Skip to content

Acute and Long Term Effects of VNS on Memory in Patients With Refractory Epilepsy

Research on the Acute and Long Term Effects on Memory and the Mechanism of Action of Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Refractory Epilepsy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05031208
Enrollment
16
Registered
2021-09-01
Start date
2018-11-22
Completion date
2020-08-28
Last updated
2023-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Refractory Epilepsy

Keywords

Vagus nerve stimulation, Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation, Word recognition paradigm

Brief summary

Refractory epilepsy patients implanted with a vagus nerve stimulator perform a memory test at baseline in three conditions: invasive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) and sham stimulation. After 6 weeks of VNS treatment, the memory test is repeated in two condition: invasive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and sham stimulation. The endpoint of this experiment is assessing the effect of VNS and taVNS on memory performance.

Detailed description

Previous studies underlined the potential of both invasive as transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation to ameliorate certain cognitive functions. In this randomized, controlled cross-over within-subjects study, a memory test is conducted in patients with refractory epilepsy who are implanted with a vagus nerve stimulation. The memory test consists out of a word recognition paradigm based on the study of Clarck et al. published in 1999 in Nature Neuroscience. Testing is performed at baseline (before start of the stimulation) and after 6 weeks of treatment with vagus nerve stimulation. During the first session, the patients complete the word recognition task during three interventions: * Invasive vagus nerve stimulation * Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (cymba concha) * Sham vagus nerve stimulation (no stimulation) During the second session, the patients complete the word recognition task during two interventions: * Invasive vagus nerve stimulation * Sham vagus nerve stimulation (no stimulation) The goal is to investigate if invasive vagus nerve stimulation and transcutaneous nerve stimulation can influence (i.e. improve) the performance on the memory task and if this performance is improved after 6 weeks of VNS treatment.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTMemory task

Word recognition task

Sponsors

University Hospital, Ghent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Refractory epilepsy * Treated with vagus nerve stimulation * IQ \>= 70 and able to perform the memory task

Exclusion criteria

* IQ \< 70

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Immediate recall score at session 1At baselineFree recall score for correctly recalled words (min score 0,max score 21, higher score indicates better performance), calculated as a percentage
Immediate recall score at session 2After 6 weeks of VNS treatmentFree recall score for correctly recalled words (min score 0, max score 21, higher score indicates better performance)), calculated as a percentage
Delayed recognition scores at session 1At baselineHitscore for correctly recognized target words (min score 0,max score 63, higher score indicates better performance), score for not recognized target words= misses (min score 0,max score 63, higher score indicates worse performance),correct rejection score of non-target related words (min score 0,max score 63, higher score indicates better performance), score for incorrect recognition of non-target related words= false alarms (min score 0,max score 63, higher score indicates worse performance), discrimination index= hit score -false alarm score (min score 0,max score 63, higher score indicates better performance). All scores are calculated as a percentage.
Delayed recognition scores at session 2After 6 weeks of VNS treatmentHitscore for correctly recognized target words (min score 0,max score 48, higher score indicates better performance), score for not recognized target words= misses (min score 0,max score 48, higher score indicates worse performance),correct rejection score of non-target related words (min score 0,max score 48, higher score indicates better performance), score for incorrect recognition of non-target related words= false alarms (min score 0,max score 48, higher score indicates worse performance), discrimination index= hit score -false alarm score (min score 0,max score 48, higher score indicates better performance). All scores are calculated as a percentage.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Attention score at session 1At baselineScore of correct responses on 6 open question (min score 0, max score 6, higher score indicates better performance), calculated as a percentage
Attention score at session 2After 6 weeks of VNS treatmentScore of correct responses on 6 open question (min score 0, max score 6, higher score indicates better performance), calculated as a percentage

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026