Czechia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 2, 2026