Skip to content

Magnetic Resonance-guided Adaptive Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Hepatic Metastases

Magnetic Resonance-guided Adaptive Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Hepatic Metastases - MAESTRO -

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05027711
Acronym
MAESTRO
Enrollment
90
Registered
2021-08-30
Start date
2021-08-12
Completion date
2030-01-31
Last updated
2026-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatic Metastasis

Keywords

Magentic Resonance-guided Adaptive Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Brief summary

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an established local treatment method for patients with hepatic oligometastases. Liver metastases often occur in close proximity to radiosensitive organs at risk (OARs). This limits the possibility to apply sufficiently high doses needed for optimal local control. MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is expected to hold potential to improve hepatic SBRT by offering superior soft-tissue contrast for enhanced target identification as well as the benefit of daily real-time adaptive treatment. The MAESTRO trial therefore aims to assess the potential advantages of adaptive, gated MR-guided SBRT (MRgSBRT) compared to conventional SBRT at a standard linac using an ITV (internal target volume) approach (ITV-SBRT).

Detailed description

Hepatic SBRT is a well-established local treatment method for technically or medically inoperable hepatic metastases. However, clinicians are often restricted in the utilization of hepatic SBRT due to dose limitations of the uninvolved liver and nearby OARs (e.g. small bowel, stomach, kidney). MR-guided radiotherapy with its superior soft-tissue contrast is believed to facilitate the precise detection of tumor position and interfractional changes in patient anatomy. Respiratory gating at the MR-Linac enables real-time visualization of the tumor as well as synchronization of beam delivery to the patient's breathing . Therefore, safety margins and thus the irradiated volume can possibly be decreased with MRgSBRT in comparison to ITV-based SBRT, reducing the risk of treatment-associated toxicity. Hepatic MRgSBRT of smaller target volumes might further offer the possibility of dose escalation for increasing local control. To our knowledge, only two retrospective analyses including 26 and 29 patients as well as one case report about hepatic MR-guided SBRT using a MR-Linac can be found in literature. As MR-guided adaptive SBRT is very staff intense and time consuming compared to standard ITV-based SBRT, prospective studies are needed to demonstrate the expected benefits of MR-guided adaptive SBRT. This trial will be conducted as a prospective, randomized, three-armed phase II study in 82 patients with hepatic metastases (solid malignant tumor, 1-3 hepatic metastases confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), maximum diameter of each metastasis ≤ 5 cm (in case of 3 metastases: sum of diameters ≤ 12cm), age ≥ 18 years, Karnofsky Performance Score ≥ 60%). If a biologically effective dose (BED) ≥ 100 Gy is feasible based on ITV-based planning, patients will be randomized to either MRgSBRT (Arm A) or ITV-based SBRT (Arm B). If a lesion cannot be treated with a BED ≥ 100 Gy, the patient will be treated in Arm C with MRgSBRT at the highest possible dose.

Interventions

RADIATIONITV (Internal target volume)-based Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (ITV-SBRT)

ITV (Internal target volume)-based Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (ITV-SBRT)

RADIATIONMRgSBRT (Magnetic Resonance-guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy)

MRgSBRT (Magnetic Resonance-guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy)

Sponsors

University Hospital Heidelberg
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* confirmed underlying solid malignant tumor (no germ cell tumor, leukemia, lymphoma) * 1-3 hepatic metastases confirmed by pre-therapeutic MRI * indication for SBRT of 1-3 hepatic metastases * maximum diameter each hepatic metastasis ≤ 5 cm (in case of 3 metastases: sum of diameters ≤ 12 cm) * age ≥ 18 years of age * Karnofsky Performance Score ≥ 60% * ability to lie still on the radiotherapy treatment couch for at least one hour * ability to hold one's breath for more than 25 seconds * for women with childbearing potential, adequate contraception * ability of subject to understand character and individual consequences of the clinical trial * written informed consent (must be available before enrolment in the trial)

Exclusion criteria

* refusal of the patients to take part in the study * patients with primary liver cancer (eg. HCC, CCC) * patients after liver transplantation * impairment of liver function to an extent contraindicating radiotherapy (to the discretion of the treating radiation oncologist) * active acute hepatic/biliary infection (e.g. hepatitis, cholangitis, cholecystitis) * previous radiotherapy of the hepatobiliary system, if previous and current target volumes overlap MAESTRO Study Studienprotokoll Seite 25 von 54 Version 1.0 vom 17.12.2020 * patients who have not yet recovered from acute toxicities of prior therapies * claustrophobia * pregnant or lactating women * contraindications against performing contrast-enhanced MRI scans (pacemakers, other implants making MRI impossible, allergy to gadolinium (GD)-based contrast agent) * participation in another competing clinical study or observation period of competing trials

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment related Toxicitywithin the first year after radiation treatmentoccurrence of treatment-related gastrointestinal or hepatobiliary CTCAE V5.0 toxicity of grade III or higher

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment related Toxicitywithin 24 months after radiation treatmentassesment of toxicity according to CTCAE V5.0 in all three treatment groups
Treatment related Quality of lifewithin 24 months after radiation treatmentChanges in quality of life according to EORTC QLQ C-30
local Tumor Controlwithin 24 months after radiation treatmentChange of local Tumor size at one specific site
locoregional controlwithin 24 months after radiation treatmentChange of local Tumor size within a defined local region
distant tumor controlwithin 24 months after radiation treatmentapparence of distant Tumor leasions
progression-free survival (PFS)24 months after radiation treatmenttime of suvival without Tumor progression
overall survival (OS)24 months after radiation treatmenttime of Survival of studypopulation
Changes in applied biological effective doses (BED) to the target Volumen (Tumor)through study completion, an average of 1 yearBED increase and OAR doses with MRgSBRT compared to initial ITV-based planning in arms A and C
Evaluation of potential prognostic biomarkerswithin 24 months after radiation treatmentChanges in blood Levels of blood Parameters compared to reference samples

Countries

Germany

Contacts

CONTACTJakob Liermann, PD Dr
jakob.liermann@med.uni-heidelberg.de+496221 56

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026