Skip to content

Cardiac Autonomic Nerve Improvement and Pacemaker Therapy in Patients With Sinus Bradycardia

A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study of Cardiac Autonomic Nerve Improvement and Pacemaker Therapy in Patients With Sinus Bradycardia

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05021627
Enrollment
240
Registered
2021-08-25
Start date
2021-09-01
Completion date
2026-08-31
Last updated
2021-08-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sinus Bradycardia

Brief summary

This is a multicenter randomized controlled study. By comparing patients with sinus bradycardia undergoing cardiac autonomic ganglion ablation and pacemaker therapy, and long-term follow-up to evaluate its safety and effectiveness after surgery, in order to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cardiac autonomic ganglion ablation in the treatment of sinus bradycardia.

Interventions

PROCEDURECardiac autonomic nerve modification

Patients with sinus bradycardia undergoing cardiac autonomic ganglion ablation. Specific anatomic ablation of the 4 major left atrial GP and aorta-superior vena cava (Ao-SVC) GP was performed. Briefly, catheter ablation was performed under the guidance of an electroanatomic mapping system (CARTO,BiosenseWebster,DiamondBar,California). After completed the electroanatomic mapping of the left atrium was complete and pulmonary vein (PV) ostia identified, presumed GP clusters were ablated 1 to 2cm outside the PV-left atrium junctions at the following sites: the left superolateral area (leftsuperior GP\[LSGP\]), the leftinfer oposterior area(left inferior GP\[LIGP\]), the right superoanterior area (rightanterior GP\[RAGP\]), the right inferoposterior area(right inferior GP\[RIGP\]), and the Ao-SVC fat pad (Ao-SVCGP), and in that sequence.

PROCEDUREPacemaker implantation

Patients with sinus bradycardia received pacemaker implantation. The patient lay flat on the bed, puncture the subclavian vein and insert two guide wires. Cut the skin under the guide wire to make a skin bag, and stop bleeding accurately to avoid continuous bleeding of the skin bag. The pacemaker electrode is inserted into the heart cavity by guiding the guide wire, one is placed in the ventricle and the other in the atrium, and the corresponding parameters of the electrode, such as pacing threshold, impedance, etc., are measured at the same time. If the parameters are good, fix the electrode, connect the electrode with the pacemaker, place the pacemaker in the skin bag, fix the pacemaker and electrode, suture the skin layer by layer, and the operation is completed.

Sponsors

Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
The Second People's Hospital of Yuhuan City
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Shanghai Chest Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged 18 to 80 years old; 2. Symptomatic sinus bradycardia; 3. Not meet the class I indications for pacemaker implantation.

Exclusion criteria

1. Structural heart disease, heart surgery history; 2. Drug-induced SB, sinus pause \>2.0 s, positive atropine test, corrected sinus node recovery time (cSNRT) \>525 ms; 3. Any atrial or ventricular arrhythmia, or a history of ablation procedures to treat atrial tachyarrhythmias; 4. With Significant congenital heart disease, ejection fraction was \<40% measured by echocardiography; 5. Allergic to contrast media; 6. Contraindication to anticoagulation medications; 7. Severe pulmonary disease e.g. restrictive pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive disease (COPD); 9\. Poor general health; 10.Life expectancy less than 6 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Symptom score after operation48 monthsEach patient subjectively assessed his or her SB-related symptom, including dizziness, fatigue, and palpitation, on a score of 1 to 10 points (mildtosevere). The total SB-related symptom score for each patient was calculated as the sum of all scores for individual symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life score48 monthsThe Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) was used to assess quality of life (QoL) at baseline and 12 months after ablation. The self-administration mode was strictly followed for QoL surveys. TheSF-36 assesses 8 specific QoL domains, namely physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problem, and mental health. For each subscale, scores were transformed to a scale ranging from 0 to 100, with lower scores representing a lower QoL.
Psychological quality score48 monthsThe Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale is a short self administered survey to quantify the depressed status of a patient. There are 20 items on the scale that rate the four common characteristics of depression: the pervasive effect, the physiological equivalents, other disturbances, and psychomotor activities. There are ten positively worded and ten negatively worded questions. Each question is scored on a scale of 1-4 (a little of the time, some of the time, good part of the time, most of the time).

Contacts

Primary ContactXu Liu, MD
heartlx@sina.com+8613052320103

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026