Skip to content

EnDovascular Therapy Plus Best Medical Treatment (BMT) Versus BMT Alone for MedIum VeSsel Occlusion sTroke

EnDovascular Therapy Plus Best Medical Treatment (BMT) Versus BMT Alone for MedIum VeSsel Occlusion sTroke - a prAgmatic, International, Multicentre, Randomized triaL (DISTAL)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05029414
Acronym
DISTAL
Enrollment
543
Registered
2021-08-31
Start date
2021-12-09
Completion date
2025-06-01
Last updated
2024-12-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Ischemic Stroke

Keywords

Stroke, Medium Vessel Occlusion, Endovascular Therapy

Brief summary

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is one of the main causes of disability and loss of quality adjusted life years. This study is to analyze whether endovascular therapy (EVT) in addition to best medical treatment (BMT) reduces the degree of disability and dependency in daily activities after a Medium Vessel Occlusion (MeVO) stroke compared to BMT alone.

Detailed description

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is one of the main causes of death and disability and thereby the third leading cause of loss of quality adjusted life years. For patients with an AIS due to an occlusion of the large vessels of the anterior circulation, endovascular therapy (EVT) has become a treatment standard. 20-40% of all AIS patients have occlusions of smaller vessels and present with a more distal isolated Medium Vessel Occlusion (MeVO). The primary objective of this randomized trial is to determine whether patients experiencing an AIS due to an isolated medium vessel occlusion have superior functional outcome (measured with the Modified Rankin Scale mRS at 90 days) when treated with EVT plus best medical treatment (BMT) compared to patients treated with BMT alone. In this trial, all commercially available, CE-certified revascularisation devices (i.e. stent-retriever, aspiration catheters and balloon guide catheters) can be used for EVT. All established techniques for the endovascular treatment of AIS patients are permitted and all decisions regarding treatment technique and choice of devices and/or medications are made solely by the treating physician.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEndovascular Therapy

Endovascular treatment of stroke is the non-surgical treatment for the sudden loss of brain function due to blood clots. The blood clot is removed from the blood via devices (i.e. stent-retriever, aspiration catheters and balloon guide) to achieve revascularization.

Sponsors

Swiss National Fund for Scientific Research
CollaboratorOTHER
Stryker Neurovascular
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Penumbra Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Phenox GmbH
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Rapid Medical
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Gottfried und Julia Bangerter- Rhyner-Stiftung, Basel
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

A treatment-blinded person will assess the primary outcome dependency and disability in everyday life (measured with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS)) at 90 days. All interviewers will be certified for the conductance of mRS. interviews.

Intervention model description

Pragmatic, parallel group, randomized, open label, superiority trial with blinded endpoint assessment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Acute ischemic stroke * Treatment (arterial puncture) can be initiated 2.1. Within 6 hours of last seen well (LSW) OR 2.2. Within 6 to 24 hours of LSW AND * CT Criteria: Evidence of a hypoperfusion-hypodensity mismatch (Absence of hypodensity on the noncontrast CT within ≥ 90% of the area of the hypoperfused lesion on perfusion CT) * MRI Criteria: Evidence of a diffusion-hyperintensity mismatch (Absence of hyperintensity on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging within ≥ 90% of the area of the diffusion weighted imaging(DWI) lesion) * Isolated medium vessel occlusion (i.e. an occlusion of the co-/non-dominant M2, the M3/M4 segment of theMCA, the A1/A2/A3 segment of the ACA or the P1/P2/P3 segment of the PCA) confirmed by CT or MRIAngiography * National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) Score of ≥ 4 points or symptoms deemed clearly disabling by treating physician (i.e. aphasia, hemianopia, etc.) * Informed Consent as documented by signature or fulfilling the criteria for emergency consent/ deferral consent * Agreement of treating physician to perform endovascular procedure

