Skip to content

Proof of Concept Study of Rilzabrutinib in Adult Patients With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Proof-of-concept Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Rilzabrutinib in Adult Patients With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis Who Are Inadequate Responders or Intolerant to Topical Corticosteroids

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05018806
Enrollment
124
Registered
2021-08-24
Start date
2021-09-09
Completion date
2023-06-23
Last updated
2026-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atopic Dermatitis

Brief summary

This was a parallel treatment, Phase 2, double-blind, 2-arm, placebo-controlled study with 2 staggered cohorts (2 arms in each cohort) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rilzabrutinib in adult participants (aged at least 18 years) with moderate-to-severe AD and intolerance or inadequate response to topical corticosteroids (TCS). The total study duration per participant was expected to be approximately 21 weeks, including up to 4 weeks of screening, 16 weeks of on-treatment double-blind period, 1 week of post-treatment follow-up.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Pharmaceutical form: Tablet Route of administration: Oral

DRUGRilzabrutinib

Pharmaceutical form: Tablet Route of administration: Oral

Sponsors

Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* AD as defined by the American Academy of Dermatology Consensus Criteria. * History of AD for at least 12 months prior to baseline as determined by the Investigator through patient interview. * Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≥ 12 at screening and at baseline. * IGA score ≥ 3 (on the 0 to 4 IGA scale) at baseline. * BSA of AD involvement ≥ 10% at baseline. * Documented inadequate response or intolerance to TCS within 6 months prior to baseline visit * Baseline PP-NRS score for maximum itch intensity ≥4. * All contraceptive use by men and women should be consistent with local regulations regarding the methods of contraception for those participating in clinical studies. * For optional substudy only: Willingness to have 2 tape strips for comparison of baseline and treatment response.

