Skip to content

Drug-Drug Interaction Study to Estimate the Effect of PF-07321332/Ritonavir and Ritonavir on Midazolam in Healthy Participants

COVID-19: A PHASE 1, OPEN-LABEL, 3-TREATMENT, 6-SEQUENCE, 3-PERIOD CROSSOVER STUDY TO ESTIMATE THE EFFECT OF PF-07321332/RITONAVIR AND RITONAVIR ON THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF MIDAZOLAM IN HEALTHY PARTICIPANTS.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05032950
Enrollment
12
Registered
2021-09-02
Start date
2021-09-17
Completion date
2021-12-09
Last updated
2023-10-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Participants

Keywords

Drug-drug interaction, Midazolam, COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019), SARS-CoV (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus)

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to estimate the effect PF-07321332/Ritonavir and Ritonavir on Midazolam (a cytochrome P450 \[CYP\]3A4 substrate) in Healthy Adult Participants.

Interventions

DRUGMidazolam

Midazolam administered as a single dose on Day 1

DRUGPF-07321332/ritonavir + Midazolam

PF-07321332/ritonavir: Administered orally every 12 hours for a total of 9 doses on Days 1-5 Midazolam: Administered orally as a single dose on Day 5

DRUGRitonavir + Midazolam

Ritonavir: Administered orally every 12 hours for a total of 9 doses on Day1-5. Midazolam: Administered orally as a single dose on Day 5

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This is a Phase I, crossover, 3-treatment, 6-sequence study to evaluate the effect of PF-07321332/ritonavir and ritonavir on the PK of midazolam in healthy participants. Midazolam is a substrate for CYP3A4. A total of approximately 12 healthy male and/or female participants will be enrolled into the study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Female participants of childbearing potential must have a negative (urine or serum) pregnancy test. 2. Body mass index (BMI) of 17.5 to 30.5 kg/m2; and a total body weight \>50 kg (110 lb). \-

