Skip to content

Correlation of the Non-invasive Cardiopulmonary Management (CPM) Wearable Device With Measures of Congestion in Heart Failure

Correlation of the Non-invasive Cardiopulmonary Management (CPM) Wearable Device With Measures of Congestion in Heart Failure

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05026034
Acronym
CONGEST HF
Enrollment
72
Registered
2021-08-30
Start date
2021-09-23
Completion date
2022-07-22
Last updated
2023-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Brief summary

Fluid status and congestion can be determined by the CPM wearable device and correlates with invasive measures, non-invasive measures and biochemical markers of congestion and changes in congestion.

Detailed description

HF is associated with frequent and lengthy hospitalisations. These hospitalisations are usually as a result of congestion. The signs of congestion that can be recognised by physicians or health care professionals such as lung crackles or worsening of peripheral oedema are often seen at a late stage before an intervention can be made to prevent overt decompensation and admission to hospital. Recognising changes in excess fluid status either before a patient becomes unwell or during decongestion treatment is highly desirable so that timely treatment can be started or so that treatment can be adjusted based on an individual's response to therapy. The ability to assess patients by applying a single, non-invasive device would potentially provide a useful tool for assessing a patient's congestion levels and allow patients with progressive deterioration to be identified earlier.

Interventions

DEVICEnon-invasive Cardiopulmonary Management (CPM) wearable device

non-invasive Cardiopulmonary Management (CPM) wearable device with measures of congestion in heart failure

Sponsors

University of Glasgow
CollaboratorOTHER
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Written informed consent * Male or female over18 years of age Cohort A * Meet European Society of Cardiology 1 (ESC) criteria for diagnosis of HF * Undergoing clinically-indicated RHC Cohort B * Established on haemodialysis for \>90 days * Undergoing haemodialysis with target volume removal ≥1.5 litres fluid Cohort C * Meet ESC criteria for diagnosis of HF including heart failure * Requiring treatment with intravenous (IV) diuretics Training Cohort * Meet ESC criteria for diagnosis of HF including heart failure * Requiring treatment with intravenous (IV) diuretics

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to consent to inclusion in study due to cognitive impairment * Allergies or skin sensitivities to silicone-based adhesive * Skin breakdown or dermatological condition on the left chest or breast areas or chest wall deformity where the device is placed * Pregnancy or breast-feeding * Conditions that may confound congestion assessments * COVID-19 infection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cohort A: determine the correlation between congestion measured by the CPM wearable device and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure3 monthsCohort A: determine the correlation between congestion measured by the CPM wearable device and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure measured in mmHg
Cohort C: To determine the correlation between congestion and change in congestion measured by the CPM wearable device and lung ultrasound (LUS)24 hoursCohort C: To determine the correlation between congestion and change in congestion measured by the CPM wearable device and lung ultrasound (LUS) measured as change in number of B lines
Cohort C: To determine the correlation between congestion and change in congestion measured by the CPM wearable device and clinical measures of congestion24 hoursCohort C: To determine the correlation between congestion and change in congestion measured by the CPM wearable device and change in weight (kg)
Cohort B: To determine the correlation between congestion and change in congestion measured by the CPM wearable device and lung ultrasound (LUS)4 hoursCohort B: To determine the correlation between congestion and change in congestion measured by the CPM wearable device and lung ultrasound (LUS) measured as change in number of B lines

