Skip to content

The Impact of Social Phone Calls With Isolated Older Adults Receiving Protective Services for Abuse, Neglect and/or Exploitation

The Impact of Social Phone Calls With Isolated Older Adults Receiving Protective Services for Abuse, Neglect and/or Exploitation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05026762
Enrollment
13
Registered
2021-08-30
Start date
2021-06-15
Completion date
2021-11-01
Last updated
2021-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Senior Abuse

Keywords

depression, anxiety, loneliness, isolation, adult protective services

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to see the the impact of social visits, through weekly phones calls, on quality of life outcomes of depression, anxiety, loneliness, isolation and self-rated health for older adults visited by Adult Protective Services (APS) for abuse, neglect and/or exploitation (ANE) and to also to determine the benefit of these conversations on the medical student's perspective of aging and ANE.

Interventions

OTHERTreatment

Following the collection of the baseline data, the study participant will be assigned to a volunteer(medical student) to begin the social phone calls. The first phone call will be scheduled to occur within one week of the consent and baseline assessments. A minimum of one social phone call will occur each week for 6-weeks. Each phone call is expected to last up to 1 hour.The calls will be unstructured and designed simply to engage in conversation with the participant. The length of the phone calls, days and times will be recorded by the volunteer along with a short journal entry describing the conversation topics and any information that stood out to the volunteer.At the end of the 6-weeks phone calls, a group session will be held with the volunteers to engage in a debriefing and narrative medicine session.

Sponsors

UTHealth Consortium on Aging
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* recently visited by Texas Adult Protective Services for Abuse, Neglect and/or Exploitation * living in Harris County or a surrounding county serviced by APS District 6 * substantiated elder mistreatment (i.e. psychological abuse, financial exploitation, sexual abuse, neglect, physical abuse) and/or self neglect * provide a signed or verbal release agreeing to be contacted by the volunteers * able to provide verbal consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* significant cognitive impairment or incapacity as determined by their inability to complete the consent steps * Non-English-speaking

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Social isolation as assessed by the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) Social Isolation ScaleBaseline, 6 week follow upThis is a 4 item questionnaire and each question is scored from 1(never) to 5(always) a higher number indicating more isolation
Change in Anxiety as assessed by the Geriatric Anxiety ScaleBaseline, 6 week follow upThis is a 10 item questionnaire and each question is scored form 0(not at all) to 3(most of the time),a higher number indicating more anxiety
Change in Depression as assessed by the Geriatric Depression Scale Short FormBaseline, 6 week follow upThis is a 15 item questionnaire and each is answered either yes or no. One point is given for No to question 1, 5, 7, 11, 13 and one point for Yes to other questions. Normal ± 2 Mildly Depressed 7 ± 3 Very Depressed 12 ± 2
Change in Loneliness as assessed by the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA ) Loneliness ScaleBaseline, 6 week follow upA 20-item scale that measures the subjective experience of loneliness on a four-point Likert scale. Participants rate each item as either O (I often feel this way),S (I sometimes feel this way), R (I rarely feel this way), N (I never feel this way).
Change in perceived general health as assessed by the Self-Rated Health QuestionBaseline, 6 week follow upThe participant will rate their health as excellent, very good, good, fair or poor

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactGabrielle M Hoyumpa
Gabrielle.M.Hoyumpa@uth.tmc.edu210-867-0336
Backup ContactJason Burnett
Jason.Burnett@uth.tmc.edu(713) 500-3845

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026