Skip to content

Topo-pachimetric Accelerated Epi-On Cross-linking Compared to Dresden Protocol Using Riboflavin With Vitamin E TPGS

Topo-pachimetric Accelerated Epi-On Cross-linking Compared to Dresden Protocol Using Riboflavin With Vitamin E TPGS: Results of a 2-year Randomized Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05019768
Enrollment
41
Registered
2021-08-25
Start date
2017-09-01
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2026-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Keratoconus

Brief summary

In the present study the investigators compare the clinical outcome corneal cross linking with either the stand-ard Dresden (sCXL) or the accelerated custom-fast (aCFXL) ultraviolet A irradiation protocol using riboflavin-D-α-Tocopheryl polyethyleneglycol1000 succinate for progressive keratoconus.

Interventions

OTHERaccelerated custom-fast CXL

The accelerated custom fast CXL (aCFXL) has been developed on a published mathematical model that takes into consideration objective variables such as the equation governing the UVA-induced riboflavin consumption rate and the corneal thickness at its thinnest point. By knowing both values, the mathematical model allows to objectively calculate both the exact UVA irradiation value (intensity), expressed in mW/cm2, and the irradiation time

The standard CXL procedure has been carried on following the Dresden protocol

Sponsors

Ciro Caruso
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* documented progressive keratoconus * changes in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) above 1.00 D * Corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA) above 1.00 D * spherical equivalent greater than 0.50 D

Exclusion criteria

* Corneal pachymetry of less than 400 µm * less than 2000 cells/cm2, * corneal scarring, * nystagmus or any motility disorder that prevented a fixed gaze during the examination * Current contact lens use

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Topographical parameters2 yearsMaximum keratometry: diopters Mean keratometry: diopters Minimum corneal tickness: diopters

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Refractive parameters2 yearsCorrected distance acuity (BCVA): Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR)
Biomechanical parameters2 yearsCorneal hysteresis: mmHg

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 16, 2026