Exclusion criteria

1. Positive test result for SARS-CoV-2 infection at the time of Screening or Day -1. 2. Evidence or history of clinically significant hematological, renal, endocrine, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, hepatic, psychiatric, neurological, or allergic disease (including drug allergies, but excluding untreated, asymptomatic, seasonal allergies at the time of dosing). 3. Clinically relevant abnormalities requiring treatment (eg, acute myocardial infarction, unstable ischemic conditions, evidence of ventricular dysfunction, serious tachy or brady arrhythmias) or indicating serious underlying heart disease (eg, prolonged PR interval, cardiomyopathy, heart failure greater than New York Heart Association (NYHA) 1, underlying structural heart disease, Wolff Parkinson-White syndrome). 4. Any condition possibly affecting drug absorption (eg, gastrectomy, cholecystectomy). 5. History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C; positive testing for HIV, HBsAg, or hepatitis C virus (HCVAb). Hepatitis B vaccination is allowed. 6. Other medical or psychiatric condition including recent (within the past year) or active suicidal ideation/behavior or laboratory abnormality or other conditions or situations related to COVID-19 pandemic (eg, Contact with positive case, residence, or travel to an area with high incidence) that may increase the risk of study participation or, in the investigator's judgment, make the participant inappropriate for the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With PF-07321332/RitonavirMidazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam+PF-07321332/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdoseCmax for midazolam following single dose administration with and without PF-07321332/ritonavir was observed directly from data. Natural log-transformed Cmax for Midazolam were analyzed using a mixed effect model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect. The ratios (PF-07321332/ritonavir + midazolam \[test\]/midazolam \[reference\] and 90% CIs) were expressed as percentages.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinity Time (AUCinf) of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With PF-07321332/RitonavirMidazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam+PF-07321332/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdoseAUCinf for midazolam following single dose administration with and without PF-07321332/ritonavir was calculated by AUClast + (Clast/kel), where Clast was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis. Natural log-transformed AUCinf for Midazolam were analyzed using a mixed effect model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect. The ratios (PF-07321332/ritonavir + midazolam \[test\]/midazolam \[reference\] and 90% CIs) were expressed as percentages.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (Clast) (AUClast) of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With PF-07321332/RitonavirMidazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam+PF-07321332/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdoseAUClast for midazolam following single dose administration with and without PF-07321332/ritonavir was calculated by Linear/Log trapezoidal method. Natural log-transformed AUClast for Midazolam were analyzed using a mixed effect model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect. The ratios (PF-07321332/ritonavir + midazolam \[test\]/midazolam \[reference\] and 90% CIs) were expressed as percentages.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesBaseline up to Day 28Baseline and changes from baseline in PR, QT, QRS, heart rate and QTcF were summarized by treatment and time postdose. Baseline was defined as the average of the triplicate predose recordings in each study period. ECG endpoints and changes from baseline (QTcF, PR, QRS), over all measurements taken postdose, were also summarized descriptively by treatment using categories as defined in the Criteria for Safety Values of Potential Clinical Concern appendix of the protocol and for QTc values corresponding to ICH E14 thresholds, which are: QTcF (msec): 450\<value≤480; 480\<value≤500; \>500; QTcF (msec) increase from baseline: 30\<change≤60; change\>60
Cmax of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With RitonavirMidazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdoseCmax for midazolam following single dose administration with and without ritonavir was observed directly form data. Natural log-transformed Cmax for Midazolam were analyzed using a mixed effect model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect. The ratios (ritonavir + midazolam \[test\]/midazolam \[reference\] and 90% CIs) were expressed as percentages.
AUCinf of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With RitonavirMidazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdoseAUCinf for midazolam following single dose administration with and without ritonavir was calculated by AUClast + (Clast/kel), where Clast was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis. Natural log-transformed AUCinf for Midazolam were analyzed using a mixed effect model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect. The ratios (ritonavir + midazolam \[test\]/midazolam \[reference\] and 90% CIs) were expressed as percentages.
AUClast of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With RitonavirMidazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam/ritonavir: Day 5 pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-doseAUClast for midazolam following single dose administration with and without ritonavir was calculated by Linear/Log trapezoidal method. Natural log-transformed AUClast for Midazolam were analyzed using a mixed effect model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect. The ratios (ritonavir + midazolam \[test\]/midazolam \[reference\] and 90% CIs) were expressed as percentages.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Baseline up to Day 28An adverse event was considered a TEAE if the event started during the effective duration of treatment. All events that start on or after the first dosing day and time/ start time, if collected, but before the last dose plus the lag time (28 days) were flagged as TEAEs. The algorithm did consider any events that started prior to the first dose date. Any events occurring following start of treatment or increasing in severity were counted as treatment emergent. Events that occur in a non-treatment period (for example, Washout or Follow-up) were counted as treatment emergent and attributed to the previous treatment taken.
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With RitonavirMidazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam+PF-07321332/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdoseVz/F for midazolam following single dose administration with and without PF-07321332/ritonavir or ritonavir was calculated by Dose/(AUCinf • kel).
Time for Cmax (Tmax) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With RitonavirMidazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam+PF-07321332/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdoseTmax for midazolam following single dose administration with and without PF-07321332/ritonavir or ritonavir was calculated by observed directly from data as time of first occurrence.
Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With RitonavirMidazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam+PF-07321332/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdoset½ for midazolam following single dose administration with and without PF-07321332/ritonavir or ritonavir was calculated by Loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve. Only those data points judged to describe the terminal log-linear.
Apparent Clearance (CL/F) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With RitonavirMidazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam+PF-07321332/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdoseCL/F for midazolam following single dose administration with and without PF-07321332/ritonavir or ritonavir was calculated by Dose/AUCinf.
Number of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesBaseline up to Day 28The haematological, clinical chemistry (serum) and urinalysis safety tests were assessed against the criteria specified in the sponsor reporting standards to determine if there were any clinically significant laboratory abnormalities. The assessment took into account whether each participant's baseline test result was within or outside the laboratory reference range for the particular laboratory parameter. Baseline was defined as the last planned predose measurement taken in each study period.
Number of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesBaseline up to Day 28Baseline was the last predose recording in each study period. Only post baseline values are included in this analysis

