Skip to content

MANDARIN (S6371)

A Multicentre, Prospective, Open-label, Randomized Controlled Trial on the Efficacy and Safety of TheraSphereTM (Yttrium-90 Glass Microspheres) Compared to Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization (cTACE) in Chinese Patients With Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05016245
Enrollment
92
Registered
2021-08-23
Start date
2021-09-13
Completion date
2026-08-10
Last updated
2026-08-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Brief summary

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TheraSphereTM yttrium \[90Y\] glass microsphere in the Chinese patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTTheraSphere™ Yttrium-90 Glass Microspheres

TheraSphere™ Yttrium-90 Glass Microspheres TheraSphere™ is steam sterilized and supplied in 6 standard dose sizes: 3 GBq, 5 GBq, 7 GBq, 10 GBq, 15 GBq, 20 GBq. Custom dose sizes are also available in 0.5 GBq increments between 3 and 20 GBq. TheraSphereTM is supplied with the following accessories: Administration Set Administration Accessory Kit

PROCEDUREconventional Transarterial Chemoembolization(cTACE)

conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization(cTACE) is comprised of an anti-neoplastic agent(s) (i.e. cisplatin), lipiodol and embolic agent(s). The choice of agent(s) to be used is per usual local site practice. Chemotherapy agents can be as a single agent or used in combination, as per local practice.

Sponsors

Boston Scientific Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ≥18 and ≤80 age and provided study consent * Patients diagnosed with HCC and clinically evaluated as inoperable (as per local practice) or who refuse operation (ablation, hepatectomy and liver transplantation) * At least one well defined HCC tumor measurable by mRECIST in contrast-enhanced MRI * China liver cancer staging (CNLC) stage Ib\~IIb * Child-Pugh ≤ B7 * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 1 * Tumor burden ≤50% of the total liver volume

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of extra-hepatic metastases or additional malignancies aside from HCC * Patients with hepatic artery malformation and unable to intubate hepatic artery * Patients who are allergic to contrast agents or have renal insufficiency (Serum creatinine\>2mg/ml or Creatinine clearance\<30mL/min) and are not suitable for injection of contrast agents * Severe pulmonary insufficiency (FEV1/FVC\<50% or FEV1/predicting value\<50% or MVV\<50L/min) * AST and ALT \>5 times upper limit of normal * Clinical manifestations of decompensated cirrhosis (Grade2/3 of ascites, gastrointestinal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, etc. according to EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines) * HCC invading biliary tract or causing biliary obstruction * uncorrectable coagulation dysfunction and severe hemogram abnormality \[Prothrombin time (PT)\>6 seconds above control or PT-International normalized ratio (INR)\>2.5, WBC\<3.0x109/L, PLT\<50x109/L\] * Infiltrative HCC tumor type * Bilobar HCC disease * Any presence of portal vein or hepatic veins or artery invasion * Occlusion of portal vein completely with less collateral vessels * Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) or Hepatic arterioportal fistula * Patients during pregnancy or lactation * Prior interventional therapy via hepatic artery or radiotherapy treatment for HCC * Tc-99m macroaggregated albumin (MAA) hepatic arterial perfusion scintigraphy shows any deposition to the gastrointestinal tract that may not be corrected by angiographic techniques * Radiation pneumonitis has been seen in patients receiving doses to the lungs greater than 30 Gy in a single treatment or greater than 50Gy in multiple treatment * The absorbed dose of lung may exceed 30Gy in preoperative evaluation * Receive any investigational therapy or anti-tumor therapy within 30 days prior to study enrollment * Any other reason in which the investigator believes that the patient is unsuitable to participate in this trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to progression (TTP)through study completion, an average of 18 monthsTime to progression (TTP) Definition of progression: Progressive Disease (PD) assessment occurs according to mRECIST occurs according to mRECIST
Safety assessed within 60 days post treatment using NCI-CTCAE v5.0within 60 days post treatmentSafety assessed within 60 days post treatment using NCI-CTCAE v5.0

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hepatic time to progression (hTTP) determined by localized mRECIST (within the treated area)through study completion, an average of 18 months
Objective response rate (ORR) of the index lesion according to localized mRECIST (within the treatment area)through study completion, an average of 18 months
Confirmed ORR according to mRECISTthrough study completion, an average of 18 months
OS (Overall Survival)through study completion, an average of 18 months
Safety assessed using NCI-CTCAE v 5.0through study completion, an average of 18 monthsSafety assess: to standardize reporting, the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI CTCAE), version 5, was used to grade AEs and SAEs. Grades 1, 2, 3, and 4 represented mild, moderate, severe, and life-threatening toxicity, respectively. Grade 5 represented toxicity resulting in death. Descriptive analyses were conducted to assess the safety in each grade and summarized as the number of events and rate per subject.
Procedure technical successimmediately after the procedureProcedure technical success is determined successfully if all three items are satisfied at the same time during the operation as follow: * Device connected successfully or not; * Microspheres or anti-neoplastic agent(s) (i.e. cisplatin), lipiodol and embolic agent(s). deliver to target area well, or not by device parts; * There was no unplanned release of radiation or leakage of neoplastic agent(s) (i.e. cisplatin), lipiodol and embolic agent(s), or not by device parts.

Countries

China

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORGaojun TENG, Dr.

Zhongda Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 13, 2026