Skip to content

the Clinical Performance of a Moisture Resistant, M-TEG-P Phosphate Monomer Based Universal Adhesive (YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0) Compared to the Conventional Universal Adhesive (3m ESPE Single Bond Universal Adhesive)

Clinical Performance of a Moisture Resistant, M-TEG-P Phosphate Monomer-based Universal Adhesive in Geriatric Patients With Non-carious Cervical Lesions (NCLLs):A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05029479
Enrollment
28
Registered
2021-08-31
Start date
2021-10-13
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2022-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Geriatric Patients, Non-carious Cervical Lesions

Keywords

Non-Carious cervical lesions

Brief summary

this trial is to test the clinical performance of a novel moisture resistant, M-TEG-P phosphate monomer based universal adhesive (YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0) compared to the conventional universal adhesive (3m ESPE Single Bond Universal Adhesive) in geriatric patients with Non-carious Cervical lesions (NCLLs)

Detailed description

To evaluate the clinical performance of a novel moisture resistant, M-TEG-P phosphate monomer based universal adhesive (YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0) compared to the conventional universal adhesive (3m ESPE Single Bond Universal Adhesive) in geriatric patients with Non-carious Cervical lesions (NCLLs) P: Population: Geriatric patients with non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) I: Intervention: Novel moisture resistant, M-TEG-P phosphate monomer based universal adhesive (YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0) C: Comparator : 3m ESPE Single Bond Universal Adhesive O: Outcome:Clinical Performance using FDI criteria

Interventions

OTHERBonding in NCCLs

bonding agent which can resist moisture and has shorter decalcifying and curing time

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Non-carious cervical lesions in anterior and posterior teeth. 2. Geriatric patients from age 60 years and above. 3. Patients willing to commit to the whole period of the study. 4. Males & Females included.

Exclusion criteria

1. Lack of written informed consent to participate 2. Cervical hypersensitivities 3. Underage patients 4. Allergies to components of the materials used 5. Infectious diseases 6. Mucosal diseases with unclear diagnosis 7. Inadequate oral hygiene 8. Bruxism 9. High caries activity 10. Non-vital pulp 11. Severe periodontal diseases 12. Severe dysgnathia/traumatic occlusion 13. Undergoing orthodontic treatments 14. Undergoing bleaching procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of fractured restorations12 monthsFirst, visual inspection to ensure that there is no complete loss of retention of the restoration then tactile evaluation will be done using probe tip that will be held gently at right angle to the labial surface and move from restoration to tooth and vice versa to insure there is no rocking /fracture /ditching in the restoration following FDI criteria ( first visually for total loss followed by tactile inspection using FDI probe for any fracture /rocking or loss of retention.
Number of restorations with retention loss12 monthsFirst, visual inspection to ensure that there is no complete loss of retention of the restoration then tactile evaluation will be done using probe tip that will be held gently at right angle to the labial surface and move from restoration to tooth and vice versa to insure no rocking /fracture /ditching in the restoration following FDI criteria

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of restoration with change in colour or texture12 monthsEvaluation will be done visually following FDI criteria to ensure no change in colour or texture of the restoration
Number of restoration caused biological harm12 monthsEvaluation will be done following FDI criteria using FDI probe to ensure there is no change in restoration that caused any harm to the health of biological structure

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026