Skip to content

Caring for Providers to Improve Patient Experience Study Phase 2 in Migori County

Addressing Provider Stress and Unconscious Bias to Improve Quality of Maternal Health Care

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05019131
Acronym
CPIPE2
Enrollment
83
Registered
2021-08-24
Start date
2021-08-16
Completion date
2023-08-31
Last updated
2025-05-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adverse Outcomes, Burnout, Discrimination, Social, Healthcare Provider, Maternal Health, Mental Health, Quality of Care, Stress, Stress, Emotional, Stress, Psychological

Keywords

providers, mental health, unconscious bias, prejudice, Kenya, stress, burnout, person-centered care, quality of care, discrimination

Brief summary

The activities described in this proposal are aimed at addressing health care provider stress and unconscious bias to improve quality of maternal health care, particularly related to the person-centered dimensions of care-i.e. care that is respectful and responsive to women's needs, preferences, and values. The investigators focus on health provider stress and unconscious bias because they are key drivers of poor-quality care that are often not addressed in interventions designed to improve quality of maternal health care. The investigators plan to (1) design an intervention that enables providers to identify and manage their stress and unconscious bias; (2) pilot the intervention to assess its feasibility and acceptability; and (3) assess preliminary effect of the intervention on: (a) provider knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to stress and unconscious bias; and (b) provider stress levels.

Detailed description

Poor person-centered maternal health care (PCMHC) contributes to high maternal and neonatal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), and disparities in PCMHC are driving disparities in use of maternal health services., However, little research exists on how to improve PCMHC and reduce disparities. The investigators seek to fill this gap with this project. They propose targeting health provider stress and unconscious bias as fundamental factors driving both poor PCMHC and disparities in PCMHC. Health care provider stress and unconscious bias are important to consider because: (1) providers in low-resource settings often work under very stressful conditions; (2) unconscious bias is prevalent in every society including SSA; and (3) these factors are mutually reinforcing drivers of poor quality care and disparities in person-centered care. In the first phase of the project (CPIPE1), they conducted research to examine (1) the factors associated with PCMHC and identified provider stress and unconscious bias as key contributing factors. They also examined the levels of provider stress and unconscious bias and the types of stressors and biases in Migori County, Kenya. The results of that research will be used to inform this phase (CPIPE2), the aims of which are to: (1) design a multicomponent theory and evidence-based intervention that enables providers to identify and manage their stress and unconscious bias; (2) pilot the intervention to assess its feasibility and acceptability; and (3) assess preliminary effect of the intervention on: (a) provider knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to stress and unconscious bias; and (b) provider stress levels using a pretest-posttest control group design. They will use the results of the pilot to refine the intervention and develop an R01 proposal for a multi-site evaluation with a larger sample and longer follow up to assess impact on PCMHC. This study will yield valuable information to inform quality improvement efforts for PCMHC.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPeer support and mentorship

facilitated peer and mentorship opportunities

Engaged leadership at the county and facility levels

Facilitate local champions to promote intervention

BEHAVIORALTraining

trainings to reduce conscious bias and stress

Sponsors

Kenya Medical Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Providers working in maternity units of the intervention facilities are all eligible.

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to attend scheduled training.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Unconscious Bias Knowledge and Attitudes Score From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline and 6 monthsThe unconscious bias knowledge and attitudes score is measured by 17 survey questions with scores ranging from 0 to 17. Higher scores indicate higher knowledge and positive attitudes regarding unconscious bias and unconscious bias mitigation
Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) Score From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline and 6 monthsThe Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) score ranges from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress.
Change in Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure (SMBM) Score From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline and 6 monthsThe Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure range from 1 to 7 with higher scores indicating higher burnout
Change in Stress Knowledge and Attitudes Score From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline and 6 monthsThe stress knowledge and attitudes score is measured by 14 survey questions with scores ranging from 0 to 14. Higher scores indicate higher knowledge and positive attitudes regarding stress and stress management. We used 13 of the items from the 14-item survey scale. The score range used is 0 to 13- as noted in the limitations section.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Hair Cortisol Levels From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline and 6 monthsThere are no specified cut-offs for cortisol levels, but, on average, higher cortisol levels indicate higher stress.
Change in Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Levels From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline and 6 monthsThere are no specified cut-offs for HRV but, on average, lower HRV scores indicate higher stress
Change in Socioeconomic Status-person Centered Maternity Care Implicit Association Test (IAT) ScoreBaseline and 6 monthsIAT scores vary between -2 and +2. For this study, higher positive scores indicates a stronger implicit association between high status with good patient and low status with difficult patient
Change in Explicit Bias Scores From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline and 6 monthsThe explicit bias scores are from responses to a vignette and range from 4 to 28. Higher scores indicate more explicit bias

Countries

Kenya

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Health facilities participating in the study

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention Arm
1. Training: The investigators will develop a training for providers that addresses the following topics: Stress & positive coping mechanisms; Unconscious bias awareness and mitigation; Person-centered maternity care; Dealing with difficult situations; and Teamwork and communication; 2. Peer support and mentorship: The investigators will identify what works best for these groups in terms of group composition, size, and how the groups want to interact. 3. Leadership engagement: To ensure leadership buy in, support and sustainability of the intervention, the investigators will engage leadership of the County. 4. Embedded champions: To facilitate ongoing engagement, the investigators will identify local leaders, and invite them to training where they will be taught how to facilitate peer support groups and serve as champions. Training: trainings to reduce conscious bias and stress Peer support and mentorship: facilitated peer and mentorship opportunities Leadership engagement: Engaged leadership at the county and facility levels Embedded champions: Facilitate local champions to promote intervention
40
Control Arm
Will not receive any training during the intervention period
43
Total83

