Skip to content

A Rollover Study to Further Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Palovarotene Capsules in Male and Female Participants Aged ≥14 Years With Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) Who Have Completed the Relevant Parent Studies.

Rollover Study; Multicentre, Phase III, Open-label Study to Further Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Palovarotene Capsules in Male and Female Participants Aged ≥14 Years With Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) Who Have Completed Study PVO-1A-301 or PVO-1A-202/PVO-1A-204 and May Benefit From Palovarotene Therapy.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05027802
Acronym
PIVOINE
Enrollment
61
Registered
2021-08-30
Start date
2022-03-14
Completion date
2024-11-30
Last updated
2025-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP)

Brief summary

The main objective of this study is to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of palovarotene in adult and paediatric participants with FOP. The aim of the study is also to ensure treatment continuity to participants who have completed one of the parent studies (Study PVO-1A-301, Study PVO-1A-202 and Study PVO-1A-204) and who, in the investigator's judgement, may benefit from palovarotene therapy.

Interventions

Palovarotene will be taken orally once daily at approximately the same time each day.

Sponsors

Ipsen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participant has completed the EOS or End of Treatment Visit of Study PVO-1A-301 or PVO-1A-202 (PVO-1A-202 Parts C and D correspond to Study PVO-1A-204 in France) and did not previously withdraw consent from any of the parent studies to be eligible for Study CLIN-60120-452. * Participant must be ≥14 years of age (aligned with the age of treated participants in the ongoing parent studies PVO-1A-301 and PVO-1A-202/PVO-1A-204) and qualify as 100% skeletally mature (if \<18 years, based on assessments carried out at parent EOS Visit; if ≥18 years, automatically considered 100% skeletally mature) or have reached final adult height based on investigator's assessment, at the time the Study CLIN- 60120-452 informed consent is signed.