Exclusion criteria

* Skin comorbidities that may interfere with study assessments such as psoriasis, tinea corporis, lupus erythematosus. * Conditions that may predispose the patient to excessive bleeding. * Any other clinically significant disease, condition, or medical history that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would interfere with participant safety, trial evaluations, and/or trial procedures. * Laboratory abnormalities at the screening visit * History of serious infections requiring intravenous therapy with the potential for recurrence (as judged by the Site Investigator and the Sponsor Medical Monitor), with less than 4 weeks interval between resolution of serious infection and first dose of study drug, or currently active moderate to severe infection at Screening (Grade 2 or higher) including active coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). * Live vaccine except Bacille Calmette Guerin-vaccination within 28 days prior to Day 1 or plan to receive one during the trial; Bacille Calmette Guerin-vaccination within 12 months prior to Screening. * COVID-19 vaccine within 14 days prior to Study Day 1. * Refractory nausea and vomiting, malabsorption, external biliary shunt, or significant bowel resection that would preclude adequate rilzabrutinib/placebo absorption. * Initiation of prescription moisturizers (with or without additives such as ceramide, hyaluronic acid, urea, or filaggrin), topical anesthetics or antihistamines during the screening period. * Use of TCS, topical calcineurin (tacrolimus, and/or pimecrolimus) or topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor within 1 week prior to baseline and as concomitant medication. * Use of systemic corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to baseline and as concomitant medication. * Phototherapy for AD or regular use (more than 2 visits per week) of a tanning booth/parlor within 4 weeks prior to baseline or likely to be required as concomitant procedure during the study. * Use of mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclosporine, dapsone, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), Kineret (anakinra), Enbrel (etanercept), or any other immunosuppressant not mentioned in this exclusion criterion within 4 weeks prior to baseline. * Use of infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, abatacept, tocilizumab, certolizumab, secukinumab, IFN-γ, JAK inhibitors, dupilumab, and any other biologic or targeted-synthetic disease modifier drug not mentioned in this exclusion criterion or in exclusion criterion, as well as plasmapheresis within 12 weeks prior to baseline. * Use of anti-CD20 drugs such as rituximab, ofatumumab, other long-acting biologics within 6 months prior to baseline (or shorter if there is documented B cell reconstitution for anti-CD20 drugs). * Use of proton pump inhibitor drugs such as omeprazole and esomeprazole within 3 days of baseline (it is acceptable to change participant to H2 receptor blocking drugs prior to baseline). * Concomitant use of known systemic strong-to-moderate inhibitors and inducers of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) within 14 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to baseline. * Previous use of a BTK inhibitor. * Had received any investigational drug (or is currently using an investigational device) within the 30 days before baseline, or at least 5 times the respective elimination half-life time (whichever is longer). * Active TB or a history of incompletely treated TB, Quantiferon positive patients, Clinically significant abnormality consistent with prior/active TB infection based upon chest radiograph with at least posterior-anterior view, Suspected extrapulmonary TB infection, or patients at high risk of contracting TB. The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ScoreBaseline (Day 1) to Week 16The EASI index is a validated investigator-administered scoring system used to measure the severity of clinical signs in atopic dermatitis (AD). Four AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness \[induration, papulation, edema\], scratching \[excoriation\], and lichenification) were each assessed for severity by the investigator or designee on a scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe). In addition, the area of AD involvement were assessed as a percentage by body area of head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, and converted to a score of 0 to 6. 0: 0% of body surface area (BSA) involvement with AD; 1: 1-9%; 2: 10-29%; 2: 30-49%; 4: 50-69%; 5: 70-89% and 6: 90-100% of BSA involvement with AD. Total score ranged from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum); higher scores indicated greater severity of AD. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment value.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1 At Week 16Week 16IGA is a static 5-point measure of disease severity based on an overall assessment of the skin lesions on a 5-point scale (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4 = severe disease). Higher score indicated higher severity.
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-75 (Reduction of EASI Score By ≥75% From Baseline) At Week 16Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 16The EASI index is a validated investigator-administered scoring system used to measure the severity of clinical signs in AD. Four AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness \[induration, papulation, edema\], scratching \[excoriation\], and lichenification) were each assessed for severity by the investigator or designee on a scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe). In addition, the area of AD involvement were assessed as a percentage by body area of head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, and converted to a score of 0 to 6. 0: 0% of BSA involvement with AD; 1: 1-9%; 2: 10-29%; 2: 30-49%; 4: 50-69%; 5: 70-89% and 6: 90-100% of BSA involvement with AD. Total score ranged from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum); higher scores indicated greater severity of AD. Participants who achieved EASI-75 were defined as participants with reduction of EASI score by ≥75% from baseline.
Percentage Of Participants With Reduction of Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) of ≥4 Points From Baseline at Week 16Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 16The PP-NRS is a simple assessment tool that participants used to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during a daily recall period. Participants were asked to rate their worst itch on a 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable) NRS by answering the following question: For itch intensity, "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable', how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?". The total score on the scale ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse symptoms. A minimum of 4 daily scores out of the 7 days is required to calculate the baseline average score.
Number of Participants With Weekly Average of Daily PP-NRS Reduction ≥4 From Baseline During The 16-Week Treatment PeriodBaseline (Day 1) and Week 16The PP-NRS is a simple assessment tool that participants used to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during a daily recall period. Participants were asked to rate their worst itch on a 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable) NRS by answering the following question: For itch intensity, "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable', how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?". The total score on the scale ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse symptoms. A minimum of 4 daily scores out of the 7 days is required to calculate the baseline average score.
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 16 In EASI ScoreBaseline (Day 1) to Week 16The EASI index is a validated investigator-administered scoring system used to measure the severity of clinical signs in AD. Four AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness \[induration, papulation, edema\], scratching \[excoriation\], and lichenification) were each assessed for severity by the investigator or designee on a scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe). In addition, the area of AD involvement were assessed as a percentage by body area of head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, and converted to a score of 0 to 6. 0: 0% of BSA involvement with AD; 1: 1-9%; 2: 10-29%; 2: 30-49%; 4: 50-69%; 5: 70-89% and 6: 90-100% of BSA involvement with AD. Total score ranged from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum); higher scores indicated greater severity of AD. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment value.
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-50/90 (Reduction of EASI Score by ≥50% or ≥90% From Baseline) at Week 16Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 16The EASI index is a validated investigator-administered scoring system used to measure the severity of clinical signs in AD. Four AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness \[induration, papulation, edema\], scratching \[excoriation\], and lichenification) were each assessed for severity by the investigator or designee on a scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe). In addition, the area of AD involvement were assessed as a percentage by body area of head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, and converted to a score of 0 to 6. 0: 0% of BSA involvement with AD; 1: 1-9%; 2: 10-29%; 2: 30-49%; 4: 50-69%; 5: 70-89% and 6: 90-100% of BSA involvement with AD. Total score ranged from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum); higher scores indicated greater severity of AD. Participants who achieved EASI-50/90 were defined as participants with reduction of EASI score by ≥50% or ≥90% from baseline respectively.
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Percent BSA of ADBaseline (Day 1) to Week 16BSA affected by AD were assessed for each section of the body (the possible highest score for each region was: head and neck \[10%\], trunk including genitalia \[30%\], upper limbs \[20%\], lower limbs \[40%\]) and were reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined. Total score ranges from 0% to 100%. The higher score indicates a worse value and a lower score indicates a better value. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment value.
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Weekly Average of Daily PP-NRSBaseline (Day 1) to Week 16The PP-NRS is a simple assessment tool that participants used to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during a daily recall period. Participants were asked to rate their worst itch on a 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable) NRS by answering the following question: For itch intensity, "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable', how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?". The total score on the scale ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse symptoms. A minimum of 4 daily scores out of the 7 days is required to calculate the baseline average score. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment value.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Weekly Average of Daily PP-NRSBaseline (Day 1) to Week 16The PP-NRS is a simple assessment tool that participants used to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during a daily recall period. Participants were asked to rate their worst itch on a 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable) NRS by answering the following question: For itch intensity, "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable', how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?". The total score on the scale ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse symptoms. A minimum of 4 daily scores out of the 7 days is required to calculate the baseline average score. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment value.
Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA*BSA-50/75/90 (Reduction of IGA*BSA by ≥50% or 75% or 90% From Baseline) At Week 16Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 16IGA is a static 5-point measure of disease severity based on an overall assessment of the skin lesions on a 5-point scale (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4 = severe disease). Higher score indicated higher severity. Participants who achieved IGA\*BSA-50-75-90 were defined as participants with reduction of IGA\*BSA by ≥50% or 75% or 90% from baseline.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) and Study Intervention DiscontinuationBaseline (Day 1) to 16 weeksAn AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the treatment-emergent period. SAE was any AE that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. An AESI was an AE (serious or nonserious) of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and immediate notification by the investigator to the Sponsor was required.

Countries

Canada, Chile, Czechia, Germany, Netherlands, Poland, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 31 centers in 7 countries. 61 participants in twice a day (BID) cohort and 106 participants in three times a day (TID) cohort were screened from 09 September 2021 to 24 February 2023, of which 16 in BID cohort and 27 in TID cohort were screen failures. Screen failures were mainly due to not meeting the eligibility criteria.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 45 participants in BID cohort and 79 participants in TID cohort were randomized in a ratio of 3:2 to receive either rilzabrutinib or matching placebo on Day 1 in the BID and TID cohorts, respectively.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous38.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.1
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
102 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 180 / 270 / 310 / 48
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 1815 / 2719 / 3138 / 48
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 180 / 271 / 311 / 48

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 14, 2026