Skip to content

Regional Anesthesia in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery

Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial of Erector Spinae Plane Blocks (ESPB) for Perioperative Pain Management for Minimally Invasive (MIS) Lumbar Spine Surgery

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05029726
Enrollment
125
Registered
2021-08-31
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
2027-04-30
Last updated
2026-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Degenerative Disc Disease, Degenerative Intervertebral Discs, Degenerative Spondylolisthesis, Lumbar Disc Herniation, Lumbar Radiculopathy, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Lumbar Spine Instability, Lumbar Spondylolisthesis, Lumbar Spondylosis, Synovial Cyst

Keywords

erector spinae plane block, minimally invasive spine surgery, regional anesthesia, randomized controlled trial

Brief summary

Opioid overuse is a widespread public health crisis in the United States with increasing rates of addiction and overdose deaths from prescription opioids. Reducing the need for opiate analgesics in the post-operative setting has become a high priority in minimizing long-term opioid use in surgical patients. This study will serve to demonstrate the efficacy of the addition of regional analgesic techniques in reducing post-operative opioid requirements in patients undergoing common lumbar spinal surgical procedures.

Detailed description

Opioid abuse and misuse remain a public health crisis in the United States, notably in patients with chronic pain from degenerative spine disease. Perioperative pain management for patients undergoing spinal surgery remains largely reliant on opioid medications, with several known adverse effects including, but not limited to delirium, postoperative urinary retention (POUR), constipation and nausea. These side effects contribute to increased hospital length of stay (LOS) with increased incidence of overall in-hospital complications, perioperative costs, and increased rates of opioid habituation and addiction. Dependence on prescription opioids has been associated with wide-ranging social and economic consequences including increased opioid overdose resulting in death, growing opioid-related incarcerations, and spiraling opioid-related healthcare cost from treatment of addiction, opioid-related mental health issues, and debilitating chronic pain. Long-term requirements for opioid medications may be associated with the use of higher doses of opioids in the perioperative period for patients undergoing invasive surgery for spinal degenerative conditions. Studies have demonstrated that patients who consume fewer opioids for 30 days after surgery are less likely to progress to become chronic opioid users. Regional analgesic techniques have shown promise in decreasing post-operative pain and opioid requirements in thoracic and abdominal surgery but difficulties with post-operative neurological assessments have limited their use in spinal surgery. Inter-fascial plane blocks, however, have emerged as a safe and potentially useful regional analgesic technique to mitigate the pain-inducing effects of posterior spine surgery. Erector Spinae Plane Blocks (ESPBs), specifically, involve ultra-sound guided injection of local anesthetic (LA) posteriorly beneath the erector spinae muscles resulting in longitudinal and ventrolateral spread of the anesthetic into the paravertebral space where the ventral and dorsal rami of the spinal nerves are located thereby inducing a multi-level analgesic effect. Depending upon the LA used, this effect may last for 4 to 36 hours. The proposed study will examine the efficacy of preoperative ESPBs in reducing post-operative opioid utilization and its associated complications specifically after minimally invasive (MIS) lumbar spine surgery including both decompressive and instrumented fusion procedures. The guiding principle of MIS spine surgery is reduction of iatrogenic injury by utilizing muscle dilating approaches and tubular retractors rather than conventional open, subperiosteal muscle stripping techniques. The latter typically results in muscle denervation and devascularization as well as postoperative muscle atrophy and dead space creation that increase postoperative pain, muscle dysfunction, prolonged recovery times and complications. Since MIS spinal surgical procedures preserve normal paraspinal musculature compared to open surgery, the magnitude of effect of ESPBs may actually be more pronounced in this population. The investigators hypothesize that by conducting this investigation within the rigor of a double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial, the results will definitively demonstrate that the addition of regional analgesia in the form of ESPB during MIS lumbar spine surgery will 1) reduce post-operative opioid consumption and 2) reduce opioid-related complications and hospital LOS but 3) have no adverse effects on postoperative pain control.

Interventions

DRUGBupivacaine-Epinephrine 0.25%-1:200,000 Injectable Solution plus clonidine

Bupivacaine-Epinephrine 0.25%-1:200,000 plus clonidine 50 micrograms in 30cc syringes administered as ESPB

DRUGnormal saline

normal saline in 30cc syringes administered using ESPB technique

Sponsors

John O'Toole
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Patients, surgeons and anesthesiologists will all be blinded to treatment allocation. Syringes containing the fluid to be injected will be prepared by pharmacy and labeled with subject number in such a manner to blind the anesthesiologist performing the ESPB to its contents.

Intervention model description

All patients will undergo surgery using an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) multi-modal anesthesia protocol that is currently in standard use for MIS lumbar spine surgical procedures. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to investigational and control arms.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-80 * Undergoing one of 3 procedure types: 1) 2 or more levels of MIS decompression (e.g., discectomy, foraminotomy, laminectomy); 2) 1-3 levels of MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) (with or without additional levels of MIS decompression for no greater than 3 total operative levels); 3) 1-3 levels of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) or MIS lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) accompanied by posterior percutaneous instrumentation at the same levels * Willing and able to give consent

Exclusion criteria

* Opioid tolerant at the time of the surgical procedure--defined as consuming greater than 30mg of morphine milligram equivalents (MME) daily (https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/prescribing/guideline.html) * Presence of an indwelling pain device (e.g., intrathecal opioid pump, spinal cord stimulator, dorsal root ganglion stimulator) * Known allergy to bupivacaine, clonidine or similar local anesthetics * Indication for surgery other than degenerative disease (e.g., neoplasm, infection, trauma) * Chronic kidney disease (stage 3 or greater), or hepatic failure * Active pregnancy * Disease process or mental illness that would preclude accurate evaluation of pain in the perioperative period * Active Worker's Compensation litigation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Inpatient opioid consumptionEvery 1 day during inpatient admission up to 30 daysMean per day inpatient opioid consumption in morphine milligram equivalents (MME)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-discharge opioid consumption14 days (+/- 7days) ,56 days (+/- 14 days) and 90 days (+/- 19) postoperativelyTotal and per day mean postoperative opioid consumption after hospital discharge in MME as recorded in medication diary by patients
Postoperative opioid prescriptions filledFrom hospital discharge to 90 days postoperatively• Total MMEs of opioid prescriptions filled as found on the Illinois Prescription Monitoring Program website
Length of hospital stayFrom time of surgery to time discharge criteria met in hours, up to 2160 hoursDuration of hospital stay postoperatively measured in days as determined by the time at which each patient met discharge criteria
Postoperative Urinary Retention (POUR)Immediately post-surgery to discharge, up to 90 daysIncidence of POUR measured as proportion of inpatient hospital days demonstrating the need for straight catheterization or foley placement
Post-operative deliriumImmediately post-surgery to dischargeIncidence of post-operative delirium as measured by the need for placement of physical restraints
Postoperative pain scoresEvery 1 day during inpatient admission up to 30 daysMean daily VAS (visual analog scale) pain scores recorded in the electronic medical record (EMR)
Peri-operative complicationsTime of surgery to 6 weeks postoperativeProspectively documented medical and surgical complications/adverse events (AEs) including rates of readmission or reoperation for AEs
Patient-reported pain and functional outcomesFrom baseline preoperative values to 6 week post-operative valuesChange in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain in the back and leg (0-10 with 10 being worst)

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTBart Jacher
bartosz_jacher@rush.edu(888) 352-7874
CONTACTMorgan Mulcahy
morgan_l_mulcahy@rush.edu(888) 352-7874
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJohn O'Toole, MD

Rush University Medical Center

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026