Skip to content

Effects of Core Stabilization Training With and Without Pressure Biofeedback in Patients With Low Back Pain

Effects of Core Stabilization Training With and Without Pressure Biofeedback in Patients With Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05021003
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-08-25
Start date
2021-08-05
Completion date
2022-03-30
Last updated
2022-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

Pain, Back, Core stabilization, Pressure biofeedback

Brief summary

Mechanical low back pain is an impairment of musculoskeletal system. Lifetime prevalence of low back pain is 60-85%. Frequent micro-trauma to the structures of the spine, poor control and stabilization leads to LBP and eventually causes functional limitation. The objective of the study to find whether Core Stabilization Training with Pressure Biofeedback could reduce pain and improves functional activity in patients with mechanical low back pain. To study the effectiveness of Core Stabilization Training with Pressure Biofeedback in reducing pain and improving functional activity in subjects with mechanical low backpain between the age group of 25-40 years. To find out the effect of core stabilization training with pressure biofeedback in reducing pain and improving functional activity in subjects with mechanical low back pain between the age group of 25-40 years. The study will be conducted on 30 subjects between the age group of 25-40 years with mechanical low back pain and according to the inclusion criteria were recruited in the study. NPRS at rest and activity, Modified ODI will assess PRE and POST treatment. P value: less than 0.05 using SPSS (Statistical package for social sciences) for NPRS(pain at rest and activity) and modified ODI i.e. core stabilization training with pressure biofeedback had statistical improvement in NPRS (Pain at rest and activity) and modified ODI score. Core stabilization training with pressure biofeedback is effective inreducing pain (at rest and activity) and functional disability in subjects between the age group of 25-40 years with mechanical low back pain

Interventions

: Core stabilization training with pressure biofeedback unit

OTHERcore stabilization exercises

: Core stabilization training without pressure biofeedback unit

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\\ * Male and female patients between the age group 25-40 years having mechanical low back pain persisting for at least 6 months upto1 year. * Patients complaining Pain when sitting or standing for a long period or Pain when driving long distance, getting in and out of the car or lifting activities. * Patients with minimum and moderate disability based on Modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). * Patients with greater than and equal to 7 score on NPRS.

Exclusion criteria

* Structural deformity (scoliosis, lordosis). * Systematic inflammatory disease (vasculitis, connective tissue disease and granulomatous disease). * Nerve root compression (Disc bulge and Lumbar radiculopathy). * History of spinal surgery or fractures (laminectomy).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
NPRS4 weeksIn a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), patients are asked to circle the number between 0 and 10, 0 and 20 or 0 and 100 that fits best to their pain intensity \[1\]. Zero usually represents 'no pain at all' whereas the upper limit represents 'the worst pain ever possible
oswestry disability index4 weeksEach section is scored on a 0-5 scale, 5 representing the greatest disability. The index is calculated by dividing the summed score by the total possible score, which is then multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage. Thus, for every question not answered, the denominator is reduced by 5.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026