Skip to content

The Effect of The Use of a Videolaryngoscope and/or Stylet on Intubation Time in Obese Patients

The Effect of The Use of a Videolaryngoscope and/or Stylet on Intubation Time in Obese Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05026671
Enrollment
120
Registered
2021-08-30
Start date
2021-09-01
Completion date
2022-04-30
Last updated
2022-11-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation Time

Keywords

Obese Patients, Stylet Procedures, Video Laryngoscope, First-attempt intubation

Brief summary

Although many researchers would agree that obesity per se is not a risk factor for difficult intubation, there are many well known obesity-related challenges in airway management including difficulty with mask ventilation, more frequent and rapid oxygen desaturation, increased oxygen consumption, and increased sensitivity to the respiratory depressant effects of anesthetic and analgesic drugs. Hence, in these conditions, rapid and nontraumatic intubation gain higher interest. There is controversy about using videoaryngoscopy (VL) in obese patients in these difficult situations. The primary aim of this study is to compare, in terms of intubation time, VL,VL plus stylet and direct-laryngoscopy(DL) plus stylet combination with DL alone in obese patients.

Detailed description

Patients who will be scheduled for surgeries requiring endotracheal intubation, with a body mass index (BMI) more than 30 kg/m2, will be included to this study. During preanesthetic visit (performed by an anesthesiologist not involved in this study) history of difficult intubation, measurement of common predictive indices for difficult intubation (BMI, thyromental distance, neck circumference, Mallampati grade, interincisal \[or intergingival\] distances), and evaluation of status of dentition and neck movement will be noted. In the operating room, all patients will be connected to standard monitoring devices. Anesthesia induction will be carried out according to our hospital obese patient anesthesia management protocol. Then, after induction of anesthesia, the patients will be intubated one of four pre-defined protocols that will be determined via randomization during a preanesthetic visit by a person who is unfamiliar with the research protocol. Primary hypothesis of this study is; using a video-laryngoscope plus stylet will reduce the time required to achieve successful tracheal intubation in obese patients.

Interventions

Intubating the trachea with an endotracheal tube alone ( without stylet).

PROCEDUREEndotracheal Tube+ Stylet

Intubating the trachea with an endotracheal tube + stylet.

PROCEDUREEndotracheal Tube + Video-laryngoscope

Intubating the trachea with an endotracheal tube + Video- laryngoscope

PROCEDUREEndotracheal tube + stylet with Video-laryngoscope

Intubating the trachea with an endotracheal tube + stylet + Video-laryngoscope

Sponsors

Karaman Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participant and the healthcare worker who will perform preoperative and postoperative visit will be blinded to randomized study group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with a documented body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 30. * Patients scheduled to undergo inpatient surgery procedures under general anesthesia. * Willingness and ability to sign an informed consent document 18 - 80 years of age

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who are deemed to be such a significant of an airway risk that they necessitate awake fiberoptic intubation * Patients with a history of facial abnormalities, oral-pharyngeal cancer, or reconstructive surgery * Emergency surgeries * Pregnancy * Any other conditions or use of any medication which may interfere with the conduct of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intubation Time Using a Stop WatchUp to 3 minutesThe timing measurements will begin once the laryngoscope blade will be placed in the patient's mouth and ended when an end-tidal CO2 tracing will be detected.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Heart RateBefore induction to 3 min after intubationBefore induction, after induction, after intubation, after intubation at 1st minute, 2nd minute, and 3rd minute
Mean Arterial Pressure:Before induction to 3 min after intubationBefore induction, after induction, after intubation, after intubation at 1st minute, 2nd minute, and 3rd minute
SaturationBefore induction to 3 min after intubationBefore induction, after induction, after intubation, after intubation at 1st minute, 2nd minute, and 3rd minute
Incidence of severe complications following intubationDuring intubation to 3 min after intubationHypoxia, collapse, cardiac arrest, death.
Glottis View Using the Cormack Lehane ScoreUp to 1 minuteCormack Lehane score classification Grade 1: Most of the glottis is visible Grade 2: At best almost half of the glottis is seen, at worst only the posterior tip of the arytenoids is seen Grade 3: Only the epiglottis is visible Grade 4: No laryngeal structures are visible
Number of intubation attemptsUp to postinduction 120 secondAn intubation attempt will be defined as the insertion of the laryngoscope blade into the mouth of the patient, regardless of whether an attempt will be made to insert a tracheal tube. More than 5 attempts or 120 s will be regarded as a failure of intubation.
Ease of IntubationUp to 1 minuteSubjective evaluation of the anesthesiologist, rated as (1) very easy, (2) easy, (3) moderate, (4) difficult, and (5) impossible.
Complications related to intubationpostoperative 4th hourA postoperative follow-up assessment will be performed approximately 4 hr after surgery by a co-investigator blinded to the intubation device to evaluate the presence and severity of sore throat, any changes in voice, trauma to the lip, tongue, gum, or teeth.
Glottis View Using the POGO ScoreUp to 1 minutethe POGO score evaluate the glottic view during tracheal intubation using a classification of 1/2/3/4 and a score of 0% to 100%, respectively. The POGO score denote visualization of the entire glottic opening from the anterior commissure to the posterior cartilages, and a score of 0% denotes inability to visualize any part of the glottic opening.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026