Skip to content

Maintaining Optimal HVNI Delivery Using Automatic Titration of Oxygen in Preterm Infants

Maintaining Optimal Delivery Using Automatic Titration of Oxygen in Preterm Infants Receiving High Velocity Nasal Insufflation Therapy

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05030012
Acronym
MODERATION Neo
Enrollment
15
Registered
2021-09-01
Start date
2021-09-02
Completion date
2023-10-19
Last updated
2024-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, Infant, Premature, Neonatal Respiratory Distress, Oxygen Saturation

Keywords

High Velocity Nasal Insufflation (HVNI), Preterm Infants, Noninvasive Ventilatory Support, Automatic Oxygen Titration, Closed Loop Oxygen Control, High Flow Nasal Cannula

Brief summary

Oxygen treatment is common in management of preterm babies requiring intensive care. Delivery of too much or too little oxygen increase the risk of damage to eyes and lungs, and contributes to death and disability. Oxygen control in preterm infants requires frequent adjustments in the amount of oxygen delivered to the baby. This is generally performed manually by a clinician attending the baby, and generally directed to maintaining a specific range of blood oxygen saturation. The manual control often results in only half of the time in the specified range, with the baby experiencing high and low blood oxygen saturations. The technology being studied is designed to assist the clinician in maintaining blood oxygen saturation within target range by measuring oxygen saturation and automatically adjusting the amount of oxygen delivered for babies receiving high velocity nasal insufflation (an advanced form of high flow oxygen therapy). The proposed study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of the automatic control of oxygen by the new technology, as compared to manual control, among babies receiving high velocity therapy in a neonatal intensive care unit.

Detailed description

Detailed Description: Supplemental oxygen is commonly administered to babies in neonatal intensive care units. The goal of oxygen therapy is to maintain normal oxygenation while minimizing hypoxemia and hypoxemia. Preterm infants are particularly vulnerable to oxygen toxicity and oxidative stress leading to retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), and periventricular leukomalacia (PVL). It's also well known that preterm infants experience hypoxic events exposing the baby to low oxygen levels. These hypoxic events vary as the infant matures, but exposure to prolonged and frequent episodes of hypoxemia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The delivery of oxygen is generally controlled by a clinician, and the control decisions are generally made using a non-invasive measure of blood oxygen saturation called pulse oximetry (SpO2) and is a standard of care in the neonatal intensive care unit. The most frequent item adjusted by clinicians to maintain SpO2 within specific target ranges is the fraction of the inspired oxygen (FiO2). In a recent study by Reynolds, et al., caregiver manual control of oxygen delivered to NICU babies receiving high velocity therapy resulted in only 49% of the total 24-hour study period with the babies within the target SpO2 range (90-95%). by the caregiver based on the monitored oxygen saturation. Similar to the Reynolds findings, Hagadorn et al., conducted a study in 14 centers and showed that preterm infants under 28 weeks' gestation receiving oxygen spent on average only 48% of the time with SpO2 within the prescribed target range, about 36% of the time above and 16% of the time with SpO2 below the target range. Preterm infants have frequent fluctuations in SpO2 due to their cardio-respiratory instability requiring frequent adjustments of FiO2 . Consequently, these particularly vulnerable infants spend significant time with SpO2 outside the optimal target range and are often exposed to extremes of hypoxemia and hyperoxaemia. The automatic oxygen control system continuously monitors the oxygen saturation and adjusts the oxygen delivery to maintain oxygen saturation within the target range. The efficacy of this mode of oxygen control was demonstrated by Reynolds, et al. in 2018 from two centers in the United Kingdom. Automated control of FiO2 can significantly improve compliance of oxygen saturation targeting and may significantly reduces exposure to hypoxemia as well as hyperoxaemia. The high velocity nasal insufflation therapy is a common mode of non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants. Unlike prior studies, this study will include a set of hypothesis-driven safety endpoints (proportion of time above or below target range), stratification by body mass at enrolment, and skin pigmentation phenotype. The objective of this randomized control trial is to evaluate the efficacy of the controller (Vapotherm Oxygen Assist Module \[OAM\]) in maintaining the SpO2 within target range for premature infants receiving high velocity therapy and presenting with a labile FiO2 requirement.

