Down Syndrome
Conditions
Keywords
Early Childhood, Health Promotion, Nutrition, Sleep, Physical Activity
Brief summary
This study will examine the feasibility of the Promoting Health through Parent Empowerment and the Activation of Routines (Pro-PEAR) intervention using a open case-series for intervention optimization followed by a pilot RCT in which participants are randomized to receive Pro-PEAR or enhanced usual care (EUC). Specific aims include: 1. Optimize the Pro-PEAR intervention manual using an open case series with iterative stakeholder feedback. 2. To determine the feasibility of the Pro-PEAR intervention in terms of recruitment, randomization, retention, adherence, and acceptability. 3. Estimate the effects of the Pro-PEAR intervention on parent reported child health behaviors in each Institute of Medicine obesity prevention area (nutrition, physical activity, sedentary behavior, sleep) over time as compared to a control group. The following benchmarks will be used to determine feasibility: Recruitment: \>3 parent/child dyads per month Retention: \>75% of consented dyads will complete \> 8 sessions Adherence: \>80% clinician protocol adherence during 100% of sampled sessions Data Collection: \>80% planned assessments collected among intervention completers. Acceptability: \>90% of parent intervention completers rate intervention as acceptable. Additionally, it is predicted that parents will report greater gains in the areas of nutrition, sleep, sedentary behavior and physical activity in the Pro-PEAR group than those in the control group.
Detailed description
Interested participants will contact the research team and screening to determine eligibility may be confirmed in person or over the phone. Interested parent participants will undergo the consent process with a trained research assistant and/or the principal investigator. Families will be sent the informed consent documents prior to informed consent process. Prior to data collection, a member of the research team will use a script to discuss the risks and activities involved in study participation and answer any questions the participant has about the study. Following signed informed consent, an appointment will be scheduled for baseline assessments. Child participants will be provided with the wrist-worn actigraphy device and thigh-worn Physical Activities Logging (activPAL) device, and parents/caregivers educated on the wear schedule and periodic skin checks to ensure skin integrity. Parents will be instructed to complete skin checks daily to minimize risk of abrasions and to contact the study team immediately if any issues occur. The child will wear these devices to collect data on activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep for 7 full days. It is anticipated that each assessment appointment will last approximately 2 hours. If conducted remotely, devices and other materials will be mailed to the participant and completed with a member of the research team on the phone or video conference to answer any question. Equipment will be collected at the time of the first in- person intervention session or by placing in a pre-paid postage box (provided by research team) and placing in the mail. After assessments, the first approximately ten families will receive the Pro-PEAR intervention from Caldwell (PI) over 12 sessions in their home. Every other week (weeks: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11) parents will be coached on a new health promoting topic: family meals, healthy portions, bedtime routines, strategies for screens, moving and grooving, and health promoting play. Each of these sessions will last approximately 30 minutes and may be delivered in person or remotely (using Zoom). During the alternate weeks (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12) therapists will check in with families and address any issues or barriers (such as child behavior) that has impacted progress toward building healthy habits. Each of these sessions will last approximately 30 minutes and be delivered remotely via Zoom. Data collected from these first \ 10 families will inform intervention optimization and finalization of the manual of procedures for the pilot RCT. Once the manual is finalized, 24 additional families will be recruited and randomized (2:1) to receive either Pro-PEAR or a control (enhanced usual care). Families assigned to Pro-PEAR will receive intervention as described above with minor modification as informed by the first 10 participants. Pro-PEAR will be delivered by trained occupational therapy clinicians. Families assigned to control will receive enhanced usual care. Enhanced usual care will include information about child habits in the areas of healthy eating, physical activity, sedentary behavior and sleep based on parent questionnaires and actigraphy. For both the Pro-PEAR and the control group, usual care will be documented through questions about receipt of services and semi-structured interviews with parents. Parent Experience: All research activities will take place in the participants' homes. Parents will be expected to complete assessment and intervention activities in the comfort of their home with the research team joining in-person or virtually as needed/preferred. They may refuse to participate in any portion of the research study at any time and will be encouraged to be an active collaborator throughout all actives. Child Experience: Children will be expected to wear the Phillips Actiwatch on their wrist and the activPAL on their thigh for 1 week at each assessment timepoint. Children will be expected to participate in activities initiated by their parents and clinicians as appropriate throughout all phases of research. Based on prior studies within the lab, it is anticipated that \>75% of participants will complete the 3-month program and 6 month follow-up (\>18/24). A sample size of 24 in the pilot RCT will provide us with the \>12 PrO-PEAR intervention completers needed to estimate average outcome values and variability to plan larger subsequent trials. Descriptive statistics will be used to determine whether feasibility benchmarks have been met for each group. Between group differences and differences in primary outcomes over time will be analyzed using linear mixed models with fixed and random effects.