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up03

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntervention ArmControl ArmTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
40 Participants43 Participants83 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
40 Participants43 Participants83 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Kenya
40 Participants43 Participants83 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 Participants29 Participants61 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants14 Participants22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 400 / 43
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 400 / 43
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 400 / 43

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) Score From Baseline to 6 Months

The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) score ranges from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: health care providers

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention ArmChange in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) Score From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline20.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.86
Intervention ArmChange in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) Score From Baseline to 6 MonthsEnd line18.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.34
Control ArmChange in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) Score From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline20.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.51
Control ArmChange in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) Score From Baseline to 6 MonthsEnd line20.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.57
Primary

Change in Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure (SMBM) Score From Baseline to 6 Months

The Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure range from 1 to 7 with higher scores indicating higher burnout

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: health care providers

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention ArmChange in Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure (SMBM) Score From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline3.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Intervention ArmChange in Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure (SMBM) Score From Baseline to 6 MonthsEnd line2.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Control ArmChange in Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure (SMBM) Score From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline3.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Control ArmChange in Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure (SMBM) Score From Baseline to 6 MonthsEnd line3.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.08
Primary

Change in Stress Knowledge and Attitudes Score From Baseline to 6 Months

The stress knowledge and attitudes score is measured by 14 survey questions with scores ranging from 0 to 14. Higher scores indicate higher knowledge and positive attitudes regarding stress and stress management. We used 13 of the items from the 14-item survey scale. The score range used is 0 to 13- as noted in the limitations section.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: health care providers

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention ArmChange in Stress Knowledge and Attitudes Score From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline7.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.41
Intervention ArmChange in Stress Knowledge and Attitudes Score From Baseline to 6 MonthsEnd line9.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Control ArmChange in Stress Knowledge and Attitudes Score From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline7.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.77
Control ArmChange in Stress Knowledge and Attitudes Score From Baseline to 6 MonthsEnd line8.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.01
Primary

Change in Unconscious Bias Knowledge and Attitudes Score From Baseline to 6 Months

The unconscious bias knowledge and attitudes score is measured by 17 survey questions with scores ranging from 0 to 17. Higher scores indicate higher knowledge and positive attitudes regarding unconscious bias and unconscious bias mitigation

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: health care providers

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention ArmChange in Unconscious Bias Knowledge and Attitudes Score From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline8.93 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.94
Intervention ArmChange in Unconscious Bias Knowledge and Attitudes Score From Baseline to 6 MonthsEnd line10.70 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.73
Control ArmChange in Unconscious Bias Knowledge and Attitudes Score From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline9.13 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.14
Control ArmChange in Unconscious Bias Knowledge and Attitudes Score From Baseline to 6 MonthsEnd line9.45 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.16
Secondary

Change in Explicit Bias Scores From Baseline to 6 Months

The explicit bias scores are from responses to a vignette and range from 4 to 28. Higher scores indicate more explicit bias

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Health care providers

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention ArmChange in Explicit Bias Scores From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline17.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.06
Intervention ArmChange in Explicit Bias Scores From Baseline to 6 MonthsEnd line15.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.76
Control ArmChange in Explicit Bias Scores From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline16.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.27
Control ArmChange in Explicit Bias Scores From Baseline to 6 MonthsEnd line14.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.12
Secondary

Change in Hair Cortisol Levels From Baseline to 6 Months

There are no specified cut-offs for cortisol levels, but, on average, higher cortisol levels indicate higher stress.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: health care providers

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention ArmChange in Hair Cortisol Levels From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline74.13 pg/mgStandard Deviation 147.38
Intervention ArmChange in Hair Cortisol Levels From Baseline to 6 MonthsEnd line41.50 pg/mgStandard Deviation 72.19
Control ArmChange in Hair Cortisol Levels From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline8.43 pg/mgStandard Deviation 3.03
Control ArmChange in Hair Cortisol Levels From Baseline to 6 MonthsEnd line36.05 pg/mgStandard Deviation 58.29
Secondary

Change in Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Levels From Baseline to 6 Months

There are no specified cut-offs for HRV but, on average, lower HRV scores indicate higher stress

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: health care providers

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention ArmChange in Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Levels From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline3.70 msStandard Deviation 0.59
Intervention ArmChange in Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Levels From Baseline to 6 MonthsEnd line3.71 msStandard Deviation 0.43
Control ArmChange in Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Levels From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline3.71 msStandard Deviation 0.61
Control ArmChange in Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Levels From Baseline to 6 MonthsEnd line3.84 msStandard Deviation 0.63
Secondary

Change in Socioeconomic Status-person Centered Maternity Care Implicit Association Test (IAT) Score

IAT scores vary between -2 and +2. For this study, higher positive scores indicates a stronger implicit association between high status with good patient and low status with difficult patient

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: health care providers

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention ArmChange in Socioeconomic Status-person Centered Maternity Care Implicit Association Test (IAT) ScoreBaseline0.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.37
Intervention ArmChange in Socioeconomic Status-person Centered Maternity Care Implicit Association Test (IAT) ScoreEnd line0.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Control ArmChange in Socioeconomic Status-person Centered Maternity Care Implicit Association Test (IAT) ScoreBaseline0.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
Control ArmChange in Socioeconomic Status-person Centered Maternity Care Implicit Association Test (IAT) ScoreEnd line0.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026