Skip to content

Bio-Integrative Versus Metallic Screws for Calcaneus Osteotomies

Bio-Integrative Versus Metallic Screws for Calcaneus Osteotomies: A Non- Inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05018130
Enrollment
44
Registered
2021-08-24
Start date
2021-11-01
Completion date
2024-12-01
Last updated
2023-09-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Resorption, Cavus Deformity, Complication, Flatfoot, Osteolysis

Keywords

Bone Healing, Osteotomy, Calcaneus, Bio-integrative, Metallic, Screws

Brief summary

The use of bio-integrative implants in orthopedic surgery is growing exponentially. As many biomechanical and histological studies were able to sustain its structural and biological properties, few clinical studies are available to support its advantages, such as good osteosynthesis, lower rates of removal, and diminished implant-related artifact in imaging studies. This information is vital to providers when choosing the proper material and planning postoperative treatment. This trial intends to test the capacity of the bioabsorbable screws in reaching the same clinical and radiographical outcomes of the current metallic screws.

Detailed description

A minimum of 44 patients undergoing Medial or Lateral Displacement Calcaneal Osteotomy (MDCO) will be randomized in two parallel groups for surgery, considering applied the implant. One group will be operated using two 4.0mm cannulated bio-integrative (absorbable) screws, and the other group using two 4.0mm cannulated metallic screws. Patients will be blinded evaluated for a mean follow-up of twelve weeks in terms of bone healing, complications, and implant-related artifact using weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT).

Interventions

PROCEDURECalcaneus Osteotomy (Metallic)

Calcaneus Displacement Osteotomy using two metallic screws

PROCEDURECalcaneus Osteotomy (Bio-integrative)

Calcaneus Displacement Osteotomy using two bio-integrative screws

Sponsors

University of Iowa
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The evaluator doctor will not have access to the protocol test applied to each patient and the surgeries will be conducted by different physicians.

Intervention model description

Randomized, investigator-blinded, in parallel groups, two-arms, single-center, non-inferiority, clinical trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Individuals must be older than 18 and younger than 75 years of age, both genders; * Participants must be experiencing symptoms related to their baseline condition for at least six months before the surgery; * Clinical diagnosis of hindfoot malignment, defined as the presence of a clinical hindfoot angle above 10 degrees of valgus or any degree of varus; * Surgical planning, including a calcaneus displacement osteotomy through a traditional oblique cut.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous surgery involving the affected calcaneus; * History or documented evidence of autoimmune or peripheral vascular diseases; * History or documented evidence of peripheral neuropathy (nervous compression syndrome, tarsal tunnel syndrome) or systemic inflammatory disease a (rheumatoid arthritis, spondylitis, Reiter Syndrome, etc.); * Any condition that represents a contraindication of the proposed therapies; * Impossibility or incapacity to sign the informed Consent Form; * Presence of infectious process (superficial on the skin and cellular tissue, or deep in the bone) in the region to be treated. * Osteotomies requiring resection of wedges (Dweyer, triple Dweyer, etc.); * Osteotomies planned to occur in a non-traditional cut (Malerba, Scarf, etc.).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bone healing6 weeks\- Amount of bone bridging crossing the osteotomy site: Determined by the percentage of bone trabeculae crossing the osteotomy site on every tomography cut (amount of the cut in millimeters that shows bone spanning the two fragments divided by the total amount of osteotomy's surface on the cut). \- Weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT) acquisitions will be used to determine this percentage.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Implant-related artifact6 weeks\- Quantity of Hounsfield units around the implants Measured on WBCT acquisitions.
Complications6 weeks\- Percentage of minor and major complications: Dehiscence: inability to heal the soft tissue coverage until the end of the 4th post-operative week. Peripherical nerve damage: hypoesthesia or paresthesia not solved until the 6th week after the surgery. Infection: clinical signs of site infection or pus drainage at the wound that required antibiotics.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactNacime Salomao Barbachan Mansur, MD, PhD
nacime-mansur@iowa.edu3194007911

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026