Exclusion criteria

* History of allergy or hypersensitivity to retinoids, gelatin, lactose (note that lactose intolerance is not exclusionary) or palovarotene, or unresponsiveness to prior treatment with palovarotene. * Uncontrolled cardiovascular, hepatic, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, metabolic, ophthalmologic, immunologic, psychiatric, or other significant disease. * Symptomatic vertebral fracture. * Intercurrent known or suspected non-healed fracture at any location; * Any other medical condition/clinically significant abnormalities that would expose the participant to undue risk or interfere with study assessments. * Amylase or lipase \>2× above the upper limit of normal (ULN) or with a history of chronic pancreatitis. * Elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>2.5× ULN. * Fasting triglycerides \>400 mg/dL with or without therapy. * Suicidal ideation (type 4 or 5) or any suicidal behaviour at the Inclusion Visit as defined by the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). * Current use of vitamin A or beta carotene, multivitamins containing vitamin A or beta carotene, or herbal preparations, fish oil, and unable or unwilling to discontinue use of these products during palovarotene treatment. * Exposure to synthetic oral retinoids other than palovarotene within 4 weeks of the Inclusion Visit. * Concurrent treatment with tetracycline or any tetracycline derivatives due to the potential increased risk of pseudotumor cerebri. * Use of concomitant medications that are strong inhibitors or inducers of cytochrome P450 (CYP450) 3A4 activity; or kinase inhibitors such as imatinib. * Palovarotene is reimbursed in the country where the study is being conducted. * Any reason that, in the opinion of the investigator, would lead to the inability of the participant and/or family to comply with the protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With All Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious and Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Serious and Non-serious Treatment-related Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsFrom signing the informed consent form (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose, approximately 32 monthsAn adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or significant medical event. A TEAE was defined as any AE that occurred after signing the informed consent form of this study or an ongoing AE from the parent study with a worsening in severity or relationship to the study treatment following transition to this study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From the Inclusion Visit in the Use of Assistive Devices and Adaptations (Aids) for Daily Living at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Inclusion Visit (Day 1) and Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30The use of assistive devices and adaptations (aids) for daily living was collected using the FOP assistive devices assessment at each visit. Assistive devices and adaptations include mobility aids, eating tools, personal care tools, bathroom aids and devices, bedroom aids and devices, home adaptions, work environment adaptions, technology adaptions, sports and recreation adaptions, school adaptions and medical therapies for daily living. The mean of total number of assistive devices and adaptations for daily living being used is presented. The Inclusion Visit was the first study visit (Day 1) and first administration of palovarotene in this study.
Change From the Inclusion Visit in Percentage of Worst Score Using the Adult Form of the Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Physical Function Questionnaire (FOP-PFQ) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Inclusion Visit (Day 1) and Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30The FOP-PFQ is a disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure of physical impairment; includes 28 questions related to activities of daily living and physical performance scored on a scale of 1 to 5 with lower scores indicating that participant has more difficulty completing those tasks. Total score, upper extremities subscore and mobility subscore is calculated as follows: total score: sum of the scores from each question (range 28 to 140); upper extremities subscore: sum of the scores from 15 questions (questions 1-12, 14, 25 and 26; range 15 to 75); mobility subscore: the sum of the scores from 13 questions (questions 13, 15-24, 27 and 28; range 13 to 65). The scores were transformed to reflect a percentage of worst score which ranged from 0% to 100% with 0% indicating the best possible function and 100% (higher score) indicating the worst possible function. Mean is presented. Inclusion Visit was first study visit (Day 1) and first administration of palovarotene in this study.
Annualized Rate of Healthcare Utilization (HU) in Participants With Fibrodysplasia Ossificans ProgressivaUp to approximately 32 monthsAnnualized HU rate was defined as the (number of HU during the study/duration of participant participation in the study in days) \* 365.25. Annualized rate for total health care services utilized is presented.
Change From the Inclusion Visit in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Inclusion Visit (Day 1) and Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Lung function parameters including FVC were obtained by spirometry. The Inclusion Visit was the first study visit (Day 1) and first administration of palovarotene in this study.
Change From the Inclusion Visit in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Inclusion Visit (Day 1) and Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Lung function parameters including FEV1 were obtained by spirometry. The Inclusion Visit was the first study visit (Day 1) and first administration of palovarotene in this study.
Change From the Inclusion Visit in Predicted FEV1/FVC Ratio at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Inclusion Visit (Day 1) and Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30The ratio of FEV1 to FVC was calculated. Lung function parameters were obtained by spirometry. The Inclusion Visit was the first study visit (Day 1) and first administration of palovarotene in this study.
Change From the Inclusion Visit in Cumulative Analogue Joint Involvement Scale (CAJIS) Total Score at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Inclusion Visit (Day 1) and Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30The CAJIS is an objective measure of joint movement completed by the investigator to document total joint involvement. This scale assesses functional disability by categorizing range of motion across 12 joints (both right and left shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee and ankle joints) and 3 body regions (cervical spine, thoracic/lumbar spine and jaw), with each joint/region assessed as: 0=normal (\<10% deficit); 1=partially impaired (10% to 90% deficit) and 2=functionally ankylosed (\>90% deficit). The CAJIS total score is calculated as the sum of the scores of all joints/regions and ranges from 0 (no involvement) to 30 (maximally involved). Higher score indicated worse outcome. The Inclusion Visit was the first study visit (Day 1) and first administration of palovarotene in this study.
Change From the Inclusion Visit in Physical and Mental Function Using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Scale at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Inclusion Visit (Day 1) and Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30The PROMIS Global Health Scale is a patient-reported outcome measure of physical and mental function. The adult form (developed for participants \>=15 years old) was used for all participants,consists of 10 questions from which 2 scores are calculated: global physical health score (GPH) and global mental health (GMH) score, each ranging from 4 (worse health) to 20 (better health). GPH score:sum of scores from Questions 3, 6, 7 and 8 and GMH score:sum of scores from Questions 2, 4, 5 and 10.These scores were converted to a T-score whose distributions were standardized such that value of 50 represented average (mean) for general population and increments of +/- 10 points represented +/- 1 standard deviation away from the norm.Higher T-scores indicated better physical/mental health. A T-score \<50 indicated worse health than general population, while a T-score \>50 indicated better health. Inclusion Visit was first study visit (Day 1) and first administration of palovarotene in this study.
Number of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonths 6, 12, 18 and 24Number of participants with at least 1 flare-up and intercurrent flare-ups since last visit is presented. Intercurrent flare-ups were defined as a new flare-up or marked worsening of the original flare up at any time during a flare-up-based treatment cycle. Outcome of flare-ups resulting in movement restriction and bone formations in participants is presented. Movement restriction includes categories like better, same, slightly worse, moderately worse and severely worse movement than before.
Number of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonths 6, 12, 18 and 24Number of participants with flare-ups by body locations including shoulder, elbow, hip, knee, ankle or foot, back, jaw and submandibular area and other (includes all other locations than mentioned) is presented.
Duration of Flare-up at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Duration of flare-up was defined as (date of end of flare-up - date of start of flare-up + 1).
Percentage of Participants With Extra Bone Growth at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Percentage of participants with at least 1 extra bone growth associated or not with a flare-up since last visit is presented.
Change From the Inclusion Visit in Percent Predicted Diffusion Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Inclusion Visit (Day 1) and Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30The DLCO test provides information on the efficiency of gas transfer from alveolar air into the bloodstream. The Inclusion Visit was the first study visit (Day 1) and first administration of palovarotene in this study.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Italy, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This single-arm, rollover, multicenter, Phase III, open-label study was conducted at 12 investigational sites in 9 countries from 14-Mar-2022 to 30-Nov-2024 in participants \>=14 years with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) who had completed parent study PVO-1A-301 (NCT03312634) or PVO-1A-202 (NCT02279095)/PVO-1A-204 (NCT02979769) and continued to benefit from palovarotene therapy. A total of 61 participants were enrolled in the study of which 59 received treatment.