Interventions
Parents will receive a report of their child's current performance and adherence to World Health Organization recommendations in each intervention area. Parents will be coached to build consistent family mealtime routines, in which children are involved in meal preparation, food exploration, and play. They will receive education on appropriate serving sizes for young children and basic information nutrition recommendations. Predictable bedtime routines will be designed to incorporate calming sensory input to improve the transition to bed. Parents will be educated on screen time recommendations and help families brainstorm alternatives to screens, including family-based routines of movement and activity. Finally, parents will be coached to incorporate play into all newly adopted routines, as young children learn though play.
For the control group, usual care will be enhanced by providing parents with a report of their child's performance and adherence to World Health Organization recommendations in the areas of healthy eating, physical activity, sedentary behavior and sleep. This report will consolidate data based on parent report, written logs, and actigraphy at baseline.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Research assistants collecting outcome measures will be blinded to study assignment.
Intervention model description
Pilot RCT will follow a 2:1 randomization scheme with 2 participant families (parent + child) assigned to intervention (Pro-PEAR) for every 1 assigned to control (enhanced usual care) for a total of 24 participant families.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Child Inclusion Criteria: 1. between the ages of 12 and 36 months 2. diagnosis of Down syndrome 3. demonstrate independent mobility (e.g., walking, crawling) Child
Exclusion criteria
1. mobility is significantly restricted because of a medical condition, or 2. nutrition is received primarily by feeding tube. Parent Inclusion Criteria 1\) aged \> 18 years Parent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Pro-PEAR Intervention Sessions Completed | 3 months | As measured using interventionist documentation |
| Parent-reported Intervention Acceptability as Rated on a Likert Scale. | 3 months | Participant acceptability ratings of the PrO-PEAR intervention using the Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire. Scores range from 8 to 48 with higher scores indicating higher acceptability. |
| Percentage of Planned Data Collection Efforts Completed Successfully | 6 months | Measured by the number of outcomes collected divided by the number of planned outcomes |
| Number of Participant Families Recruited Per Month | up to 1 year | Quantified for each month of active recruitment and averaged |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Sedentary Behavior From Baseline to 3 Months | baseline to 3 months | change in # of minutes spent in bouts of sedentary behavior \>60 minutes, on average, each day as measured by activPAL (Physical Activities Logging) |
| Change in Sedentary Behavior From Baseline to 6 Months | baseline to 6 months | change in # minutes of bouts of sedentary behavior \>60 minutes, on average, each day as measured by activPAL |
| Change in Sleep Duration From Baseline to 3 Months | baseline to 3 months | change in # minutes of child sleep, on average, each night as measured by the Phillips Actiwatch |
| Change in Sleep Duration From Baseline to 6 Months | baseline to 6 months | change in # minutes of child sleep, on average, each night as measured by the Phillips Actiwatch |
| Change in Healthy Eating From Baseline to 3 Months | baseline to 3 months | change in # of fruits & vegetables children consumed, on average, each day as measured by parent report and the EAT FFQ (Eating Assessment in Toddlers Food Frequency Questionnaire). Average number of portions of fruits and vegetables were reported on two questions of a Food Frequency Questionnaire with options ranging from 0-4 servings of fruits and 0-4 servings of vegetables. These scores were added together at each time point with greater scores indicating greater consumption of fruits and vegetables. |
| Change in Child Height From Baseline to 6 Months | baseline to 6 months | Child weight will be assessed using chart review and scale |
| Change in Child Weight From Baseline to 1 Year | 1 year | Child weight will be assessed using chart review. |
| Change in Child Height From Baseline to 1 Year | one year | Child height will be assessed using chart review. |
| Change in Child Weight From Baseline to 6 Months | baseline to 6 months | Child weight will be assessed using chart review and scale |
| Change in Healthy Eating From Baseline to 6 Months | baseline to 6 months | change in # of fruits & vegetables children consumed, on average, each day as measured by parent report and the EAT FFQ (Eating Assessment in Toddlers Food Frequency Questionnaire). Average number of portions of fruits and vegetables were reported on two questions of a Food Frequency Questionnaire with options ranging from 0-4 servings of fruits and 0-4 servings of vegetables. These scores were added together at each time point with greater scores indicating greater consumption of fruits and vegetables. |
| Change in Physical Activity From Baseline to 3 Months | baseline to 3 months | change in # of hours of light, moderate, or vigorous child physical activity, on average, each day as measured by activPAL |
