Skip to content

Immunotherapy for Advanced Liver Cancer

Phase II/III Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study of AlloStim(R) vs Physician's Choice in Asian Subjects With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Status
Suspended
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05033522
Acronym
ALIVE
Enrollment
150
Registered
2021-09-02
Start date
2023-08-01
Completion date
2026-12-01
Last updated
2025-10-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Keywords

liver cancer, immunotherapy, Thailand, Malaysia

Brief summary

This is a randomized, controlled multi-site, multi-national clinical trial conducted in Thailand and Malaysia for Asian adults (males or females), 18 years of age and older presenting with advanced HCC (BCLC stage C) including subjects with macrovascular involvement and/or extrahepatic spread (not eligible for TACE, surgery or locoregional treatment) with Child-Pugh stage A or B liver function. 150 subjects will be randomized 2:1 to AlloStim® immunotherapy vs Physician's Choice of Sorafenib, Lenvatinib or FOLFOX4.

Detailed description

A multi-national, randomized, controlled trial (RCT) with multiple sites selected in Asia (Malaysia and Thailand). Subjects with no prior treatments for BCLC stage C disease and presenting with Child-Pugh class A or B liver reserve to be randomized 2:1 to AlloStim® vs. Physician's Choice (PC). PC to be declared prior to randomization. PC allowed to be either sorafenib, levantinib or FOLFOX4. The world incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is highest in East and South East Asia, with nearly half of the all HCC cases and deaths globally occurring in China. In Asian countries, the main treatment options for early or intermediate HCC (BCLC class A and B) include surgical resection, ablation (e.g., RFA, ETOH, cryoablation), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), radiation or systemic chemotherapy depending on liver function status. However, in the Asian-Pacific region it is estimated that up to 80% of patients present with unresectable, advanced HCC (BCLC Stage C) that are not eligible for locoregional therapy, surgery or TACE due to tumor size and/or vascular involvement. For these patients, the standard of care for over a decade has been sorafenib (Bayer, A.G.), a oral kinase inhibitor based on the results of a RCT (SHARP study) of 602 patients randomized to sorafenib vs. placebo. Median overall survival (OS) was 10.7 months for sorafenib and 7.9 months for placebo (p\<0.05). The SHARP study included a Western population. A separate study in Asian patients (226 patients from China, South Korea and Taiwan) comparing sorafenib to placebo (Sorafenib-AP study) demonstrated a OS of 6.5 months for sorafenib compared to 4.2 months for placebo (p\<0.05). The placebo OS difference between Asian and Western patients (4.2mo vs 7.9 mo) suggests a difference in the disease characteristics in the Asian population. One significant difference is that the Asian population has an increased prevalence of HBV compared to Western population which may contribute to the increased incidence of HCC and worse OS outcomes observed in Asian patients compared to Western patients. In Thailand and Malaysia sorafenib is not available to a majority of the population presenting with advanced HCC, both due to cost and toxicity profile. This study is designed to evaluate whether AlloStim ® immunotherapy will provide a survival benefit to this population with an improved quality of life compared to approved first line therapy.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALAlloStim® immunotherapy

3 cycles of intradermal and intravenous administrations

DRUGFOLFOX regimen

Comparative arm: Physician Choice of FOLFOX4 chemotherapy

DRUGSorafenib

Comparative arm: Physician Choice of Sorafenib

DRUGLenvatinib

Comparative Arm: Physician's Choice of Levantinib

Sponsors

Immunovative (Thailand) Co., Ltd
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Mirror Biologics, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The investigator and subjects will be informed of the treatment group to which the subject has been randomized.

Intervention model description

Subjects are randomized 2:1 to experimental vs physician's choice. A two-sided logrank test with an overall sample size of 130 subjects (43 in the control group and 87 in the treatment group) achieves 80% power to detect at a 0.05 significance level a hazard ratio of 0.56 when the control group median survival is 6.5 months. A total of 150 subjects are planned to be accrued.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Males and females who are at least 18 years of age at time of enrollment 2. Histologically or cytologically documented advanced HCC (BCLC stage C) disease at diagnosis. 3. No prior treatment for BCLC class C disease. 4. Child-Pugh Class A or subset of Child-Pugh Class B 5. Performance status: ECOG \< 2 with no deterioration over the previous 2 weeks 6. With or without positive HBV and/or HCV 7. With or without extrahepatic disease and with or without macrovascular invasion 8. Measurable enhancing disease in liver with at least one target lesion evaluable by mRECIST 9. Adequate hematological, liver and renal function as assessed by the following: * Hemoglobin \> 10.0 g/dl * Platelet count \> 75,000/μl * ALT and AST \< 5.0 x ULN * Serum creatinine \< 1.5 10. Women of child-bearing potential: negative pregnancy test 11. Patients of child producing potential: usage of contraception or avoidance of pregnancy measures while enrolled on study 12. Ability to understand the study, its inherent risks, side effects and potential benefits and ability to give written informed consent to participate

Exclusion criteria

1. Any prior cancer diagnosis (other than cured basal cell carcinoma, head and neck carcinoma in-situ, or superficial Ta, Tis, T1 bladder cancer) or concurrent cancer histologically different than HCC (e.g., cholangiocarcinoma). 2. Child-Pugh liver function combined score \>9 (Class C or Class D) 3. Moderate uncontrolled or severe ascites (+3 on Child-Pugh calculator) 4. Clinical symptoms of hepatic decompensation or presence of hepatic encephalopathy 5. Severe stomach/esophageal varices requiring interventional treatment. 6. Unable to tolerate radiological contrast dye 7. Any prior experimental, approved or off-label treatment for HCC (including levantinib, nivolumab, duvalumab, tremelimumab, brivananib, cabozantinib or ramucircumab) or any approved or experimental procedures such as surgery, radiation or ablation. 8. Enrollment in any previous clinical trial for HCC 9. Any history of autoimmune disorder (type I, insulin-dependent diabetes allowed) 10. History of COPD or oxygen saturation \<92% at room air 11. Any clinical condition requiring systemic steroids (inhaled steroids allowed) or any current immunosuppressive therapy or anti-epileptic drug therapy. 12. Known history of HIV infection 13. Clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 30 days prior to study entry 14. History of cardiac disease: congestive heart failure \> NYHA class 2; cardiac arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy (beta blockers or Digoxin are permitted) 15. Uncontrolled hypertension (SBP \>150 or DBP\>90). 16. Active clinically serious infections (\> grade 2 CTCAE version 5.0) 17. History of organ transplant or tissue allograft 18. Uncontrolled concurrent serious medical or psychiatric illness 19. Clinically apparent central nervous system metastases or carcinomatous meningitis 20. History of drug abuse or current alcohol abuse 21. History of blood transfusion reactions 22. Pregnant or lactating women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
overall survivalrom date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 48 monthsthe time from randomization till death

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life Surveyweekly assessments from baseline to 28 weeksusing European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary Questionnaire (FACT-Hep)
Time to Symptomatic Progressionrom date of randomization weekly for up to 24 weeks until the date of first documented progression which ever comes firstTo assess time to symptomatic progression (TTSP)

Countries

Malaysia, Thailand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026