Pre-assignment details

This study consisted of an Inclusion visit which included signing of informed consent form (Day 1), a continuous dosing treatment period (including a follow-up visit every 6 months), and an end of study/early withdrawal visit. Participants were eligible for the study whether they received chronic or flare-up treatment in the parent study at the time of transition.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Palovarotene
Participants continued to receive palovarotene 5 mg orally once daily until it was reimbursed in the country where the study was being conducted or another access program became available or until the study end date, whichever occurred first, up to approximately 32 months. In case of flare-up symptoms or substantial high risk traumatic events (likely to lead to a flare-up), participants received palovarotene 20 mg orally once daily for 4 weeks followed by 10 mg orally once daily for 8 weeks for a total of 12 weeks even if symptoms resolved earlier.
59
Total59

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event2
Overall StudyDeath2
Overall StudyOther1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject18

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPalovarotene
Age, Continuous22.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
33 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
16 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
15 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
38 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 59
other
Total, other adverse events
45 / 59
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 59

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With All Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious and Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Serious and Non-serious Treatment-related Treatment-emergent Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or significant medical event. A TEAE was defined as any AE that occurred after signing the informed consent form of this study or an ongoing AE from the parent study with a worsening in severity or relationship to the study treatment following transition to this study.

Time frame: From signing the informed consent form (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose, approximately 32 months

Population: The FAS/safety set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of palovarotene in this study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With All Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious and Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Serious and Non-serious Treatment-related Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsAll TEAEs54 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With All Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious and Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Serious and Non-serious Treatment-related Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsSerious TEAEs9 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With All Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious and Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Serious and Non-serious Treatment-related Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsNon-serious TEAEs53 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With All Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious and Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Serious and Non-serious Treatment-related Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsSerious treatment-related TEAEs1 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With All Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious and Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Serious and Non-serious Treatment-related Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsNon-serious treatment-related TEAEs38 Participants
Secondary

Annualized Rate of Healthcare Utilization (HU) in Participants With Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva

Annualized HU rate was defined as the (number of HU during the study/duration of participant participation in the study in days) \* 365.25. Annualized rate for total health care services utilized is presented.