Interventions

DEVICEAutomated Control

The purpose of this intervention is to evaluate that the efficacy and safety during the automated performance of the Vapotherm OAM are not inferior to standard care practice (manual control) in maintaining SpO2 levels of 90-95% in preterm infants requiring oxygen adjustments while being treated with high velocity nasal insufflation (HVNI) therapy.

The purpose of this intervention is to establish an active comparator via standard care practice against which to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the automated arm of the study, for determination of non-inferiority of that automated control arm to manual control in maintaining SpO2 levels of 90-95% in preterm infants being treated with high velocity nasal insufflation (HVNI) therapy.

Sponsors

Children's National Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Seattle Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Utah
CollaboratorOTHER
Vapotherm, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

This study is unblinded, as there is a distinct difference in modality control between automated and manual modes. Clinical staff are instructed to perform FiO2 adjustments as required, regardless of the study arm.

Intervention model description

This study will be a prospective, multi-center, randomized, crossover trial evaluating automated oxygen titration versus manual titration in maintaining oxygen saturation levels in preterm infants requiring noninvasive ventilatory support via high velocity nasal insufflation (HVNI).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Infants delivered at a gestational age of less than or equal to 35 6/7 weeks (Preterm) being treated with high velocity nasal insufflation therapy for the management of respiratory distress syndrome 2. Patients that clinically require SpO2 maintenance within the target range of 90-95% 3. A need for supplemental oxygen as demonstrated by a required FiO2 \> 0.25 at enrollment 4. Requiring a flow rate of greater than 2 L•min-1 such that the assumed inspired oxygen fraction matched delivered oxygen fraction (definition of HVNI). 5. A minimum of 6 manual FiO2 adjustments in the 24hr period prior to trial enrollment. 6. Willing/Able to complete informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Current patient weight of \<1000g or \>3500g at time of study 2. Major congenital abnormalities 3. Hemodynamic instability, defined as being outside of a normotensive range based on an infant's individual characteristics by clinician 4. Persistent unresolved apnea defined as: requiring 6 stimulations or more per 6 hours 5. Seizures 6. Ongoing sepsis 7. Meningitis 8. Clinician's concern regarding stability of the infant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Safety Objective - Percentage of Time Outside of SpO2 Target RangeThrough study completion, two consecutive 24-hour periodsPercentage of time spent outside target oxygen saturation range, measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2). A lower value indicates a better outcome.
Primary Performance Objective - Percentage of Time Within SpO2 Target RangeThrough study completion, two consecutive 24-hour periodsPercentage of time spent within target oxygen saturation range, measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2). A higher value indicates a better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Performance Endpoint, Percentage of Time IN Range (SpO2 in 90-95% With FiO2 Special at .21) Across the Two Weight Groups.Through study completion, two consecutive 24-hour periodsPercentage of time spent within target oxygen saturation range across two weight groups (1000g-2500g, 2501g-3500g), measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2). A higher value indicates a better outcome.
Secondary Performance Objective 2 - Percentage of Time Within SpO2 Target Range (Skin Pigmentation)Through study completion, two consecutive 24-hour periodsPercentage of time spent within target oxygen saturation range across two skin pigmentation groups (light, dark), measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2). A higher value indicates a better outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Automated Control (OAM) Then Manual Control
The subjects will start the study on the Automated Control (OAM) for a total of 24 hours. Then, the subjects will switch to the Manual Control Arm for 24 hours, for a total of 48 hours.
6
Manual Control (Manual) Then Automated Control (OAM)
The subjects will start the study on the Manual Control Arm for a total of 24 hours. Then, the subjects will switch to the Automated Control (OAM) Arm for 24 hours, for a total of 48 hours.
9
Total15

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicManual Control (Manual) Then Automated Control (OAM)TotalAutomated Control (OAM) Then Manual Control
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
9 Participants15 Participants6 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous29.7 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
28.8 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
27.5 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants11 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
9 participants15 participants6 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants10 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants5 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 150 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Primary Performance Objective - Percentage of Time Within SpO2 Target Range

Percentage of time spent within target oxygen saturation range, measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2). A higher value indicates a better outcome.

