Skip to content

OraQuick® HIV Self-Test Study in Canada

A Study to Evaluate the Accuracy, Usability and Readability of the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test Performed by Observed Intended Users in Canada

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05020353
Acronym
OQHIVST
Enrollment
951
Registered
2021-08-25
Start date
2022-06-21
Completion date
2024-05-15
Last updated
2025-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections, HIV Testing

Keywords

HIV, Self-testing, HIVST

Brief summary

Oral fluid based HIV Self-testing (HIVST) provides another innovative and simple option to increase opportunities for HIV testing. At-home testing for HIV using oral fluid has been FDA approved and in use in the USA since 2012, and studies have also shown that interest and acceptability of HIVST with oral fluid is high in other global settings. However data for oral fluid based HIVST within key populations and those at high risk for HIV infection in Canada is limited. This study involves around 900 persons who are non-healthcare professionals and inexperienced in HIV self-testing (intended users) and are presenting at clinic sites across Canada for HIV testing. It will evaluate the accuracy (sensitivity and specificity), usability (persons performs test correctly) and readability (persons successfully interpret test results) of the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test when performed by persons representing intended users living in Canada. A final report of study results will be provided to the Test manufacturer for inclusion in the Health Canada license application process.

Detailed description

Background and Rationale: Self-testing for HIV is an approach with the potential to increase the access, uptake and frequency of HIV testing for those who may not otherwise test and remain undiagnosed. There is increasing evidence showing the acceptability and usability of HIV self-testing (HIVST) in various key populations. In 2016 the World Health Organization recommended HIVST as an alternative option to complement existing HIV testing opportunities. Since then, HIVST use has been scaling up rapidly; for example, Canada's first blood-based (fingerstick) HIV self-test was licensed for use in November 2020. Oral fluid based HIVST provides another innovative and simple option to increase opportunities for HIV testing. At-home testing for HIV using oral fluid has been FDA approved and in use in the USA since 2012, and studies have also shown that interest and acceptability of HIVST with oral fluid is high in other global settings. However data for oral fluid based HIVST within key populations and those at high risk for HIV infection in Canada is limited. Having a licensed oral fluid HIV self-test in addition to the licensed blood-based HIV self-test will allow individuals to choose what is best for them and increase the potential to reach the undiagnosed living with HIV. Objective: This study will evaluate the accuracy, usability (persons performs test correctly) and readability (persons successfully interpret test results) of the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test when performed by persons representing intended users living in Canada. Hypothesis: The OraQuick Self-test as performed by intended users (non-healthcare professional and inexperienced in HIV self-testing) will meet or exceed the accuracy, usability and label comprehension requirements from Health Canada for license as a Class IV in vitro diagnostic device for Canadian market entry. Study Design: This study was designed around the requirements set out in the Health Canada Guidance Document: Guidance for Manufacturers of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDT's) for Use at Point of Care or Self Testing, 2017. It is an investigational device trial designed as a cross-sectional study which employs observational and interview-based methods. Sample population: The study population requirements published by Health Canada stipulates that the prospective study include: 900 lay persons with unknown HIV status including 400 persons at risk for HIV infection (e.g. intravenous drug users, men who have sex with men, etc.). Self-reported practices or behaviour will be used to define those at high risk. A minimum of 900 participants (non-healthcare professional and inexperienced in HIV self-testing) will read the instructions for use and conduct the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test. They will not be provided any training prior to use of the test. A trained healthcare provider or researcher (trained Observer) will watch, and document use of the test and independently read the participants self-test result. The participants will then complete a questionnaire to share their opinion on usability and label comprehension of this test. A minimum of 400 (of the 900) participants will also be provided five mock devices with different results and asked to interpret those results i.e. strong positive; weak positive, negative, invalid with no control and no test line, and invalid with no control and a positive test line. This will evaluate readability of this test. All participants will also have a venous blood sample collected for testing of plasma at a central laboratory with a 4th generation (Ag/Ab combo) HIV enzyme immunoassay that will serve as the comparator method (laboratory reference testing). All self-tests will be confirmed using a Canadian standard HIV testing algorithm. The sensitivity and specificity of the self-test result will be calculated relative to the clinical truth of the participants' HIV status determined by the confirmatory test process, where applicable. Participants will be instructed to return to the clinic for a follow-up visit, two (2) weeks after self-testing to obtain their laboratory test results which will be their official result. Study Intervention Details: Participants will be recruited to the study when they come in for voluntary HIV testing (e.g. POC testing) at a minimum of 3 study sites (different geographic locations). If persons consent to participating, all those enrolled will voluntarily complete a questionnaire (collecting demographics and HIV medical history information) and then provide their venous whole blood sample (for standard of care, laboratory confirmatory testing and comparator method), complete the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test (read test instructions, sample collection, sample testing, result interpretation), complete mock result interpretation, and complete questionnaires - Visit 1 (day 1; about 60 minutes). All patients will be instructed to return to the clinic for a follow-up visit two (2) weeks later to obtain their laboratory test results (Visit 2; about 15 - 60 minutes), post -test counselling, and to be linked to appropriate care depending on the test results.. Patients may also have a point-of-care (POC) test conducted on site as part of the clinic's standard of care testing, outside of the protocol and after all study procedures for Visit 1 are completed.

