Skip to content

Contribution of Genetics, Non-invasive Methods and Neuropsychology in Focal Cryptogenic Epilepsies

Contribution of Genetics, Non-invasive Neurophysiological Methods, Neuroimaging and Neuropsychology in Identifying the Cause and the Epileptogenic Zone in Focal Cryptogenic Epilepsies

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05015868
Enrollment
5
Registered
2021-08-20
Start date
2021-07-15
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2025-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epilepsies, Partial, Epilepsy Intractable

Brief summary

Patients with cryptogenic focal epilepsy (unknown cause) represent about the 30% of the entire population of epilepsy patients. Among them, about 30% are drug-resistant. The implementation of of high-field magnetic resonance imaging resolution, the new Next Generation Sequencing techniques,and innovative non-invasive neurophysiological methods (Electroencephalogram-Functional magnetic resonance imaging and High Density-Electroencephalogram) could provide a superior identification of the epileptogenic zone and therefore an increased access to epilepsy surgery. Despite this, patients with cryptogenic epilepsy require more frequently invasive methods of presurgical study and they have more unfavorable results than patients with lesions detectable on magnetic resonance imaging. Within this context, the study is aimed at integrating the neurophysiological, radiological, neuropsychological and genetic aspects of patients with focal cryptogenic epilepsy in order to evaluate their surgical eligibility,sparing invasive methods.

Detailed description

The investigators foresee study duration of 36 months and the enrollment of about 20-25 patients, affected by cryptogenic epilepsy with onset during pediatric age (0-18 years), not only to identify the cause of epilepsy and the epileptogenic zone, but also to define in a non-invasive manner, the patient's possible eligibility for surgical therapy. Innovative neurophysiological methods, such as combined Electroencephalogram-Functional magnetic resonance imaging recording and high resolution electroencephalogram, in addition to 7 Tesla brain magnetic resonance imaging (available through the Imago7 non-profit foundation), neuropsychological studies and genetic tests through Next generation sequencing allow an advanced pre-surgical study free from the risks and discomforts caused by invasive methods. The systematic use of these diagnostic approaches will implement the knowledge and skills of the teams and it will stimulate their use in the clinical daily practise, especially for pediatric patients. In addition to that, the investigators would like to analyse descriptive indications relating to the diagnostic sensitivity of the combined Electroencephalogram-Functional magnetic resonance imaging recording, High Density-electroencephalogram and 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in the identification of the epileptogenic zone, in patients with cryptogenic focal epilepsy.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTStandard of care

Enrollment of patients afferent to our Center with cryptogenic drug-resistant epilepsy with onset in pediatric age, subject to informed consent; * acquisition and updating of Electroencephalogram polygraphic data of wakefulness and sleep and neuroradiological data (previous negative brain magnetic resonance imaging); * execution of a complete neuropsychological assessment for the classification of cognitive aspects and evaluation of executive functions; * execution of genetic tests through Next generation sequencing epilepsies panel or exome sequencing

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTFunctional magnetic resonance imaging-Electroencephalogram combined analysis

A functional brain magnetic resonance imaging is executed analysing blood oxygenation level dependent signal. During the functional recording, a contemporary electroencephalogram is registered in order to analyse the space-time relationship between the epileptic discharges and the bold abnormalities.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTHigh density- electroencephalogram or 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging

In the event that neither the cause nor the epileptogenic area has been identified, we will evaluate the execution of further tests, such as: * execution of High Density-electroencephalogram recording at IRCCS Medea di Conegliano (TV, Italy) (approximately 3 patients / year) for a further electrophysiological definition; * 7 Tesla brain magnetic resonance imaging performed at IRCCS Stella Maris in Calambrone (PI, italy) (approximately 3 patients / year expected), to obtain greater spatial resolution and better neuroradiological definition.

Sponsors

IRCCS Eugenio Medea
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Months to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* focal epilepsy, onset during pediatric age (\<18 y) * drug resistance * unknown cause * Brain magnetic resonance imaging negative

Exclusion criteria

* epilepsy with good therapeutic control * focal symptomatic epilepsy * age limits onset (\> 18 y)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Identification of the epileptogenic zone.through study completion, an average of 1 yearIdentification of the epileptogenic zone. Identification of non-invasive methods (Electroencephalogram-Functional magnetic resonance imaging, High Density-Electroencephalogram and 7 Tesla brain magnetic resonance imaging) in order to provide the necessary and crucial data, allowing the patient access to the epilepsy surgery without recurring to invasive methods. The calculation of the sample size was carried out on the basis of the primary objective of non-invasive identification of the epileptogenic zone. 60 patients will be sufficient to estimate the proportion of subjects treated with an effect size of 0.5, a power of 90% and a first type error of 5%. (60 patients are obtained by including patients from Conegliano).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic sensitivity comparisonthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearDiagnostic sensitivity comparison between combined Electroencephalogram-Functional magnetic resonance imaging and High Density-Electroencephalogram or 7Tesla brain magnetic resonance imaging recording for a patients subgroup.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026