Time frame: Up to approximately 32 months

Population: The FAS/safety set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of palovarotene in this study. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PalovaroteneAnnualized Rate of Healthcare Utilization (HU) in Participants With Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva21.7 HU per participant yearStandard Deviation 31.4
Secondary

Change From the Inclusion Visit in Cumulative Analogue Joint Involvement Scale (CAJIS) Total Score at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30

The CAJIS is an objective measure of joint movement completed by the investigator to document total joint involvement. This scale assesses functional disability by categorizing range of motion across 12 joints (both right and left shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee and ankle joints) and 3 body regions (cervical spine, thoracic/lumbar spine and jaw), with each joint/region assessed as: 0=normal (\<10% deficit); 1=partially impaired (10% to 90% deficit) and 2=functionally ankylosed (\>90% deficit). The CAJIS total score is calculated as the sum of the scores of all joints/regions and ranges from 0 (no involvement) to 30 (maximally involved). Higher score indicated worse outcome. The Inclusion Visit was the first study visit (Day 1) and first administration of palovarotene in this study.

Time frame: Inclusion Visit (Day 1) and Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30

Population: The FAS/safety set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of palovarotene in this study. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Cumulative Analogue Joint Involvement Scale (CAJIS) Total Score at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 60.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Cumulative Analogue Joint Involvement Scale (CAJIS) Total Score at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 121.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Cumulative Analogue Joint Involvement Scale (CAJIS) Total Score at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 181.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Cumulative Analogue Joint Involvement Scale (CAJIS) Total Score at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 241.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Cumulative Analogue Joint Involvement Scale (CAJIS) Total Score at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 302.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
Secondary

Change From the Inclusion Visit in Percentage of Worst Score Using the Adult Form of the Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Physical Function Questionnaire (FOP-PFQ) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30

The FOP-PFQ is a disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure of physical impairment; includes 28 questions related to activities of daily living and physical performance scored on a scale of 1 to 5 with lower scores indicating that participant has more difficulty completing those tasks. Total score, upper extremities subscore and mobility subscore is calculated as follows: total score: sum of the scores from each question (range 28 to 140); upper extremities subscore: sum of the scores from 15 questions (questions 1-12, 14, 25 and 26; range 15 to 75); mobility subscore: the sum of the scores from 13 questions (questions 13, 15-24, 27 and 28; range 13 to 65). The scores were transformed to reflect a percentage of worst score which ranged from 0% to 100% with 0% indicating the best possible function and 100% (higher score) indicating the worst possible function. Mean is presented. Inclusion Visit was first study visit (Day 1) and first administration of palovarotene in this study.

Time frame: Inclusion Visit (Day 1) and Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30

Population: The FAS/safety set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of palovarotene in this study. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percentage of Worst Score Using the Adult Form of the Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Physical Function Questionnaire (FOP-PFQ) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 6: total score0.74 percentage of scoreStandard Deviation 6.37
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percentage of Worst Score Using the Adult Form of the Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Physical Function Questionnaire (FOP-PFQ) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 12: total score2.39 percentage of scoreStandard Deviation 10.21
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percentage of Worst Score Using the Adult Form of the Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Physical Function Questionnaire (FOP-PFQ) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 18: total score4.77 percentage of scoreStandard Deviation 12.39
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percentage of Worst Score Using the Adult Form of the Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Physical Function Questionnaire (FOP-PFQ) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 24: total score7.80 percentage of scoreStandard Deviation 15.15
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percentage of Worst Score Using the Adult Form of the Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Physical Function Questionnaire (FOP-PFQ) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 30: total score13.79 percentage of scoreStandard Deviation 21.98
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percentage of Worst Score Using the Adult Form of the Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Physical Function Questionnaire (FOP-PFQ) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 6: upper extremities subscore0.70 percentage of scoreStandard Deviation 6.87
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percentage of Worst Score Using the Adult Form of the Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Physical Function Questionnaire (FOP-PFQ) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 12: upper extremities subscore1.12 percentage of scoreStandard Deviation 8.52
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percentage of Worst Score Using the Adult Form of the Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Physical Function Questionnaire (FOP-PFQ) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 18: upper extremities subscore3.24 percentage of scoreStandard Deviation 11.28
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percentage of Worst Score Using the Adult Form of the Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Physical Function Questionnaire (FOP-PFQ) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 24: upper extremities subscore5.54 percentage of scoreStandard Deviation 12.42
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percentage of Worst Score Using the Adult Form of the Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Physical Function Questionnaire (FOP-PFQ) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 30: upper extremities subscore8.15 percentage of scoreStandard Deviation 11.5
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percentage of Worst Score Using the Adult Form of the Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Physical Function Questionnaire (FOP-PFQ) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 6: mobility subscore0.74 percentage of scoreStandard Deviation 9.15
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percentage of Worst Score Using the Adult Form of the Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Physical Function Questionnaire (FOP-PFQ) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 12: mobility subscore3.90 percentage of scoreStandard Deviation 14.98
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percentage of Worst Score Using the Adult Form of the Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Physical Function Questionnaire (FOP-PFQ) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 18: mobility subscore6.53 percentage of scoreStandard Deviation 17.45
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percentage of Worst Score Using the Adult Form of the Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Physical Function Questionnaire (FOP-PFQ) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 24: mobility subscore10.38 percentage of scoreStandard Deviation 23.08
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percentage of Worst Score Using the Adult Form of the Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Physical Function Questionnaire (FOP-PFQ) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 30: mobility subscore20.30 percentage of scoreStandard Deviation 36.44
Secondary

