Skip to content

RCE With FMT in the Treatment of Childhood Constipation

Retrograde Colonic Enema With Fecal Microbiota Transplantation vs Retrograde Colonic Enema Only in the Treatment of Childhood Constipation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05035784
Enrollment
110
Registered
2021-09-05
Start date
2020-11-10
Completion date
2022-05-13
Last updated
2023-11-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Constipation - Functional, Fecal Microbiota Transplantation

Brief summary

Constipation is the most common complaint in childhood gastrointestinal disease, affecting an estimated 20% of the global children.The treatment strategies consist of diet control, behavioral intervention and oral and sometimes rectal laxatives. Given higher success rate and fewer side effects, the laxative PEG3350 has been considered the first choice in childhood constipation.However, effectiveness of PEG 3350 laxative is not lasting, and the use of PEG increases the risk of fecal incontinence. Additional treatment interventions are still necessary.Enema can act directly on the rectum and distal colon to quickly relieve symptoms of fecal impaction which is considered one of main source of intractable constipation. Children with fecal impaction who received enema had fewer fecal incontinence and diarrhea than children who received PEG. There have been lots of evidence that enema is effective in fecal impaction in children with functional constipation.But there are still cases of recurrences noted after enema. Fecal bacteria transplantation (FMT) is a new treatment method emerging in recent years, which is widely used in the treatment of functional gastrointestinal diseases. FMT has been proved to play a very prominent role in correcting intestinal flora disorders. By transplanting exogenous flora into the intestinal tract of patients, FMT can inhibit bacterial reproduction, regulate intestinal environment and cascade the body immunity, so as to achieve the therapeutic effect of disease. Retrograde colonic enema with FMT, an new method, provides the possibility for the treatment of childhood constipation. However, there is still a lack of evidence-based support for the treatment of childhood constipation by retrograde colonic enema with FMT. Therefore, we designed a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial to confirm the efficacy and safety of retrograde colonic enema with FMT in the treatment of childhood constipation.

Interventions

DRUGFecal supernatant

Fecal supernatant from a child registered in the specimen bank that matches the subject's age, gender, and weight .

DRUGPlacebo

a placebo designed to match the FMT+RCE group based on appearance including 0.9% physiological saline.

Sponsors

Shengjing Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 14 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 4-14 years old; * Roman IV criteria for childhood constipation; * After a course of PEG and a course of Chinese medicine treatment was ineffective; * Barium enema showing fecal impaction.

Exclusion criteria

* Congenital and/or acquired intestinal diseases, such as congenital megacolon, intestinal stenosis, polyps, Crohn's disease, tuberculosis, inflammation, and tumors; * Anorectal diseases, such as anal atresia, fistula, abscess, and tumor; * Neurological diseases, such as brain and spinal cord diseases; * genetic metabolic diseases; * psychosocial and behavioral diseases; * other systemic diseases; * Refused to participate in.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
improvement of spontaneous bowel movements(SBMs) per weekBaselinethe frequency of defecation without drugs or other auxiliary methods
Satisfaction with bowel functionBaselineSatisfaction with bowel function was collected from the parents and defined as whether they were satisfied with bowel function after the treatment (yes or no).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Large diameter or scybalous stoolsBaselineappearance and wetness of stool
Bowel movementsBaselinethe frequency of bowel movements per week
EncopresisBaselinethe frequency of fecal incontinence
Excessive volitional stool retentionBaselineThe number of children who intentionally control or reduce the frequency of defecation
Painful or hard bowel movementsBaselineThe feelings of children during defecation

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026