| Change in Physical Activity From Baseline to 6 Months | baseline to 6 months | change in # of hours of light, moderate, or vigorous child physical activity, on average, each day as measured by activPAL |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Protocol Enrollment reflects the number of individual children and parents enrolled \[40\], but data are reported in the Results Section per family unit \[20\], except where otherwise noted \[Adverse Events\].
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Pro-PEAR This group will receive the optimized Pro-PEAR intervention (in addition to usual care).
Parents will receive a report of their child's current performance and adherence to World Health Organization recommendations in each intervention area. Parents will be coached to build consistent family mealtime routines, in which children are involved in meal preparation, food exploration, and play. They will receive education on appropriate serving sizes for young children and basic information nutrition recommendations. Predictable bedtime routines will be designed to incorporate calming sensory input to improve the transition to bed. Parents will be educated on screen time recommendations and help families brainstorm alternatives to screens, including family-based routines of movement and activity. Finally, parents will be coached to incorporate play into all newly adopted routines, as young children learn though play. | 15 |
| Enhanced Usual Care This group will serve as the control group and only receive a report of their child's performance and adherence to World Health Organization recommendations based on baseline data.
Enhanced Usual Care: For the control group, usual care will be enhanced by providing parents with a report of their child's performance and adherence to World Health Organization recommendations in the areas of healthy eating, physical activity, sedentary behavior and sleep. This report will consolidate data based on parent report, written logs, and actigraphy at baseline. | 5 |
| Total | 20 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 2 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Pro-PEAR | Enhanced Usual Care | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 35.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7 | 34.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6 | 35.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Child Participants Hispanic or Latino | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Child Participants Not Hispanic or Latino | 13 Participants | 4 Participants | 17 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Child Participants Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Parent Participants Hispanic or Latino | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Parent Participants Not Hispanic or Latino | 14 Participants | 4 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Parent Participants Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Child Participants American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Child Participants Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Child Participants Black or African American | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Child Participants More than one race | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Child Participants Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Child Participants Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Child Participants White | 9 Participants | 5 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Parent Participants American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Parent Participants Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Parent Participants Black or African American | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Parent Participants More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Parent Participants Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Parent Participants Unknown or Not Reported | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Parent Participants White | 12 Participants | 5 Participants | 17 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Child Participants Female | 6 Participants | 2 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Child Participants Male | 9 Participants | 3 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Parent Participants Female | 14 Participants | 5 Participants | 19 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Parent Participants Male | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 30 | 0 / 10 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 1 / 30 | 0 / 10 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 30 | 0 / 10 |
Outcome results
Number of Participant Families Recruited Per Month
Quantified for each month of active recruitment and averaged
Time frame: up to 1 year
Population: Participant families were randomized to groups after recruitment - we report this data based on family units.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Pro-PEAR | Number of Participant Families Recruited Per Month | 5.25 participant families per month |
Number of Pro-PEAR Intervention Sessions Completed
As measured using interventionist documentation
Time frame: 3 months
Population: In this analysis, we only included participants (both children and parents) who attended at least 1 intervention session (e.g., not those lost to follow-up prior to intervention and not those in the control group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-PEAR | Number of Pro-PEAR Intervention Sessions Completed | 9.1 # of sessions completed | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
Parent-reported Intervention Acceptability as Rated on a Likert Scale.