Change From the Inclusion Visit in Percent Predicted Diffusion Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30

The DLCO test provides information on the efficiency of gas transfer from alveolar air into the bloodstream. The Inclusion Visit was the first study visit (Day 1) and first administration of palovarotene in this study.

Time frame: Inclusion Visit (Day 1) and Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30

Population: The FAS/safety set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of palovarotene in this study. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percent Predicted Diffusion Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 6-1.5 percent predicted DLCOStandard Deviation 7.9
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percent Predicted Diffusion Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 12-5.3 percent predicted DLCOStandard Deviation 12.6
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percent Predicted Diffusion Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 18-4.4 percent predicted DLCOStandard Deviation 16.5
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percent Predicted Diffusion Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 24-4.8 percent predicted DLCOStandard Deviation 11.4
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percent Predicted Diffusion Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 30-20.0 percent predicted DLCOStandard Deviation 20.3
Secondary

Change From the Inclusion Visit in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30

Lung function parameters including FEV1 were obtained by spirometry. The Inclusion Visit was the first study visit (Day 1) and first administration of palovarotene in this study.

Time frame: Inclusion Visit (Day 1) and Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30

Population: The FAS/safety set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of palovarotene in this study. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 61.8 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 5.9
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 12-3.1 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 9.6
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 18-5.3 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 11.8
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 24-3.8 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 6.6
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 30-10.0 percent predicted FEV1Standard Deviation 11.1
Secondary

Change From the Inclusion Visit in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30

Lung function parameters including FVC were obtained by spirometry. The Inclusion Visit was the first study visit (Day 1) and first administration of palovarotene in this study.

Time frame: Inclusion Visit (Day 1) and Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30

Population: The FAS/safety set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of palovarotene in this study. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 61.2 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 5.5
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 12-0.7 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 6.8
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 18-3.9 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 9.8
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 24-1.6 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 5.8
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 30-2.8 percent predicted FVCStandard Deviation 3.8
Secondary

Change From the Inclusion Visit in Physical and Mental Function Using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Scale at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30

The PROMIS Global Health Scale is a patient-reported outcome measure of physical and mental function. The adult form (developed for participants \>=15 years old) was used for all participants,consists of 10 questions from which 2 scores are calculated: global physical health score (GPH) and global mental health (GMH) score, each ranging from 4 (worse health) to 20 (better health). GPH score:sum of scores from Questions 3, 6, 7 and 8 and GMH score:sum of scores from Questions 2, 4, 5 and 10.These scores were converted to a T-score whose distributions were standardized such that value of 50 represented average (mean) for general population and increments of +/- 10 points represented +/- 1 standard deviation away from the norm.Higher T-scores indicated better physical/mental health. A T-score \<50 indicated worse health than general population, while a T-score \>50 indicated better health. Inclusion Visit was first study visit (Day 1) and first administration of palovarotene in this study.

