Skip to content

Optimizing Parameters of Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Cortical Modulation in Stroke Patients

Optimizing Parameters of Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Cortical Modulation in Stroke Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05016531
Acronym
LIFU
Enrollment
18
Registered
2021-08-23
Start date
2021-10-11
Completion date
2024-04-17
Last updated
2026-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

low intensity focused ultrasound, stroke, brain stimulation, ultrasonic stimulation

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to find out the optimal intensity and frequency of Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound (LIFU) that is safe and tolerable in people who have had a stroke.

Detailed description

Aim 1 is to determine the optimal intensity of Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound stimulation (LIFUS) in stroke patients in terms of safety. We will investigate the optimal spatial-peak temporal-average intensity/ISPTA in the range of 0(or sham) W/cm2 to 8 W/cm2. Safety will be investigated by assessing clinically detectable signs and symptoms by monitoring vital signs and surveying subjects with a questionnaire before and after each stimulation session, and additionally by detecting subclinical neuronal injury using MRI/DWI. Aim 1 requires up to 36 subjects. Aim 2 is to determine the optimal frequency of LIFU stimulation in stroke patients in terms of cortical excitability. Stroke subjects undergo each of the 5 frequency levels (0.35 MHz; 0.5 MHz; 0.75 MHz, 1.0 MHz and 1.5 MHz) on 5 different days with at least one day washout. The intensity (ISPTA) will set up at the level that is determined from Aim 1. Cortical excitability is measured by the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) from the Abductor Pollicis Brevis (ABP) muscle of the affected side. MEPs will be recorded pre- and post-stimulation to determine the optimal intensity for maximal cortical excitability from the hemisphere where the lesion is located. Aim 2 requires 18 subjects.

Interventions

DEVICELow Intensity Focused Ultrasonic Stimulation

Brain stimulation using ultrasonic stimulation in a sequence of increasing intensity (sham, 1 W/CM2, 2 W/CM2, 4 W/CM2, 6 W/CM2, 8 W/CM2)

DEVICELow Intensity Focused Ultrasonic Stimulation Frequency

Brain stimulation using ultrasonic stimulation of intensity level determined from intervention 1 at progressively increasing frequency levels (0.35 MHz; 0.5 MHz; 0.75 MHz, 1.0 MHz and 1.5 MHz)

Sponsors

Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER
American Heart Association
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. ≥ 21 years old of any gender and race; 2. Clinical ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic (confirmed by CT or MRI) that occurred \>= 2 months ago 3. Predominantly unilateral motor impairment with FM-UE score ≤ 62/66; 4. MEPs are inducible from a hand muscle on the affected side (i.e. Abductor Pollicis Brevis (APB) muscle).

Exclusion criteria

1. Any concomitant neurological disorder affecting arm function; 2. Documented history of severe dementia with or without medication before stroke; 3. Subject is unable to do the motor learning practice at the baseline; 4. Presence of any MRI/TMS/ultrasonic stimulation risk factors: an electrically, magnetically, or mechanically activated metal or nonmetal implant including cardiac pacemaker, intracerebral vascular clips, or any other electrically sensitive support system; non-fixed metal in any part of the body; pregnancy (the effect of TMS/ultrasonic stimulation on the fetus is unknown); no history of seizure before or after the stroke; preexisting scalp lesion or wound or bone defect or hemicraniectomy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety Outcomes as Measured by the Number of Participants With a "Major Response"At any point during or immediately following intervention on day of LIFUS applicationA "major response" is pre-defined as having any of the following events: Second degree scalp burn; Clinical seizure; New lesion on DWI sequence of MRI scan and the lesion not explained by any other cause(s) or decreased ADC under the transducer stimulating motor cortex area; Patient discontinues from the study due to any reason.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cortical Excitability as Measured by the Number of Participants Who Improved by ≥ 20% on Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) AmplitudeImmediately after ultrasonic stimulationCortical excitability is measured by Motor evoked potential(MEP) amplitude using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. The median amplitude of all MEPs was calculated and used as the measure of the corticospinal excitability. The percentage change in MEP (post-pre) was calculated and the number of participants who improved by ≥20 % on MEP amplitude is reported.
Motor Sequence Learning (MSL) as Measured by the Number of Participants Who Improved by ≥ 20% on a MSL TaskImmediately after ultrasonic stimulationMSL improvements is quantified by calculating the percentage change in the median response time (post-pre) and the number of participants who improved by ≥20 % on MSL is reported.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORWayne Feng

Duke Health

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Unable to complete Aim 2. No Aim 2 participants were enrolled.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 180 / 180 / 180 / 180 / 180 / 18
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 180 / 180 / 180 / 180 / 180 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 180 / 180 / 180 / 180 / 180 / 18

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 8, 2026