Countries

Belgium

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 12 healthy participants were randomized to receive midazolam, PF-07321332/ritonavir + midazolam, and ritonavir + midazolam in a total of 6 sequences.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
All participants enrolled in this study
12
Total12

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyAdverse Event001100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Continuous
Mean (SD)
34.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.26
Age, Customized
18-25 Years
2 Participants
Age, Customized
<18 Years
0 Participants
Age, Customized
26-35 Years
4 Participants
Age, Customized
36-45 Years
4 Participants
Age, Customized
>45 Years
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 110 / 11
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 109 / 117 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 110 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinity Time (AUCinf) of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With PF-07321332/Ritonavir

AUCinf for midazolam following single dose administration with and without PF-07321332/ritonavir was calculated by AUClast + (Clast/kel), where Clast was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis. Natural log-transformed AUCinf for Midazolam were analyzed using a mixed effect model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect. The ratios (PF-07321332/ritonavir + midazolam \[test\]/midazolam \[reference\] and 90% CIs) were expressed as percentages.

Time frame: Midazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam+PF-07321332/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdose

Population: The PK parameter analysis population was defined as all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Midazolam 2 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinity Time (AUCinf) of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With PF-07321332/Ritonavir26.13 ng*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 45
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinity Time (AUCinf) of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With PF-07321332/Ritonavir363.9 ng*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13
Comparison: Natural log-transformed AUCinf of midazolam was analyzed using mixed effect model with treatment, period and sequence as fixed effects and participant in sequence as random effect. Estimates of the adjusted mean differences (AMD) (Test-Reference) and 90%CIs were obtained from the model. The AMD and 90%CIs for the differences were exponentiated to provide estimates of the ratio of adjusted geometric means (Test/Reference) and 90%CI for the ratios.90% CI: [1204.54, 1697.71]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (Clast) (AUClast) of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With PF-07321332/Ritonavir

AUClast for midazolam following single dose administration with and without PF-07321332/ritonavir was calculated by Linear/Log trapezoidal method. Natural log-transformed AUClast for Midazolam were analyzed using a mixed effect model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect. The ratios (PF-07321332/ritonavir + midazolam \[test\]/midazolam \[reference\] and 90% CIs) were expressed as percentages.

Time frame: Midazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam+PF-07321332/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdose

Population: The PK parameter analysis population was defined as all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Midazolam 2 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (Clast) (AUClast) of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With PF-07321332/Ritonavir25.02 ng*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 44
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (Clast) (AUClast) of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With PF-07321332/Ritonavir353.8 ng*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13
Comparison: Natural log-transformed AUClast of midazolam was analyzed using mixed effect model with treatment, period and sequence as fixed effects and participant in sequence as random effect. Estimates of the adjusted mean differences (AMD) (Test-Reference) and 90%CIs were obtained from the model. The AMD and 90%CIs for the differences were exponentiated to provide estimates of the ratio of adjusted geometric means (Test/Reference) and 90%CI for the ratios.90% CI: [1224.42, 1721.35]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With PF-07321332/Ritonavir

Cmax for midazolam following single dose administration with and without PF-07321332/ritonavir was observed directly from data. Natural log-transformed Cmax for Midazolam were analyzed using a mixed effect model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect. The ratios (PF-07321332/ritonavir + midazolam \[test\]/midazolam \[reference\] and 90% CIs) were expressed as percentages.

Time frame: Midazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam+PF-07321332/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdose

Population: The PK parameter analysis population was defined as all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Midazolam 2 mgMaximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With PF-07321332/Ritonavir9.812 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 38
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgMaximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With PF-07321332/Ritonavir36.18 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17
Comparison: Natural log-transformed Cmax of midazolam was analyzed using mixed effect model with treatment, period and sequence as fixed effects and participant in sequence as random effect. Estimates of the adjusted mean differences (AMD) (Test-Reference) and 90%CIs were obtained from the model. The AMD and 90%CIs for the differences were exponentiated to provide estimates of the ratio of adjusted geometric means (Test/Reference) and 90%CI for the ratios.90% CI: [318.91, 425.41]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Apparent Clearance (CL/F) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With Ritonavir

CL/F for midazolam following single dose administration with and without PF-07321332/ritonavir or ritonavir was calculated by Dose/AUCinf.

