Skip to content

Virtual Reality Intervention Procedure Simulator

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study for the Efficacy of Virtual Reality Intervention Procedure Simulator on the Training of Pain Procedures

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05029219
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-08-31
Start date
2021-08-31
Completion date
2021-11-30
Last updated
2022-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Novice Doctor

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to prove the effectiveness of the virtual reality program in educating lumbar transforaminal epidural blocks to novice doctors.

Interventions

DEVICEArm I (Virtual reality group)

In the preparatory session, the participant is given a survey. It is about demographic information such as gender, age, and age, as well as prior experience with the procedure. The primary test is performed with a fluoroscopy guided lumbar transforaminal epidural block with a human-shaped phantom. After that, the test group and the control group receive the same audiovisual education for about 5 minutes. The test group receives about 60 minutes of training using a virtual reality program.

DEVICEArm II (Self study group)

In the preparatory session, the participant is given a survey. It is about demographic information such as gender, age, and age, as well as prior experience with the procedure. The primary test is performed with a fluoroscopy guided lumbar transforaminal epidural block with a human-shaped phantom. After that, the test group and the control group receive the same audiovisual education for about 5 minutes. The control group have provided with video materials and books provided during audiovisual education and have given time for self-study for 60 minutes. Subsequently, a second test is performed with a fluroscopy-guided lumbar transforaminal epidural block with a human-shaped phantom.

Sponsors

Gangnam Severance Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Residents in department of anesthesiology and pain medicine unfamiliar with fluoroscopy guided epidural block

Exclusion criteria

* Residents in department of anesthesiology and pain medicine familiar with fluoroscopy guided epidural block

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Checklist score60 min of education programsWhen all training courses are completed and a post-test is performed on the phantom, it is determined how much the checklist score has changed compared to the screening time. Range from 0 to 7. Minimum score means worst and maximum score means good performance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global rating score60 min of education programsWhen all training courses are completed and a post-test is performed on the phantom, it is determined how much the global rating score has changed compared to the screening time. Range from 7 to 35. Minimum score means worst and maximum score means good performance.
Time taken to perform lumbar transforaminal epidural injectionProcedure durationDuring the pre-test and post-test, how long it takes to perform the procedure is compared.
Number of fluroscopy shots when performing lumbar transforaminal epidural injection under a fluoroscopy guideProcedure durationIt is determined by comparing the number of fluroscopy pictures
Participants' satisfaction with the curriculum60 min of education programsAfter the completion of all training and testing sessions, have participants rate their satisfaction with the training on a 100-point scale. Range from 0 to 100. Minimum score means less satisfaction and maximum score means better satisfaction.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026