Time frame: Through study completion, two consecutive 24-hour periods

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Automated Control (OAM)Primary Performance Objective - Percentage of Time Within SpO2 Target Range73.6 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 10.7
Manual Control (Manual)Primary Performance Objective - Percentage of Time Within SpO2 Target Range53.2 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 11.8
Primary

Primary Safety Objective - Percentage of Time Outside of SpO2 Target Range

Percentage of time spent outside target oxygen saturation range, measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2). A lower value indicates a better outcome.

Time frame: Through study completion, two consecutive 24-hour periods

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Automated Control (OAM)Primary Safety Objective - Percentage of Time Outside of SpO2 Target Range24.6 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 10.7
Manual Control (Manual)Primary Safety Objective - Percentage of Time Outside of SpO2 Target Range45.1 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 11.4
Secondary

Performance Endpoint, Percentage of Time IN Range (SpO2 in 90-95% With FiO2 Special at .21) Across the Two Weight Groups.

Percentage of time spent within target oxygen saturation range across two weight groups (1000g-2500g, 2501g-3500g), measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2). A higher value indicates a better outcome.

Time frame: Through study completion, two consecutive 24-hour periods

Population: There are two weight categories, 14 were in the lower weight and 1 subject was in the higher weight.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Automated Control (OAM)Performance Endpoint, Percentage of Time IN Range (SpO2 in 90-95% With FiO2 Special at .21) Across the Two Weight Groups.Lower Weight (1000g-2500g)52.2 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 11.6
Automated Control (OAM)Performance Endpoint, Percentage of Time IN Range (SpO2 in 90-95% With FiO2 Special at .21) Across the Two Weight Groups.Higher Weight (2501g - 3500g)67.4 percentage of time
Manual Control (Manual)Performance Endpoint, Percentage of Time IN Range (SpO2 in 90-95% With FiO2 Special at .21) Across the Two Weight Groups.Lower Weight (1000g-2500g)73.0 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 10.9
Manual Control (Manual)Performance Endpoint, Percentage of Time IN Range (SpO2 in 90-95% With FiO2 Special at .21) Across the Two Weight Groups.Higher Weight (2501g - 3500g)81.3 percentage of time
Secondary

Secondary Performance Objective 2 - Percentage of Time Within SpO2 Target Range (Skin Pigmentation)

Percentage of time spent within target oxygen saturation range across two skin pigmentation groups (light, dark), measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2). A higher value indicates a better outcome.

Time frame: Through study completion, two consecutive 24-hour periods

Population: There are two skin pigment groups, dark and light. For the manual arm, there were two subjects in the dark and 13 in the light.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Automated Control (OAM)Secondary Performance Objective 2 - Percentage of Time Within SpO2 Target Range (Skin Pigmentation)Dark Skin41.2 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 13.8
Automated Control (OAM)Secondary Performance Objective 2 - Percentage of Time Within SpO2 Target Range (Skin Pigmentation)Light Skin55.0 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 10.9
Manual Control (Manual)Secondary Performance Objective 2 - Percentage of Time Within SpO2 Target Range (Skin Pigmentation)Dark Skin75.7 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 19.6
Manual Control (Manual)Secondary Performance Objective 2 - Percentage of Time Within SpO2 Target Range (Skin Pigmentation)Light Skin73.3 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 10.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026