Time frame: Midazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam+PF-07321332/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdose

Population: The PK parameter analysis population was defined as all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Midazolam 2 mgApparent Clearance (CL/F) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With Ritonavir76.57 Litre/hourGeometric Coefficient of Variation 45
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgApparent Clearance (CL/F) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With Ritonavir5.500 Litre/hourGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgApparent Clearance (CL/F) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With Ritonavir4.776 Litre/hourGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15
Secondary

Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With Ritonavir

Vz/F for midazolam following single dose administration with and without PF-07321332/ritonavir or ritonavir was calculated by Dose/(AUCinf • kel).

Time frame: Midazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam+PF-07321332/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdose

Population: The PK parameter analysis population was defined as all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Midazolam 2 mgApparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With Ritonavir488.6 LitreGeometric Coefficient of Variation 48
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgApparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With Ritonavir79.84 LitreGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgApparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With Ritonavir76.43 LitreGeometric Coefficient of Variation 31
Secondary

AUCinf of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With Ritonavir

AUCinf for midazolam following single dose administration with and without ritonavir was calculated by AUClast + (Clast/kel), where Clast was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis. Natural log-transformed AUCinf for Midazolam were analyzed using a mixed effect model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect. The ratios (ritonavir + midazolam \[test\]/midazolam \[reference\] and 90% CIs) were expressed as percentages.

Time frame: Midazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdose

Population: The PK parameter analysis population was defined as all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Midazolam 2 mgAUCinf of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With Ritonavir26.13 ng*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 45
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgAUCinf of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With Ritonavir418.6 ng*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15
Comparison: Natural log-transformed AUCinf of midazolam was analyzed using mixed effect model with treatment, period and sequence as fixed effects and participant in sequence as random effect. Estimates of the adjusted mean differences (AMD)(Test-Reference) and 90%CIs were obtained from the model. The AMD and 90%CIs for the differences were exponentiated to provide estimates of the ratio of adjusted geometric means (Test/Reference) and 90%CI for the ratios90% CI: [1385.75, 1953.11]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

AUClast of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With Ritonavir

AUClast for midazolam following single dose administration with and without ritonavir was calculated by Linear/Log trapezoidal method. Natural log-transformed AUClast for Midazolam were analyzed using a mixed effect model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect. The ratios (ritonavir + midazolam \[test\]/midazolam \[reference\] and 90% CIs) were expressed as percentages.

Time frame: Midazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam/ritonavir: Day 5 pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

Population: The PK parameter analysis population was defined as all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Midazolam 2 mgAUClast of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With Ritonavir25.02 ng*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 44
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgAUClast of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With Ritonavir408.8 ng*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15
Comparison: Natural log-transformed AUClast of midazolam was analyzed using mixed effect model with treatment, period and sequence as fixed effects and participant in sequence as random effect. Estimates of the adjusted mean differences (AMD)(Test-Reference) and 90%CIs were obtained from the model. The AMD and 90%CIs for the differences were exponentiated to provide estimates of the ratio of adjusted geometric means (Test/Reference) and 90%CI for the ratios.90% CI: [1414.59, 1988.69]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Cmax of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With Ritonavir

Cmax for midazolam following single dose administration with and without ritonavir was observed directly form data. Natural log-transformed Cmax for Midazolam were analyzed using a mixed effect model with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect. The ratios (ritonavir + midazolam \[test\]/midazolam \[reference\] and 90% CIs) were expressed as percentages.

Time frame: Midazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdose

Population: The PK parameter analysis population was defined as all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Midazolam 2 mgCmax of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With Ritonavir9.812 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 38
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgCmax of Midazolam When Administered Alone and With Ritonavir38.03 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18
Comparison: Natural log-transformed Cmax of midazolam was analyzed using mixed effect model with treatment, period and sequence as fixed effects and participant in sequence as random effect. Estimates of the adjusted mean differences (AMD)(Test-Reference) and 90%CIs were obtained from the model. The AMD and 90%CIs for the differences were exponentiated to provide estimates of the ratio of adjusted geometric means (Test/Reference) and 90%CI for the ratios.90% CI: [335.25, 447.21]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities

Baseline and changes from baseline in PR, QT, QRS, heart rate and QTcF were summarized by treatment and time postdose. Baseline was defined as the average of the triplicate predose recordings in each study period. ECG endpoints and changes from baseline (QTcF, PR, QRS), over all measurements taken postdose, were also summarized descriptively by treatment using categories as defined in the Criteria for Safety Values of Potential Clinical Concern appendix of the protocol and for QTc values corresponding to ICH E14 thresholds, which are: QTcF (msec): 450\<value≤480; 480\<value≤500; \>500; QTcF (msec) increase from baseline: 30\<change≤60; change\>60

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28

Population: All participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the study intervention they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQRS DURATION, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - %Change≥50%0 Participants
Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTCF INTERVAL, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - Change>600 Participants
Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTCF INTERVAL, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - 480<Value≤5000 Participants
Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTCF INTERVAL, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - 450<Value≤4800 Participants
Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesPR INTERVAL, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - Value≥3000 Participants
Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTCF INTERVAL, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - 30<Change≤600 Participants
Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQRS DURATION, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - Value≥1400 Participants
Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesPR INTERVAL, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - %Change≥25/50%0 Participants
Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTCF INTERVAL, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - Value>5000 Participants
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTCF INTERVAL, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - 450<Value≤4800 Participants
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesPR INTERVAL, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - Value≥3000 Participants
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesPR INTERVAL, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - %Change≥25/50%0 Participants
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQRS DURATION, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - Value≥1400 Participants
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQRS DURATION, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - %Change≥50%0 Participants
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTCF INTERVAL, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - 480<Value≤5000 Participants
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTCF INTERVAL, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - Value>5000 Participants
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTCF INTERVAL, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - 30<Change≤600 Participants
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTCF INTERVAL, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - Change>600 Participants
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQRS DURATION, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - Value≥1400 Participants
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesPR INTERVAL, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - Value≥3000 Participants
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTCF INTERVAL, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - Value>5000 Participants
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesPR INTERVAL, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - %Change≥25/50%0 Participants
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTCF INTERVAL, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - Change>600 Participants
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTCF INTERVAL, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - 450<Value≤4800 Participants
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQRS DURATION, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - %Change≥50%0 Participants
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTCF INTERVAL, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - 30<Change≤600 Participants
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTCF INTERVAL, AGGREGATE (MSEC) - 480<Value≤5000 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities

The haematological, clinical chemistry (serum) and urinalysis safety tests were assessed against the criteria specified in the sponsor reporting standards to determine if there were any clinically significant laboratory abnormalities. The assessment took into account whether each participant's baseline test result was within or outside the laboratory reference range for the particular laboratory parameter. Baseline was defined as the last planned predose measurement taken in each study period.