Time frame: Inclusion Visit (Day 1) and Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30

Population: The FAS/safety set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of palovarotene in this study. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Physical and Mental Function Using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Scale at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 6: GPH-0.6 T-scoreStandard Deviation 4.4
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Physical and Mental Function Using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Scale at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 12: GPH-1.7 T-scoreStandard Deviation 5
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Physical and Mental Function Using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Scale at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 18: GPH-2.9 T-scoreStandard Deviation 5
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Physical and Mental Function Using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Scale at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 24: GPH-1.9 T-scoreStandard Deviation 5.8
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Physical and Mental Function Using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Scale at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 30: GPH-3.9 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Physical and Mental Function Using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Scale at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 6: GMH-1.0 T-scoreStandard Deviation 4.8
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Physical and Mental Function Using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Scale at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 12: GMH-1.5 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.3
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Physical and Mental Function Using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Scale at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 18: GMH-2.3 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.9
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Physical and Mental Function Using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Scale at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 24: GMH-2.2 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Physical and Mental Function Using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Scale at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 30: GMH-5.7 T-scoreStandard Deviation 5.1
Secondary

Change From the Inclusion Visit in Predicted FEV1/FVC Ratio at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30

The ratio of FEV1 to FVC was calculated. Lung function parameters were obtained by spirometry. The Inclusion Visit was the first study visit (Day 1) and first administration of palovarotene in this study.

Time frame: Inclusion Visit (Day 1) and Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30

Population: The FAS/safety set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of palovarotene in this study. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Predicted FEV1/FVC Ratio at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 60.0163 ratioStandard Deviation 0.0574
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Predicted FEV1/FVC Ratio at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 12-0.0323 ratioStandard Deviation 0.1358
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Predicted FEV1/FVC Ratio at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 18-0.0137 ratioStandard Deviation 0.0888
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Predicted FEV1/FVC Ratio at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 24-0.0365 ratioStandard Deviation 0.0994
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in Predicted FEV1/FVC Ratio at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 30-0.1268 ratioStandard Deviation 0.1564
Secondary

Change From the Inclusion Visit in the Use of Assistive Devices and Adaptations (Aids) for Daily Living at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30

The use of assistive devices and adaptations (aids) for daily living was collected using the FOP assistive devices assessment at each visit. Assistive devices and adaptations include mobility aids, eating tools, personal care tools, bathroom aids and devices, bedroom aids and devices, home adaptions, work environment adaptions, technology adaptions, sports and recreation adaptions, school adaptions and medical therapies for daily living. The mean of total number of assistive devices and adaptations for daily living being used is presented. The Inclusion Visit was the first study visit (Day 1) and first administration of palovarotene in this study.

Time frame: Inclusion Visit (Day 1) and Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30

Population: The FAS/safety set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of palovarotene in this study. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in the Use of Assistive Devices and Adaptations (Aids) for Daily Living at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 6-0.7 number of aidsStandard Deviation 3.4
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in the Use of Assistive Devices and Adaptations (Aids) for Daily Living at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 121.1 number of aidsStandard Deviation 4.7
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in the Use of Assistive Devices and Adaptations (Aids) for Daily Living at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 181.4 number of aidsStandard Deviation 5.7
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in the Use of Assistive Devices and Adaptations (Aids) for Daily Living at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 241.2 number of aidsStandard Deviation 5.1
PalovaroteneChange From the Inclusion Visit in the Use of Assistive Devices and Adaptations (Aids) for Daily Living at Months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30Month 302.8 number of aidsStandard Deviation 7.4
Secondary

Duration of Flare-up at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24

Duration of flare-up was defined as (date of end of flare-up - date of start of flare-up + 1).

