Skip to content

E-training of Inmate Peer Caregivers for Enhancing Geriatric and End-of-life Care in Prisons

E-training of Inmate Peer Caregivers for Enhancing Geriatric and End-of-life Care in Prisons - Phase II

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05017129
Enrollment
83
Registered
2021-08-23
Start date
2020-06-15
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2026-07-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aging

Brief summary

The demographics of the U.S. prison population are shifting at a dramatic rate requiring new approaches to prison healthcare. Current estimates suggest that there are 2.3 million incarcerated persons in the U.S. Similar to the free world, the aging of the Baby Boom generation is occurring in prisons. Notably, inmates 50 and older constitute over 20% of prisoners in state or federal facilities. From 1996-2016, there was an 280% growth in the number of state and federal prisoners age 55 or older, which is in sharp contrast to younger inmates that grew by only 3% during this time period. A surge in older adult offenders in the U.S. has not occurred but rather statutes now impose stiffer sentences, resulting in longer periods of incarceration, such as life without parole or 20+ years. At the same time, early release policies remain restrictive. As a result, sentenced offenders are living through middle and older adulthood within the confines of prisons.

Detailed description

There are over 1,719 United States (US) state and federal prisons with over 2.3 million prisoners. In 2017, more than 20% of sentenced prisoners were age 50 or older. The health status of older inmates is often parallel with free-living people who are far older (e.g., 10-15 years). Older prisoners disproportionately contribute to the steeply rising correctional healthcare costs and their death rate is 10 times that of younger prisoners. Corrections budgets are stretched as they strive to meet the care needs of aged and dying prisoners. Carefully selected and vetted inmates offer an abundant human resource that is poised to contribute in important ways to augment prison staff in meeting growing care needs of older and dying inmates. However, the lack of standardized, evidence-based, training that is geared toward this target audience is a current barrier to ensuring high quality inmate caregiving. In response to this need, our Phase I project E-training of Inmate Peer Caregivers for Enhancing Geriatric and End-of-Life Care in Prisons demonstrated that inmate access to technology is growing and inmates can be successful e-learners. Specifically, we learned: (1) there is a need and interest for products such as our Inmates Care computer-based learning (CBL); (2) trainings should be engaging, interactive, and contextually sensitive to the specific environment, target user, and security constraints, while at the same time being mindful of emerging trends in regard to technology use by inmates (e.g., availability of tablets for purchase and use in many states); and finally, (3) that interactive, media-rich prototype modules with high acceptability and usability could be developed. The specifications document and commercialization plan indicated it is possible to develop a full-scale Inmates Care learning system in Phase II and a Technology Niche Analyses® revealed market potential exists. The purpose of this Phase II application is to continue research and development of the Inmates Care learning system with an emphasis on developing a scalable unit for commercialization and testing scale-up in a larger number of more diverse state prisons. More specifically, the aims of this Phase II study are to: 1) Develop a full scale media-rich interactive computer-based learning system Inmates Care, that consists of six modules aimed at augmenting the highly variable face-to-face inmate caregiving programs in state prisons with standardized, evidence-based training to prepare inmates in assisting with end-of-life (EOL) and geriatric care; and one Training Overview and Rollout module that prepares staff to use Inmates Care as a tool for inmate peer caregiver training; 2) Conduct in-person usability testing of the full-scale Inmates Care program in two rounds in state prisons to evaluate logistics, inmate and staff impressions, user interface, ease of use, and perceived barriers in order to optimize the scalable unit for broader dissemination (n=30); and 3) Test scale-up of the full-scale Inmates Care program in state prisons across the nation to evaluate knowledge acquisition outcomes, usage patterns, and commercialization opportunities (n=288).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALJust Care

The single intervention is a computer-based learning program.

Sponsors

Klein Buendel, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
Penn State University
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Cognitive interviews and small-scale usability will be conducted prior to conducting the full-scale testing. The full-scale learning system (6 learning modules for inmates; 1 learning module for staff) will be tested in 12 state prison settings. We plan to use a pragmatic approach. Targeted participants to test the inmate-focused modules will include both current Inmate Peer Caregivers and inmates who are naïve to the caregiving role in prison. Staff participants to test the staff-focused module include, but are not limited to security, chaplaincy, medical services, psychology/counseling, and administrative leaders. The number of user-participants is dependent on the institution's size, but our target is to recruit 12 sites (three of which will be women's prisons) and an average of 20 inmates per site (n=240 inmates) to test the six modules that are developed for inmates and an average of four prison staff per site (n=48) to test the one module for staff.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Inmate Peer Caregivers: 1. providing geriatric and/or EOL care at participating state prison (Aims 1 and 2 only); 2. age \>18; 3. able to speak and understand English; and 4. able to consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Under the age of 18 2. Unable to speak and understand English Prison Staff: Inclusion Criteria: 1. age \>18; 2. able to speak and understand English; 3. able to consent; and 4. have been exposed to inmate peer caregiving (e.g., through training them, oversight of a peer caregiving program, or working with inmate peer caregivers in the infirmary, personal care, or hospice area of prisons)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Small-Scale Virtual Usability Testing - SUS Survey (System Usability Test)Immediate post small-scale usability testingSmall-scale virtual usability testing participants were asked to complete the 10-item System Usability Test. The SUS, an industry-standard, assesses usability, including satisfaction, functionality, ease of use, and design. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Strongly Disagree) to 4 (Strongly Agree) and were summed and multiplied by 2.5 to compute a total scale score. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 100. The means of the Likert response items are calculated to determine the SUS score. The range of scores on the System Usability Scale (SUS) is 0-100. A score of 68 or greater reflects above average usability. Higher scores reflect greater usability.
Large-Scale Usability Testing - SUS Survey (System Usability Test)Immediate post large-scale usability testingLarge-scale testing participants were asked to complete the 10-item System Usability Test. The SUS, an industry-standard, assesses usability, including satisfaction, functionality, ease of use, and design. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Strongly Disagree) to 4 (Strongly Agree) and were summed and multiplied by 2.5 to compute a total scale score. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 100. The means of the Likert response items are calculated to determine the SUS score. The range of scores on the System Usability Scale (SUS) is 0-100. A score of 68 or greater reflects above average usability. Higher scores reflect greater usability.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBarbara Walkosz, PhD

Klein Buendel, Inc.

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Inmates and correctional staff from correctional facilities across different states participated in this study, a post-test only design. Individuals enrolled in this study tested the computer-based learning program either in small-scale usability testing or large-scale usability testing. All participants tested the computer-based learning program for acceptability, ease of use, and feasibility of wider dissemination.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous44.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
55 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
56 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 220 / 61
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 220 / 61
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 220 / 61

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 1, 2026