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28

Population: All participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the study intervention they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesURINALYSIS - URINE Hemoglobin (Scalar) ≥12 Participants
Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesHEMATOLOGY - Lymphocytes/Leukocytes (%) >1.2x ULN0 Participants
Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesHEMATOLOGY - Neutrophils (10^3/mm^3) <0.8x LLN0 Participants
Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesHEMATOLOGY - Neutrophils/Leukocytes (%) <0.8x LLN0 Participants
Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesHEMATOLOGY - Eosinophils/Leukocytes (%) >1.2x ULN0 Participants
Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesHEMATOLOGY - Monocytes/Leukocytes (%) >1.2x ULN1 Participants
Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesHEMATOLOGY - Prothrombin Time (sec) >1.1x ULN0 Participants
Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesCLINICAL CHEMISTRY - Thyrotropin (uIU/mL) <0.8x LLN1 Participants
Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesCLINICAL CHEMISTRY - Fibrinogen (mg/dL) >1.25x Baseline1 Participants
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesHEMATOLOGY - Monocytes/Leukocytes (%) >1.2x ULN1 Participants
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesURINALYSIS - URINE Hemoglobin (Scalar) ≥11 Participants
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesHEMATOLOGY - Lymphocytes/Leukocytes (%) >1.2x ULN0 Participants
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesHEMATOLOGY - Eosinophils/Leukocytes (%) >1.2x ULN1 Participants
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesCLINICAL CHEMISTRY - Thyrotropin (uIU/mL) <0.8x LLN1 Participants
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesHEMATOLOGY - Neutrophils (10^3/mm^3) <0.8x LLN0 Participants
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesCLINICAL CHEMISTRY - Fibrinogen (mg/dL) >1.25x Baseline1 Participants
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesHEMATOLOGY - Prothrombin Time (sec) >1.1x ULN0 Participants
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesHEMATOLOGY - Neutrophils/Leukocytes (%) <0.8x LLN1 Participants
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesHEMATOLOGY - Prothrombin Time (sec) >1.1x ULN1 Participants
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesURINALYSIS - URINE Hemoglobin (Scalar) ≥13 Participants
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesHEMATOLOGY - Eosinophils/Leukocytes (%) >1.2x ULN1 Participants
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesHEMATOLOGY - Monocytes/Leukocytes (%) >1.2x ULN2 Participants
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesCLINICAL CHEMISTRY - Fibrinogen (mg/dL) >1.25x Baseline0 Participants
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesHEMATOLOGY - Neutrophils/Leukocytes (%) <0.8x LLN1 Participants
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesHEMATOLOGY - Lymphocytes/Leukocytes (%) >1.2x ULN1 Participants
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesHEMATOLOGY - Neutrophils (10^3/mm^3) <0.8x LLN1 Participants
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesCLINICAL CHEMISTRY - Thyrotropin (uIU/mL) <0.8x LLN1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event was considered a TEAE if the event started during the effective duration of treatment. All events that start on or after the first dosing day and time/ start time, if collected, but before the last dose plus the lag time (28 days) were flagged as TEAEs. The algorithm did consider any events that started prior to the first dose date. Any events occurring following start of treatment or increasing in severity were counted as treatment emergent. Events that occur in a non-treatment period (for example, Washout or Follow-up) were counted as treatment emergent and attributed to the previous treatment taken.

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28

Population: All participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who take at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the study intervention they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with adverse events (All Causalities)4 Participants
Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with adverse events (Treatment related)4 Participants
Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with serious adverse events0 Participants
Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with severe adverse events0 Participants
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with severe adverse events0 Participants
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with adverse events (All Causalities)9 Participants
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with serious adverse events0 Participants
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with adverse events (Treatment related)9 Participants
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with severe adverse events0 Participants
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with adverse events (Treatment related)7 Participants
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with serious adverse events0 Participants
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with adverse events (All Causalities)7 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities

Baseline was the last predose recording in each study period. Only post baseline values are included in this analysis

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28

Population: All participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the study intervention they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities0 Participants
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities1 Participants
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities0 Participants
Secondary

Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With Ritonavir

t½ for midazolam following single dose administration with and without PF-07321332/ritonavir or ritonavir was calculated by Loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve. Only those data points judged to describe the terminal log-linear.

Time frame: Midazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam+PF-07321332/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdose

Population: The PK parameter analysis population was defined as all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Midazolam 2 mgTerminal Half-life (t1/2) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With Ritonavir4.988 HourStandard Deviation 2.2058
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgTerminal Half-life (t1/2) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With Ritonavir10.47 HourStandard Deviation 2.9096
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgTerminal Half-life (t1/2) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With Ritonavir11.54 HourStandard Deviation 3.4741
Secondary

Time for Cmax (Tmax) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With Ritonavir

Tmax for midazolam following single dose administration with and without PF-07321332/ritonavir or ritonavir was calculated by observed directly from data as time of first occurrence.

Time frame: Midazolam: Day 1 Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 hours postdose; Midazolam+PF-07321332/ritonavir: Day 5 predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours postdose

Population: The PK parameter analysis population was defined as all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Midazolam 2 mgTime for Cmax (Tmax) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With Ritonavir1.00 Hour
PF-07321332 300 mg/Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgTime for Cmax (Tmax) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With Ritonavir1.00 Hour
Ritonavir 100 mg + Midazolam 2 mgTime for Cmax (Tmax) of Midazolam When Administered Alone, With PF-07321332/Ritonavir, and With Ritonavir1.02 Hour

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 1, 2026