Time frame: Months 6, 12, 18 and 24

Population: The FAS/safety set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of palovarotene in this study. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PalovaroteneDuration of Flare-up at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Month 6130.7 daysStandard Deviation 153.3
PalovaroteneDuration of Flare-up at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Month 12121.7 daysStandard Deviation 102.7
PalovaroteneDuration of Flare-up at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Month 1872.4 daysStandard Deviation 42.6
PalovaroteneDuration of Flare-up at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Month 2472.3 daysStandard Deviation 53.9
Secondary

Number of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up Outcomes

Number of participants with at least 1 flare-up and intercurrent flare-ups since last visit is presented. Intercurrent flare-ups were defined as a new flare-up or marked worsening of the original flare up at any time during a flare-up-based treatment cycle. Outcome of flare-ups resulting in movement restriction and bone formations in participants is presented. Movement restriction includes categories like better, same, slightly worse, moderately worse and severely worse movement than before.

Time frame: Months 6, 12, 18 and 24

Population: The FAS/safety set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of palovarotene in this study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 6: better movement0 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 6: at least 1 flare up since last visit27 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 12: at least 1 flare up since last visit26 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 18: at least 1 flare up since last visit15 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 24: at least 1 flare up since last visit4 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 6: intercurrent flare-ups since last visit7 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 12: intercurrent flare-ups since last visit4 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 18: intercurrent flare-ups since last visit4 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 24: intercurrent flare-ups since last visit0 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 6: same movement22 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 6: slightly worse movement7 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 6: moderately worse movement5 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 6: severely worse movement1 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 12: better movement1 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 12: same movement17 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 12: slightly worse movement10 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 12: moderately worse movement5 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 12: severely worse movement0 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 18: better movement0 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 18: same movement7 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 18: slightly worse movement7 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 18: moderately worse movement1 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 18: severely worse movement1 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 24: better movement0 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 24: same movement1 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 24: slightly worse movement3 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 24: moderately worse movement0 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 24: severely worse movement1 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 6: bone formation5 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 12: bone formation5 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 18: bone formation1 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups and Flare-up OutcomesMonth 24: bone formation0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Flare-ups by Body Location

Number of participants with flare-ups by body locations including shoulder, elbow, hip, knee, ankle or foot, back, jaw and submandibular area and other (includes all other locations than mentioned) is presented.

Time frame: Months 6, 12, 18 and 24

Population: The FAS/safety set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of palovarotene in this study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 6: elbow3 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 6: shoulder8 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 6: hip5 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 6: knee5 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 6: ankle or foot3 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 6: back4 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 6: jaw and submandibular area4 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 6: other14 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 12: shoulder4 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 12: elbow2 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 12: hip5 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 12: knee3 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 12: ankle or foot5 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 12: back2 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 12: jaw and submandibular area3 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 12: other12 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 18: shoulder4 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 18: elbow1 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 18: hip3 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 18: knee2 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 18: ankle or foot2 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 18: back1 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 18: jaw and submandibular area0 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 18: other8 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 24: shoulder1 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 24: elbow0 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 24: hip0 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 24: knee1 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 24: ankle or foot1 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 24: back0 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 24: jaw and submandibular area0 Participants
PalovaroteneNumber of Participants With Flare-ups by Body LocationMonth 24: other2 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Extra Bone Growth at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24

Percentage of participants with at least 1 extra bone growth associated or not with a flare-up since last visit is presented.

Time frame: Months 6, 12, 18 and 24

Population: The FAS/safety set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of palovarotene in this study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PalovarotenePercentage of Participants With Extra Bone Growth at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Month 6: associated8.5 percentage of participants
PalovarotenePercentage of Participants With Extra Bone Growth at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Month 6: not associated3.4 percentage of participants
PalovarotenePercentage of Participants With Extra Bone Growth at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Month 12: associated8.5 percentage of participants
PalovarotenePercentage of Participants With Extra Bone Growth at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Month 12: not associated8.5 percentage of participants
PalovarotenePercentage of Participants With Extra Bone Growth at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Month 18: associated1.7 percentage of participants
PalovarotenePercentage of Participants With Extra Bone Growth at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Month 18: not associated3.4 percentage of participants
PalovarotenePercentage of Participants With Extra Bone Growth at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Month 24: associated0 percentage of participants
PalovarotenePercentage of Participants With Extra Bone Growth at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Month 24: not associated3.4 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026