Exclusion criteria

* Acute intracranial haemorrhage * Patient bedridden or presenting from a nursing home * In-Hospital Stroke * Known (serious) sensitivity to radiographic contrast agents, nickel, titanium metals or their alloys * Foreseeable difficulties in follow-up due to geographic reasons (e.g. patients living abroad) * Pregnancy or lactating women. A negative pregnancy test before randomisation is required for all women with child-bearing potential. * Known history of arterial tortuosity, pre-existing stent, other arterial disease and/or known disease at the arterial access site that would prevent the device from reaching the target vessel and/or preclude safe recovery after EVT * Severe comorbidities, which will likely prevent improvement or follow-up * Radiological confirmed evidence of mass effect or intracranial tumour (except small meningioma) * Radiological confirmed evidence of cerebral vasculitis * Evidence of vessel recanalization prior to randomisation * Participation in another interventional trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Degree of dependency and disability in everyday life (measured with the mRS)at 90 days (± 14 days) after randomisationThe primary outcome is the degree of dependency and disability in everyday life (measured with the mRS) at 90 days. The mRS is the standard tool to assess neurological outcome in trials with acute severe brain disease. The scale runs from 0-6, running from perfect health without symptoms (= 0) to death (= 6).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Quality of life as assessed by the EuroQol-5Dat 90 ± 14 days and at 1 year after randomisationThe EQ-5D descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. the descriptive system produces a 5-digit health status profile that represents that person's level of reported problems on the five EQ-5D health dimensions
Patient residential statusat one year (± 30 days) after randomisationPatient residential status will be obtained through a telephone call to the patient or if not available his next of kin/caregiver one year (± 30 days) after randomisation
Change in percentage of penumbral tissue saved (Imaging Data Evaluation)at baseline and post-interventional at 24 hours (± 6 hours) post-randomisationPercentage of penumbral tissue saved (Imaging Data Evaluation): It is defined as the proportion of tissue at risk (defined as the mismatch volume derived from with RAPID Compute tomography perfusion (CTP) (IschemaView Inc.) at baseline that did not progress to infarction at 24h (derived from Magnet Resonance Imaging (MRI) (FLAIR and Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI)) or NCCT imaging.
Radiologic occurrence of intracranial haemorrhageswithin 24 hours (± 6 hours) post randomisationRadiologic occurrence of intracranial haemorrhages graded according to the modified Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST) definition
Change in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)24 hours post-randomization (+/- 6 hours)The scale is made up of 11 different elements that evaluate specific ability. The score for each ability is a number between 0 and 4, 0 being normal functioning and 4 being completely impaired. The patient's NIHSS score is calculated by adding the number for each element of the scale; 42 is the highest score possible. In the NIHSS, the higher the score, the more impaired a stroke patient is.
Assessment of Cognitive function using the validated Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA)at 90 days (± 14 days) after randomisationMoCA scores range between 0 and 30. A score of 26 or over is considered to be normal.
Degree of dependency and disability in everyday life (measured with the mRS)at one year (± 30 days) after randomisationDegree of dependency and disability in everyday life (measured with the mRS). The scale runs from 0-6, running from perfect health without symptoms (= 0) to death (= 6).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in symptomatic intracranial haemorrhageat 24 ± 6 hours post randomisationChange in symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage by radiologic categorization on the basis of the pre-randomisation imaging at day 0 (Non contrast computed tomography (NCCT)/Magnet Resonance Imaging (MRI), Computed tomography angiography (CTA)/Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA), Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI)/Perfusion Weighted Imaging (PWI) MRI, Compute tomography (CT) perfusion) and the post-interventional imaging at 24 ± 6 hours.
Change in All-cause mortality (Safety Outcome)at days 7-10 or discharge if earlier, 90 day ± 14 days; and one year ± 30 days after randomisation.Change in All-cause mortality
Change in Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)at 24 h ± 6h, days 7-10 or discharge if earlier and at 90 ± 14 days after randomisationChange in Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Countries

Belgium, Finland, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026