Participant acceptability ratings of the PrO-PEAR intervention using the Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire. Scores range from 8 to 48 with higher scores indicating higher acceptability.
Time frame: 3 months
Population: The TAQ was sent separately only to parent participants who received the intervention. Not all parent participants who received this web-based survey completed it.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-PEAR | Parent-reported Intervention Acceptability as Rated on a Likert Scale. | 38.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.8 |
Percentage of Planned Data Collection Efforts Completed Successfully
Measured by the number of outcomes collected divided by the number of planned outcomes
Time frame: 6 months
Population: We calculated the number of outcomes collected across participants in the intervention and control groups and calculated percentage of assessments collected.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Pro-PEAR | Percentage of Planned Data Collection Efforts Completed Successfully | 80 percentage of assessments collected |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Percentage of Planned Data Collection Efforts Completed Successfully | 94 percentage of assessments collected |
Change in Child Height From Baseline to 1 Year
Child height will be assessed using chart review.
Time frame: one year
Population: We were unable to collect height at one year because we were not able to gain access to participant's medical chart throughout the conduct of this study.
Change in Child Height From Baseline to 6 Months
Child weight will be assessed using chart review and scale
Time frame: baseline to 6 months
Population: We only analyzed child participants with complete height data at baseline and 6 months.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-PEAR | Change in Child Height From Baseline to 6 Months | 3.78 inches | Standard Deviation 4.13 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Change in Child Height From Baseline to 6 Months | 4.84 inches | Standard Deviation 2.64 |
Change in Child Weight From Baseline to 1 Year
Child weight will be assessed using chart review.
Time frame: 1 year
Population: We were unable to collect this data because we could not gain access to participant's charts throughout the conduct of this study.
Change in Child Weight From Baseline to 6 Months
Child weight will be assessed using chart review and scale
Time frame: baseline to 6 months
Population: We only analyzed child participants with complete data on weight at baseline and 6 months.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-PEAR | Change in Child Weight From Baseline to 6 Months | 4.40 pounds | Standard Deviation 0.74 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Change in Child Weight From Baseline to 6 Months | 3.38 pounds | Standard Deviation 0.99 |
Change in Healthy Eating From Baseline to 3 Months
change in # of fruits & vegetables children consumed, on average, each day as measured by parent report and the EAT FFQ (Eating Assessment in Toddlers Food Frequency Questionnaire). Average number of portions of fruits and vegetables were reported on two questions of a Food Frequency Questionnaire with options ranging from 0-4 servings of fruits and 0-4 servings of vegetables. These scores were added together at each time point with greater scores indicating greater consumption of fruits and vegetables.