Interventions

OraQuick® HIV Self-Test in oral fluid conducted by observed intended users (non-healthcare professional and inexperienced in HIV self-testing) compared to laboratory 4th generation Ag/Ab enzyme immunoassay (EIA) results performed on venous blood.

Sponsors

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Unity Health Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Cross-sectional, prospective, field trial (untrained self-tester)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Are 18 years of age and older * Are able to speak / read / write English or French * Have presented for voluntary testing for HIV infection in the clinic or community based setting * Are willing to participate in the study site's standard of care HIV counselling and testing program and receive the study site's standard of care test results * Are willing to be a participant in the study * Are able to provide informed consent i.e. understands and signs the informed consent form * Are able to complete the required testing on the allocated testing day * Are willing to provide the necessary oral fluid and venipuncture blood for use in the study protocol testing methods. * Are of unknown HIV status (last HIV negative test must be a minimum of 3 months prior)

Exclusion criteria

* Do not meet all the inclusion criteria * Are known HIV positive * Are on antiretroviral therapy (ART) or anti-HIV medications for the treatment of HIV, either as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) or experimental vaccine * Have any experience or have ever conducted a rapid diagnostic self-test for HIV or any other sexually transmitted and blood borne illnesses disease * Are currently participating in a concurrent trial of HIV self-tests * Are investigator site employees or immediate family members of sponsor or investigator site employee * Are a practicing medical healthcare professional (doctor, nurse or HIV counsellor that performs HIV testing with Rapid Tests) * Any condition which, in the opinion of the Observer, would make the participant unsuitable or unsafe for enrolment or could interfere with the completion of the assessment and questionnaire etc. or bias the outcome, e.g. being unable to see / read by forgetting to bring reading glasses, being intoxicated, acute sickness, visibly distressed.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Device Performance: Positive and Negative Percent AgreementOutcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.Sensitivity and specificity of study participants' self-interpreted self-test results with the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test versus the HIV status as determined by the 4th generation EIA and confirmatory testing for HIV as necessary.
Observer Usability AssessmentOutcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.Observation to determine if participants perform all critical steps correctly
Participant and Observer InterpretationsOutcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.Confirmation by Observer to determine if participant interprets test results correctly and successful interpretation of various contrived (mock) test device results.
Label ComprehensionOutcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.To determine that the participant is aware of key messages in labelling including test limitations and what to do following the test result.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Readability or Interpretation (Mock Devices)Outcome measured following mock device interpretation on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.The percentage of correct interpretations of contrived devices compared to the expected results.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Investigational Device
Observed self-test of oral fluid with the OraQuick HIV Self-Test OraQuick® HIV Self-Test: OraQuick® HIV Self-Test in oral fluid conducted by observed intended users (non-healthcare professional and inexperienced in HIV self-testing) compared to laboratory 4th generation Ag/Ab enzyme immunoassay (EIA) results performed on venous blood.
911
Total911

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyProtocol Violation7
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject33

