Skip to content

Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Versus Conventional Epidural Techmique

Comparative Study Between Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Versus Conventional Epidural Technique During Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05032677
Enrollment
50
Registered
2021-09-02
Start date
2021-08-18
Completion date
2022-12-10
Last updated
2022-12-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gynecologic Disease Requiring Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Under Neuraxial Anesthesia

Brief summary

This study will be conducted on 50 patients of ASA grade I and II aged from 25 to 55 years and presented for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Patients will be divided into two equal groups; group A control group for conventional epidural technique(n=25) and group B for 25G dural puncture epidural with 25G pencil point Whitacre spinal needle (n=25). Randomization will be done using computer generated number and concealed using sequentially numbered, sealed opaque envelope.

Interventions

Standard Lumbar Epidural Block using Touhy Epidural Needle (18G) at L2-3 inter-space and Epidural Catheter (20G) was inserted then bupivacaine 0.5% 15-20 ml with 50ug fentanyl was given.

25G Dural Puncture Epidural Block at L2-3 inter-space then bupivacaine 0.5% 15-20 ml with 50ug fentanyl was given.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
25 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* ASA I and II * Height(150-170 cm)

Exclusion criteria

* patient refusal * hypersensitivity to local anesthetic drugs * bleeding disorders and coagulopathy(platelets count less than 80000,INR less than 1.5 or therapeutic dose of anticoagulant).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
incidence of bilateral sacral blockadeUp to 30 minutes after local anesthetic injectionSensory blockade was evaluated using a non-traumatic pinprick stimulus starting at the S2 dermatome and moving in a caudad direction (measured every 2 minutes)

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026