Time frame: baseline to 3 months
Population: We only used outcomes on child participants with complete data at baseline and 3 months.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-PEAR | Change in Healthy Eating From Baseline to 3 Months | 0.33 change score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.03 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Change in Healthy Eating From Baseline to 3 Months | 0.2 change score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.17 |
Change in Healthy Eating From Baseline to 6 Months
change in # of fruits & vegetables children consumed, on average, each day as measured by parent report and the EAT FFQ (Eating Assessment in Toddlers Food Frequency Questionnaire). Average number of portions of fruits and vegetables were reported on two questions of a Food Frequency Questionnaire with options ranging from 0-4 servings of fruits and 0-4 servings of vegetables. These scores were added together at each time point with greater scores indicating greater consumption of fruits and vegetables.
Time frame: baseline to 6 months
Population: We only analyzed child participants with complete data at baseline and 6 months on this measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-PEAR | Change in Healthy Eating From Baseline to 6 Months | 0.11 change score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.52 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Change in Healthy Eating From Baseline to 6 Months | -0.2 change score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.17 |
Change in Physical Activity From Baseline to 3 Months
change in # of hours of light, moderate, or vigorous child physical activity, on average, each day as measured by activPAL
Time frame: baseline to 3 months
Population: We only analyzed data on child participants with data on physical activity at baseline and 3 months.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-PEAR | Change in Physical Activity From Baseline to 3 Months | 0.45 hours | Standard Deviation 1.97 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Change in Physical Activity From Baseline to 3 Months | 0.01 hours | Standard Deviation 0.78 |
Change in Physical Activity From Baseline to 6 Months
change in # of hours of light, moderate, or vigorous child physical activity, on average, each day as measured by activPAL
Time frame: baseline to 6 months
Population: We only analyzed data on child participants with complete physical activity data at baseline and 6 months.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-PEAR | Change in Physical Activity From Baseline to 6 Months | 0.32 hours | Standard Deviation 1.35 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Change in Physical Activity From Baseline to 6 Months | 1.33 hours | Standard Deviation 0.89 |
Change in Sedentary Behavior From Baseline to 3 Months
change in # of minutes spent in bouts of sedentary behavior \>60 minutes, on average, each day as measured by activPAL (Physical Activities Logging)
Time frame: baseline to 3 months
Population: Only child participants with complete data for sedentary behavior (activPAL) at baseline and 3 months were included.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-PEAR | Change in Sedentary Behavior From Baseline to 3 Months | 21.01 minutes | Standard Deviation 73.35 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Change in Sedentary Behavior From Baseline to 3 Months | 11.66 minutes | Standard Deviation 31.93 |
Change in Sedentary Behavior From Baseline to 6 Months
change in # minutes of bouts of sedentary behavior \>60 minutes, on average, each day as measured by activPAL
Time frame: baseline to 6 months
Population: Only child participants with complete data for sedentary behavior (activPAL) at baseline and 6 months were included.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-PEAR | Change in Sedentary Behavior From Baseline to 6 Months | -32.54 minutes | Standard Deviation 70.52 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Change in Sedentary Behavior From Baseline to 6 Months | -54.45 minutes | Standard Deviation 38.16 |
Change in Sleep Duration From Baseline to 3 Months
change in # minutes of child sleep, on average, each night as measured by the Phillips Actiwatch
Time frame: baseline to 3 months
Population: We only included child participants with data for sleep (Actiwatch) at baseline and 3 months.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-PEAR | Change in Sleep Duration From Baseline to 3 Months | 13.50 minutes | Standard Deviation 50.03 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Change in Sleep Duration From Baseline to 3 Months | 9.68 minutes | Standard Deviation 34 |
Change in Sleep Duration From Baseline to 6 Months
change in # minutes of child sleep, on average, each night as measured by the Phillips Actiwatch
Time frame: baseline to 6 months
Population: Only child participants who had sleep (Actiwatch) data at baseline and 6 months were included.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-PEAR | Change in Sleep Duration From Baseline to 6 Months | 19.26 minutes | Standard Deviation 52.02 |
| Enhanced Usual Care | Change in Sleep Duration From Baseline to 6 Months | 21.12 minutes | Standard Deviation 18.11 |