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInvestigational Device
Age, Customized
18-25 years
307 Participants
Age, Customized
26-35 years
302 Participants
Age, Customized
36-45 years
158 Participants
Age, Customized
46-55 years
73 Participants
Age, Customized
>55 years
70 Participants
Age, Customized
Prefer not to answer
1 Participants
Education
College
242 Participants
Education
No formal education
0 Participants
Education
Prefer not to answer
3 Participants
Education
Primary school
20 Participants
Education
Secondary school
226 Participants
Education
University or higher
420 Participants
Employment
Employed
405 Participants
Employment
Prefer not to answer
7 Participants
Employment
Retired
23 Participants
Employment
Student
261 Participants
Employment
Unemployed
215 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
911 Participants
HIV Status
Negative status
485 Participants
HIV Status
Unknown status/never tested
426 Participants
Medical Condition
Answer not provided
768 Participants
Medical Condition
Diabetes
21 Participants
Medical Condition
Hypertension
23 Participants
Medical Condition
Other medical condition
86 Participants
Medical Condition
Sexually transmitted infection
13 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African/Caribbean/Black
211 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
East Asian
85 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Indigenous
46 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
LatinX
54 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Middle Eastern/North African
25 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
33 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
South Asian
222 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
235 Participants
Reading/Writing Impairment
Answer not provided
6 Participants
Reading/Writing Impairment
No
866 Participants
Reading/Writing Impairment
Yes
39 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
British Columbia
102 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
Manitoba
56 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
Ontario
662 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
Quebec
91 Participants
Self-Reported HIV Risk
High risk
520 Participants
Self-Reported HIV Risk
Low risk
391 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Cis-female
450 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Cis-male
434 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Other
26 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Prefer not to anwer
1 Participants
Sexual Orientation
Bisexual
82 Participants
Sexual Orientation
Gay/Lesbian
150 Participants
Sexual Orientation
Heterosexual
606 Participants
Sexual Orientation
Other
52 Participants
Sexual Orientation
Prefer not to answer
21 Participants
Tested for HIV Before
Answer not provided
10 Participants
Tested for HIV Before
No
422 Participants
Tested for HIV Before
Yes
479 Participants
Visual Impairment
Answer not provided
6 Participants
Visual Impairment
No
604 Participants
Visual Impairment
Yes
301 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 951
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 951
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 951

Outcome results

Primary

Device Performance: Positive and Negative Percent Agreement

Sensitivity and specificity of study participants' self-interpreted self-test results with the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test versus the HIV status as determined by the 4th generation EIA and confirmatory testing for HIV as necessary.

Time frame: Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.

Population: The invalids, inconclusive and not sure/do not know were not included in the calculations of Positive and Negative % Agreement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Self-testing ParticipantsDevice Performance: Positive and Negative Percent AgreementTrue Positive1 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsDevice Performance: Positive and Negative Percent AgreementFalse Negative0 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsDevice Performance: Positive and Negative Percent AgreementTrue Negative880 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsDevice Performance: Positive and Negative Percent AgreementFalse Positive0 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsDevice Performance: Positive and Negative Percent AgreementInconclusive1 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsDevice Performance: Positive and Negative Percent AgreementPositive % Agreement1 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsDevice Performance: Positive and Negative Percent AgreementNegative % Agreement880 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsDevice Performance: Positive and Negative Percent AgreementInvalid20 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsDevice Performance: Positive and Negative Percent AgreementNot sure/Do not know9 Participants
Primary

Label Comprehension

To determine that the participant is aware of key messages in labelling including test limitations and what to do following the test result.

Time frame: Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.

Population: The numbers are based on survey responses which varied across the different survey questions.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Self-testing ParticipantsLabel ComprehensionWere the Instructions for Use (IFU) easy to follow?Yes878 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsLabel ComprehensionDid you use the Instructions for Use (IFU) sheet to help you complete the test?Yes881 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsLabel ComprehensionDid you use the Instructions for Use (IFU) sheet to help you complete the test?No22 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsLabel ComprehensionWere the Instructions for Use (IFU) easy to follow?No24 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsLabel ComprehensionWere the pictures and illustrations in the Instruction for Use (IFU) helpful?Yes878 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsLabel ComprehensionWere the pictures and illustrations in the Instruction for Use (IFU) helpful?No24 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsLabel ComprehensionWas the Self-Test easy to use?Yes895 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsLabel ComprehensionWas the Self-Test easy to use?No7 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsLabel ComprehensionAre you confident you could perform this test on your own?Yes899 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsLabel ComprehensionAre you confident you could perform this test on your own?No3 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsLabel ComprehensionWould you use this test again if it were available to you?Yes882 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsLabel ComprehensionWould you use this test again if it were available to you?No20 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsLabel ComprehensionWould you prefer to use this test at home (yes) or get tested at a clinic (no)?Yes697 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsLabel ComprehensionWould you prefer to use this test at home (yes) or get tested at a clinic (no)?No205 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsLabel ComprehensionWould you recommend this test to others? (e.g. a sexual partner, friend)Yes890 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsLabel ComprehensionWould you recommend this test to others? (e.g. a sexual partner, friend)No12 Participants
Primary

