Latent Tuberculosis
Conditions
Keywords
Video Directly Observed Therapy
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate a novel and scalable intervention that combines Video Directly Observed Therapy (vDOT) and financial incentives to promote completion of treatment for latent tuberculosis. Adult participants who are initiating treatment for latent tuberculosis will be recruited from the Baltimore City Health Department. The primary hypothesis is that the incentive intervention will increase the percentage of participants that complete the treatment for latent tuberculosis above the completion rates of participants receiving usual care.
Detailed description
Identifying and treating individuals with latent tuberculosis (TB) (LTBI) is a key strategy to achieve the goal of TB elimination in the US but there are many challenges to achieving this goal. In Baltimore, where this research will be conducted, prior studies suggest 35% of non-US--born individuals may have latent TB. Individuals experiencing homelessness have also been found to be at higher risk for TB infection. However, socioeconomic factors such as poverty, access to care, health literacy, and language or cultural barriers present obstacles to treatment. Treatment for latent TB is rarely a priority for patients with many other competing needs. The length of treatment spans many months, and preliminary data shows that less than half will complete prescribed treatment. To date there are limited interventions shown to be effective in increasing adherence to LTBI therapy. Directly observed therapy (DOT) administered via video (Video-DOT, with case-management) has been shown to be effective at monitoring treatment in active TB, but there is limited data when applied to LTBI. Interventions that provide incentives to patients when they meet required therapeutic goals have been demonstrated extraordinarily effective in promoting therapeutic behavior change in diverse populations. The goal of this randomized trial is to evaluate two adherence interventions ( Video DOT or Video DOT plus financial incentives) versus Usual Care to promote completion of treatment for latent TB among those found eligible and are prescribed short course therapy (isoniazid+Rifampin(3HR), Isoniazid+rifapentine(3HP), or Rifampin alone(4R)) for LTBI care. The primary assessment of adherence will be treatment completion which is defined as taking 80% of the prescribed doses of medication, as determined by Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) caps (i.e., 10 of 12 doses for participants prescribed weekly doses of rifapentine and isoniazid; 96 of 120 doses for participants prescribed daily doses of rifampin; 67 of 84 doses of daily isoniazid and rifampin Video directly observed therapy (video-DOT) will use the Electronic Mobile Comprehensive Health Application (emocha) platform. This system provides a HIPAA compliant approach for remote DOT combined with data collection that optimizes TB case management. The Video DOT system is comprised of a smart phone/tablet application used by patients, and a web-based dashboard used by the TB clinic. The patient-side application (app) reminds patients to take their medications on a schedule specified by the clinician. For those randomized to the Video-DOT plus incentives arm, additional financial incentives (provided in real-time) are delivered contingent on verification of medication ingestion by video observation.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALUsual Care
Medication is dispensed to participant at each visit in 30-60 day supplies by Baltimore City Health Department (BCHD) nurses. For study participants, medication dispensation will occur in medication bottles with MEMS Caps, supplied by the study.
BEHAVIORALVideo Directly Observed Therapy alone
Usual care plus Video-DOT using the emocha platform, a HIPAA compliant commercial platform for video based DOT. The app allows a secure/encrypted video recording to be taken as the participant ingests the medication. Electronic text reminders will be sent to the participant on the smart phone when it is time to take the medication. The participant will record a video of the pill ingestion process. Study staff will verify each video to confirm the video shows the correct person and that the pill was ingested appropriately (according to standardized approach involving visualization of the pills, ingestion and observation of an empty mouth after ingestion).
BEHAVIORALVideo Directly Observed Therapy plus Financial Incentives
Usual care plus video-DOT and financial incentives contingent on adherence verified by video DOT. The amount of the financial incentive that can be earned for future verified doses decreases after a missed dose (video). The amount of the financial incentives increases incrementally back to baseline amount after verification of medication ingestion according to the prescribed schedule for several consecutive doses.
Sponsors
Johns Hopkins University
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* 18 years old or older, * diagnosed with latent TB and determined to be appropriate for latent TB treatment by participants clinicians * reside in Baltimore metro area * speaks English or Spanish, or a language for which there is a short form available via the Johns Hopkins Medicine Institutional Review Board * prescribed 3 months Isoniazid/Rifapentine, prescribed 3 months Isoniazid/Rifampin, or 4 months Rifampin
Exclusion criteria
* younger than 18 years old * diagnosed with active TB * prescribed an alternative treatment regimen for latent TB * pregnant women (as determined by non-study directed clinical evaluation; BCHD performs urine pregnancy testing on women of child bearing age when indicated) * participant's spoken language does not have a translated long or short consent form
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Completion | Up to 6 months | The primary outcome measure, completion of treatment for latent TB, will be assessed for all participants through MEMS caps. A participant will be considered to have completed treatment for study purposes if he/she takes 80% of the prescribed doses of medication, as determined by MEMS caps (i.e., 10 of 12 doses for participants prescribed weekly doses of rifapentine and isoniazid; 96 of 120 doses for participants prescribed daily doses of rifampin; 67 of 84 doses of daily isoniazid and rifampin |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adherence measurements | Up to 6 months | We will assess how well adherence measured by video based observation of therapy correspond to MEMS caps data in the Intervention arm |
| Treatment completion (alternative definition) | Up to 6 months | We will assess treatment completion using video observed therapy (video verification of ingestion) as an alternative measure of adherence in the intervention arms (i.e. comparing completion between video DOT arm, (80% of prescribed doses taken, and defined by accepted videos\] and Usual care \[80% of prescribed doses taken measured by MEMS caps\]) |
| Costs of the incentive intervention | 5 years | Assess the costs of the incentive intervention. To estimate the costs of the interventions and standard of care, we will utilize an ingredients approach (i.e. micro-costing) in which costs are determined based on unit prices and quantities used. The costs of administering the different components of video-DOT and the Incentives Interventions, and the Usual Care will be based on a combination of direct observations, project records, and clinic invoices. |
| Cost-effectiveness of the incentive intervention | 5 years | We will utilize a decision-analytic model to evaluate and report the cost-effectiveness of the intervention, reported as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio comparing the interventions to usual care, measured against currently accepted willingness to pay thresholds |
Countries
United States
Contacts
CONTACTPrincipal Investigator
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMaunank Shah, MD, PhD
Johns Hopkins University
Outcome results
None listed