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cohort C: To determine the correlation between pulmonary function measured by the CPM wearable device and spirometry24 hoursCohort C: To determine the correlation between pulmonary function measured by the CPM wearable device and spirometry measured by tidal volumes (ml/kg)
Cohort A: To determine the correlation between pulmonary function measured by the CPM wearable device and spirometry24 hoursCohort A: To determine the correlation between pulmonary function measured by the CPM wearable device and spirometry measured by tidal volumes (ml/kg)
Cohort B: To determine the correlation between pulmonary function measured by the CPM wearable device and spirometry24 hoursCohort B: To determine the correlation between pulmonary function measured by the CPM wearable device and spirometry measured by tidal volumes (ml/kg)
Cohort A: To determine the correlation between congestion measured by the CPM wearable device and the Everest clinical congestions score3 monthsCohort A: To determine the correlation between congestion measured by the CPM wearable device and the Everest clinical congestions score grading 0 to 3 (with 0 being absent or a trace)
Cohort B: To determine the correlation between congestion measured by the CPM wearable device and the Everest clinical congestions score4 hoursCohort B: To determine the correlation between congestion measured by the CPM wearable device and the Everest clinical congestions score grading 0 to 3 (with 0 being absent or a trace)
Cohort C: To determine the correlation between congestion measured by the CPM wearable device and the Everest clinical congestions score24 hoursCohort C: To determine the correlation between congestion measured by the CPM wearable device and the Everest clinical congestions score grading 0 to 3 (with 0 being absent or a trace)
Cohort A: To determine the correlation between congestion measured by the CPM wearable device and right heart catheter (RHC) measurements3 monthsCohort A: To determine the correlation between congestion measured by the CPM wearable device and right heart catheter (RHC) measurements
Cohort A: To determine the correlation between congestion measured by the CPM wearable device and echocardiography3 monthsCohort A: To determine the correlation between congestion measured by the CPM wearable device and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured as a percentrage by echocardiography
Cohort B: To determine the correlation between congestion measured by the CPM wearable device and echocardiography4 hoursCohort B: To determine the correlation between congestion measured by the CPM wearable device and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured as a percentrage by echocardiography
Cohort C: To determine the correlation between congestion measured by the CPM wearable device and echocardiography24 hoursCohort C: To determine the correlation between congestion measured by the CPM wearable device and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured as a percentrage by echocardiography

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cohort C: Correlation coefficient between congestion score measured by CPM wearable device and Change in haematocrit (Hct)24 hoursCohort C: Correlation coefficient between congestion score measured by CPM wearable device and Change in haematocrit (Hct) measured in L/L
Cohort C: Correlation coefficient between congestion score measured by CPM wearable device and left ventricular strain3 monthsCohort C: Correlation coefficient between congestion score measured by CPM wearable device and left ventricular strain measured in percentage by echocardiography
Cohort C: Correlation coefficient between congestion score measured by CPM wearable device and right ventricular strain4 hoursCohort C: Correlation coefficient between congestion score measured by CPM wearable device and right ventricular strain measured in percentage by echocardiography
Cohort C: Correlation coefficient between congestion score measured by CPM wearable device and left atrial strain24 hoursCohort C: Correlation coefficient between congestion score measured by CPM wearable device and left atrial strain measured in percentage by echocardiography
Cohort B: Correlation coefficient between congestion score measured by CPM wearable device and NTproBNP4 hoursCohort B: Correlation coefficient between congestion score measured by CPM wearable device and NTproBNP measured in pg/ml
Cohort B: Correlation coefficient between congestion score measured by CPM wearable device and change in haematocrit (Hct)4 hoursCohort B: Correlation coefficient between congestion score measured by CPM wearable device and change in haematocrit (Hct) measured in L/L
Cohort A: Correlation coefficient between congestion score measured by CPM wearable device and NTproBNP3 monthsCohort A: Correlation coefficient between congestion score measured by CPM wearable device and NTproBNP measured in pg/ml
Cohort A: Correlation coefficient between congestion score measured by CPM wearable device and change in haematocrit (Hct)3 monthsCohort A: Correlation coefficient between congestion score measured by CPM wearable device and change in haematocrit (Hct) measured in L/L
Cohort C: Correlation coefficient between congestion score measured by CPM wearable device and NTproBNP24 hoursCohort C: Correlation coefficient between congestion score measured by CPM wearable device and NTproBNP measured in pg/ml

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026