Observer Usability Assessment

Observation to determine if participants perform all critical steps correctly

Time frame: Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.

Population: Totals for each category varied based on participant responses

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the study participant remove the cap from the test tube?Expected response896 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the study participant remove the cap from the test tube?Unexpected response10 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentWas the study participant able to find the test stick packet?Expected response903 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentWas the study participant able to find the test stick packet?Unexpected response3 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the participant perform any steps out of the order?Unexpected response106 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the participant miss any step and continue the process despite a missed or incorrect step?Expected response860 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the participant miss any step and continue the process despite a missed or incorrect step?Unexpected response46 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the participant quit the process at any point?Unexpected response1 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the study participant wait 20 minutes before reading the results of the test?Expected response820 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the participant quit the process at any point?Expected response905 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the study participant wait 20 minutes before reading the results of the test?Unexpected response86 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the study participant read the instructions for use (IFU)?Expected response859 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the study participant read the instructions for use (IFU)?Unexpected response47 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentWere the instructions for use (IFU) read before the test?Expected response701 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentWere the instructions for use (IFU) read before the test?Unexpected response205 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentWas the IFU referred to during the test process?Expected response864 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentWas the IFU referred to during the test process?Unexpected response42 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the study participant remove the contents of the test pack?Expected response901 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the study participant remove the contents of the test pack?Unexpected response5 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentWas the study participant able to find the test tube packet?Expected response905 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentWas the study participant able to find the test tube packet?Unexpected response1 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the study participant remove the test tube from the packet?Expected response905 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the study participant remove the test tube from the packet?Unexpected response1 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the study participant place the test tube in the holder?Expected response848 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the study participant place the test tube in the holder?Unexpected response58 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the study participant have any difficulty with the test tube?Expected response731 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the study participant have any difficulty with the test tube?Unexpected response175 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the study participant remove the test stick from the packet?Expected response902 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the study participant remove the test stick from the packet?Unexpected response4 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the study participant touch the flat pad?Expected response859 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the study participant touch the flat pad?Unexpected response47 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the study participant collect the sample correctly (1x upper and lower swab)?Expected response754 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the study participant collect the sample correctly (1x upper and lower swab)?Unexpected response152 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the study participant place the test stick in the test tube correctly?Expected response889 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the study participant place the test stick in the test tube correctly?Unexpected response17 Expected Responses
Self-testing ParticipantsObserver Usability AssessmentDid the participant perform any steps out of the order?Expected response800 Expected Responses
Primary

Participant and Observer Interpretations

Confirmation by Observer to determine if participant interprets test results correctly and successful interpretation of various contrived (mock) test device results.

Time frame: Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Self-testing ParticipantsParticipant and Observer InterpretationsParticipant & Observer Agreement884 Participants
Self-testing ParticipantsParticipant and Observer InterpretationsParticipant & Observer Disagreement22 Participants
Secondary

Readability or Interpretation (Mock Devices)

The percentage of correct interpretations of contrived devices compared to the expected results.

Time frame: Outcome measured following mock device interpretation on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Self-testing ParticipantsReadability or Interpretation (Mock Devices)Strong positive418 In Concordance
Self-testing ParticipantsReadability or Interpretation (Mock Devices)Weak positive329 In Concordance
Self-testing ParticipantsReadability or Interpretation (Mock Devices)Negative453 In Concordance
Self-testing ParticipantsReadability or Interpretation (Mock Devices)Invalid, test line present273 In Concordance
Self-testing ParticipantsReadability or Interpretation (Mock Devices)Invalid, no control line or test line448 In Concordance

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026